similar to: About removing zlib from R-devel

Displaying 20 results from an estimated 10000 matches similar to: "About removing zlib from R-devel"

2015 Mar 27
2
About removing zlib from R-devel
Related to this question: I have installed bzip2 1.0.6 by hand, but configure still fails. When I look at config.log I get the following configure:34150: /usr/bin/gcc -std=gnu99 -o conftest -g -O2 -march=amdfam10 -g -O2 -march=amdfam10 -L/usr/local/lib64 confte st.c -lbz2 -lz -lrt -ldl -lm >&5 conftest.c: In function 'main': conftest.c:250: warning: initialization discards
2015 Mar 31
0
About removing zlib from R-devel
For people reading this: I was installing bzip2 by hand. Two things to bear in mind (1) it only installs a shared library if you use a special Makefile (this is clearly stated in the installation docs) and (2) I had to symlink libbz2.so.1 to libbz2.so.1.0.6 (the included libbz2.so.1.0 was not being picked up). Best, Kasper On Fri, Mar 27, 2015 at 11:19 AM, Kasper Daniel Hansen <
2019 Sep 04
2
possible bug in R's configure check for C++11 features
I am trying to compile R under a new setup, and frankly, I have had a lot of problems, but I think the stuff below points to a possible bug in R's (custom) configure checks for C++11/14/17, but not for C++98. This is a report about R from the R-3-6 branch, with a svn checkout from today, revision r77135. In my case the compiler name is x86_64-conda_cos6-linux-gnu-g++, not g++. I denote this
2015 Mar 26
1
About removing zlib from R-devel
On Thu, Mar 26, 2015 at 8:49 AM, Prof Brian Ripley <ripley at stats.ox.ac.uk> wrote: [...] > > This means that the next version of R will probably not available on Ubuntu >> > > The 'next version of R' will be 3.2.0, and the pre-3.2.0 sources include > zlib. My bad, sorry about that. I thought R-devel (trunk) will be released next, obviously not. > Whereas
2003 Nov 22
6
zlib missing when installing openssh-3.7.1p2
"Pacelli, Louis M, ALABS" wrote: > > Hi, > I apologize for sending in this problem via email, but I had trouble using bugzilla. Please use openssh-unix-dev at mindrot.org for problems with OpenSSH Portable (ie anything that's not OpenBSD). > I'm trying to install openssh-3.7.1p2 > When I run the configure step, I get the following message: > >
2015 Nov 04
2
Building R for AIX in 64-bit mode
On 2015-10-15 15:02, Prof Brian Ripley wrote: > On 15/10/2015 13:32, Michael Felt wrote: >> Hi. >> >> Just wanted to let you know I am getting close to packaging R for AIX in >> 64.bit mode. > > Which version? (You mentioned 3.1.3 and 3.2.2 far below.) There is > little value in reporting on frozen branches, and most value in > reporting on R-devel where
2016 Aug 03
2
Pull requests: CJK words and Snippet generator
Hi, On Fri, Jul 29, 2016, at 13:45, James Aylett wrote: > On Fri, Jul 29, 2016 at 12:12:25PM +0200, rsto at paranoia.at wrote: > > The FastMail snippet generator has been written when MSet didn't create > > snippets. I'll first compare both implementations to see if there is a > > good reason for them to coexist, or might just as well merge any > > additional
2008 Oct 26
1
HAVE_BZLIB_H not set
When building 2.8.0 this morning for Fedora, I noticed that it was building the included bzlib2 source and using it rather than the system bzip2 libraries and headers. I tracked down the reason to this section of configure: cat >>conftest.$ac_ext <<_ACEOF /* end confdefs.h. */ #ifdef HAVE_BZLIB_H #include <bzlib.h> #endif int main() { char *ver = BZ2_bzlibVersion();
2001 Nov 18
1
Configuration: libpng needs zlib, but ...
