similar to: How to deal with functions detected as apparent S3 methods

Oh, I completely missed that one. It's very neat as it seems to work both on Windows and Unix. Thanks! Xavier On 10/02/15 10:52, Martyn Plummer wrote: > The CRAN package snow is superseded by the parallel package which is > distributed with R since version 2.14.0. Here are the release notes > > \item There is a new package \pkg{parallel}. > > It incorporates (slightly

Dear list, When I run an R CMD check --as-cran on my package (pROC) I get the following note: > Uses the superseded package: ?doSNOW? The fact that it uses the doSNOW package is correct as I have the following example in an .Rd file: > #ifdef windows > if (require(doSNOW)) { > registerDoSNOW(cl <- makeCluster(2, type = "SOCK")) > ci(roc2,

Hi, I was lately debugging parts of my 'colAUC' function in caTools package, and in a process looked into other packages for calculating Areas Under ROC Curves (AUC). To my surprise I found at least 6 other functions: * wilcox.test * AUC from ROC package, * performance from ROCR package, * auROC from limma package, * ROC from Epi package, * roc.area from verification

Hello Lartc''s users, This is my first contact. I''m trying to implement a new queue discipline based on bfifo schedule. I search on internet but there are some problem(s) that I don''t Know how to solve them and that''s why I''m here asking for your help. Well, These were my steps for the implementation: - Put the new qdisc routine

Hi I am trying to perform a bootstrap estimate of classification accuracy of a logistic regression using the 'Daim' package in r using the code at the bottom of this post, this all works great and I get the .632+ misclassification accuracy, specificity, sensitivity, AUC etc etc but what I would like is to access the list of AUC for each of the bootstrap samples as I need calculate the 95%

The R script below gives values of 1 for all minimum values when I use a custom function in summaryBy. I get the correct values when I use FUN=min directly. Any help is much appreciated. The continuous information provided in this forum is fabulous as are the different R packages available. Rene # Simulated simplified data Subj <- rep(1:4, each=6) Analyte <-

Hi, I would like to compare differences in AUC from 2 different models, glm and gam for predicting presence / absence. I know that in theory the model with a higher AUC is better, but what I am interested in is if statistically the increase in AUC from the glm model to the gam model is significant. I also read quite extensive discussions on the list about ROC and AUC but I still didn't find

plot(svm.auc, col=2, main="ROC curves comparing classification performance\n of six machine learning models") legend(0.5, 0.6, c(ns, nb, nr, nt, nl,ne), 2:6, 9) # Draw a legend. plot(bo.auc, col=3, add=T) # add=TRUE draws on the existing chart plot(rf.auc, col=4, add=T) plot(tree.auc, col=5, add=T) plot(nn.auc, col=6, add=T) plot(en.auc, col=9,lty="dotted",lwd=3, add=T) Hi,

Hi there, I really tried hard to understand and find my own solution, but now I think I have to ask for your help. I already developed some script code for my problem but I doubt that it is correct. I have the following problem: Image you develop a logistic regression model with a binary outcome Y (0/1) with possible preditors (X1,X2,X3......). The development of the final model would be

Dear List, I am trying to assess the prediction accuracy of an ordinal model fit with LRM in the Design package. I used predict.lrm to predict on an independent dataset and am now attempting to assess the accuracy of these predictions. >From what I have read, the AUC is good for this because it is threshold independent. I obtained the AUC for the fit model output from the c score (c =

Dear all, I was wondering if someone can help me. I am learning SVM for classification in my research with kernlab package. I want to know about classification performance using Area Under Curve (AUC). I know ROCR package can do this job but I found all example in ROCR package have include prediction, for example, ROCR.hiv {ROCR}. My problem is how to produce prediction in SVM and to find

Dear R-philes, I am plotting ROC curves for several cross-validation runs of a classifier (using the function below). In addition to the average AUC, I am interested in obtaining a confidence interval for the average AUC. Is there a straightforward way to do this via the ROCR package? plot_roc_curve <- function(roc.dat, plt.title) { #print(str(vowel.ROC)) pred <-

I am doing a simulation with a relatively large data set (20,000 observations) for which I want to calculate the area under the Receiver Operator Curve (AUC) for many parameter combinations. I am using the ROC library and the following commands to generate each AUC: rocobj=rocdemo.sca(truth = ymis, data = model$fitted.values, rule = dxrule.sca) #generation of observed ROC object

Dear R-experts: I am using a function called AUC whose arguments are data, time, id, and dv. data is the name of the dataframe, time is the independent variable column name, id is the subject id and dv is the dependent variable. The function computes area under the curve by trapezoidal rule, for each subject id. I would like to embed this in aggregate to further subset by each

Hello R gurus, I have the code below for which i need help and pointers to make it run in parallel on a dual core win7 computer with R 2.13.x, using foreach, iterators,doMC. library(scatterplot3d) # Loads 3D library. library(fields) library(MASS) library(ROCR) library(verification) library(caret) library(gregmisc) ##simulated data d=replicate(9, rnorm(40)+10)

Guys, I used Random Forest with a couple of data sets I had to predict for binary response. In all the cases, the AUC of the training set is coming to be 1. Is this always the case with random forests? Can someone please clarify this? I have given a simple example, first using logistic regression and then using random forests to explain the problem. AUC of the random forest is coming out to be

Hello - I am using glmnet to generate a model for multiple cohorts i. For each i, I run 5 separate models, each with a different x variable. I want to compare the fit statistic for each i and x combination. When I use auc, the output is in some cases is < .5 (.49). In addition, if I compare mean MSE (with upper and lower bounds) ... there is no difference across my various x variables, but

I might be missing something but I thought that AUC was a measure for comparing ROC curves, so there is nothing else needed to "compare" them. The larger AUC is the higher correlation of 2 variables compared. No other measures or calculations are needed. Jarek Tuszynski -----Original Message----- From: r-help-bounces at stat.math.ethz.ch [mailto:r-help-bounces at stat.math.ethz.ch] On

Dear all, I am using the ROCR library to compute the AUC and also the Hmisc library to compute the C-index of a predictor and a group variable. The results of AUC and C-index are similar and give a value of about 0.57. The Wilcoxon p-value is <0.001! Why the AUC is showing small value and the p-value is high significant? The AUC is based on Wilcoxon calculation? Many thanks, Lina

Dear all I am trying to compare the performances of several methods using the AUC0.1 and not the whole AUC. (meaning I wanted to compare to AUC's whose x axis only goes to 0.1 not 1) I came to know about the Mcneil Hanley test from Bernardo Rangel Tura and I referred to the original paper for the calculation of "r" which is an argument of the function cROC. I can only find the