I noticed that congigure reported libpng as "not found" although a recent version exists. Further looking into this issue told me, that the test failed because the test from R.m4 AC_CHECK_LIB(png, png_create_write_struct, [ BITMAP_LIBS="${BITMAP_LIBS} -lpng -lz" AC_DEFINE(HAVE_PNG) ], , ${LIBS}) ], AC_MSG_RESULT([no])) ]) did
2004 Aug 06
3
Icecast drop in replacement for shoutcast
On Fri, 2003-04-18 at 20:01, Travis Pinney wrote: > I tried the icecast-2.0-alpha-2-20030416.tar.gz file. I am using OpenBSD > 3.2 and it configured ok but it had a problem linking libxslt. I have it > installed > from the ports. Not sure what it is but I am going to check it out. > > Here is the last part of the log. > > checking for xsltParseStylesheetFile... no >
2015 Mar 26
0
About removing zlib from R-devel
On 26 March 2015 at 07:47, G?bor Cs?rdi wrote: | Dear All, | | zlib has been removed from R-devel src/extra recently, and building R | requires zlib >= 1.2.5. Ubuntu 12.04 LTS (also used on Travis CI) only has | 1.2.3. | | This means that the next version of R will probably not available on Ubuntu | 12.04. (Unless I am missing something of course.) Which is probably fine, | it is almost three
2016 Feb 12
2
configure statement for R-devel with updated zlib in user account
I'm aware R-devel no longer includes zlib. This works find on up-to-date Linux systems. On the older Centos 6 cluster at KU, they have zlib tool old for R-devel. The R-devel configure fails thus: checking if zlib version >= 1.2.5... no checking whether zlib support suffices... configure: error: zlib library and headers are required In other software, I've seen this kind of thing, so
2015 Mar 26
0
About removing zlib from R-devel
On 26/03/2015 14:47, G?bor Cs?rdi wrote: > Dear All, > > zlib has been removed from R-devel src/extra recently, and building R > requires zlib >= 1.2.5. Ubuntu 12.04 LTS (also used on Travis CI) only has > 1.2.3. Hmm, 1.2.3 is from July 2005, 1.2.5 from July 2010. > This means that the next version of R will probably not available on Ubuntu The 'next version of R'
2013 Jul 29
2
[LLVMdev] opt -O3 causes Assertion `New->getType() == getType() && "replaceAllUses of value with new value of different type!"' failed
I am hitting an LLVM assertion from the llc tool iff the bitcode file is optimized at -O3 level by opt). -O1 and -O2 levels of opt do not cause this assert. LLVM version 3.4svn DEBUG build with assertions. Built Jul 14 2013 (15:39:08). Default target: x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu Host CPU: amdfam10 I have attached the input bc file before -O3 optimization :bzip2.del.bc.tgz I have attached
2013 Aug 02
2
[LLVMdev] opt -O3 causes Assertion `New->getType() == getType() && "replaceAllUses of value with new value of different type!"' failed
Hi Hal, I have filed http://llvm.org/bugs/show_bug.cgi?id=16780 -Milind On Fri, Aug 2, 2013 at 9:15 AM, Hal Finkel <hfinkel at anl.gov> wrote: > Milind, > > Have you filed a bug on this? If not, can you please open a bug report (http://llvm.org/bugs)? > > -Hal > > ----- Original Message ----- >> I am hitting an LLVM assertion from the llc tool iff the bitcode
2016 Jan 18
4
r-devel @ Travis
Hi! I'm developing R packages and use Travis CI for continous integration. When submitting to CRAN Im suggestet to test the package using the latest R-devel. I would like that all test where run using Travis. Is there anyone who knows if this is possible to run travis test using the latest r-devel? -- Regards M?ns ============================ M?ns Magnusson 070 - 588 97 15 mons.magnusson
2013 Aug 02
0
[LLVMdev] opt -O3 causes Assertion `New->getType() == getType() && "replaceAllUses of value with new value of different type!"' failed
Milind, Have you filed a bug on this? If not, can you please open a bug report (http://llvm.org/bugs)? -Hal ----- Original Message ----- > I am hitting an LLVM assertion from the llc tool iff the bitcode file > is optimized at -O3 level by opt). -O1 and -O2 levels of opt do not > cause this assert. > > LLVM version 3.4svn > DEBUG build with assertions. > Built Jul 14
2017 Feb 07
2
how can I know the version of my zlib checked by R
Hi, professors I??d like to install R-3.3.2 from .tar.gz on my linux system(CentOS 6.4). When installing, R told me that the version of zlib was too old. So, I eager to know which version of zlib did R-3.3.2 software examine at its configure step. How could I check the version of zlib? I will appreciate a lot if you could do me a favour. Best Regards Wei Ning Ctrip, Shanghai
2015 Jan 08
2
latex warning
Dear all, I am getting an R CMD check warning about the PDF manual. I am having a hard time finding out what is wrong, here is the log of the Rd2pdf call. The full check (and other) log is at https://api.travis-ci.org/jobs/46373922/log.txt?deansi=true if anybody is interested, and the package itself is here: https://github.com/metacran/r-builder/tree/bintex/rbuildertest Thanks, Best, Gabor
2013 Aug 09
0
[LLVMdev] opt -O3 causes Assertion `New->getType() == getType() && "replaceAllUses of value with new value of different type!"' failed
Hi, I don't see the LLVM bug I filed (http://llvm.org/bugs/show_bug.cgi?id=16780) making any progress. Can someone suggest me whether the bug is in the correct state? -Milind On Fri, Aug 2, 2013 at 1:29 PM, Milind Chabbi <Milind.Chabbi at rice.edu> wrote: > Hi Hal, > > I have filed http://llvm.org/bugs/show_bug.cgi?id=16780 > > -Milind > > On Fri, Aug 2, 2013 at