similar to: Closing over Garbage

Dear all, I sent an email on Friday asking about nlrq {quantreg}, but I haven't received any answer. I need to estimate the quantile regression estimators of a model as: y = exp(b0+x'b1+u). The model is nonlinear in parameters, although I can linearise it by using log.When I write: fitnl <- nlrq(y ~ exp(x), tau=0.5) I have the following error: Error in match.call(func, call = cll) :

On 14 October 2013 18:15, Nadav Rotem <nrotem at apple.com> wrote: > 1. We have 4 stores to consecutive locations, but the last element is the > constant zero, and not an additional SUB. At the moment we don’t have > support for idempotence operations, but this is something that we should > add. > The fourth write is not necessary for GCC to vectorize it (nor was in the

The plastics industry says polycarbonate bottles are safe. http://www.bisphenol-a.org/about/faq.html#g I'm sure Maggie and here friends would say ALL plastic bottles are very dangerous. This lady seems to be at a reasonable middle ground. http://trusted.md/blog/vreni_gurd/2007/03/29/plastic_water_bottles Polycarbonate plastics the kind of bottle you bought contains BPA. "In 2006 Europe

Hi: I have usually used the GROWTH() excel function to do this but now want to see if I can do this with R. I want to predict values into the future, possibly with the predict.arima Function. I have the following weekly fish weight averages: weight <- c("2.1","2.4","2.8","3.6","4.1","5.2","6.3") week <-

Dear all Please, can you advice me how to compute an error, standard deviation or another measure of variability of computed value. I would like to do something like: var(y) = some.function(var(x1),var(x2),var(x3)) for level F1 (2,3,...) Let say I have some variables - x1, x2, x3 (two computed for levels of factor F and one which is same for all levels) and I want to compute y =

This is almost ideal for SLP vectorization, except for two problems: 1. We have 4 stores to consecutive locations, but the last element is the constant zero, and not an additional SUB. At the moment we don’t have support for idempotence operations, but this is something that we should add. 2. The values that we are subtracting come from 3 loads. We usually load 4 elements from memory, or

Hi everyone, I am trying to fit a sine function on one year of wind data. I have two questions below. Looking around on the net I managed to get the following: Sine Equation: y = a + b * sin( c + d*x ) b is the amplitude, c is the phase shift, d is something deal with periodicty of data*.* This can be linearised by sin( c+dx ) = cos(c) * sin(dx) + sin(c) * cos(dx). If one calls dx = x1 y

Hi, Sanjoy, On 2015-11-16 23:27, Sanjoy Das wrote: > Hi Vlad, > > vlad via llvm-dev wrote: >>> Vlad, >>> >>> My initial impression is that you've stumbled across a bug. I suspect >>> that we - the only active users of the deopt info in the statepoint I >>> know of - have been inverting the meaning of Direct and Indirect >>>

Dear all, I have a serious problem to solve my model. I study over exploitation of fish in the bay of biscay (france). I know only the level of catch and the fishing effort (see data below) by year. My model is composed by the following equations: * the growth function Gt(St) = r*St*(1-St/sbar) with Gt the growth of each period t r intrinsec growth of the stock sbar carriyng capacity of the

FAIL: /Volumes/mrs5/net/llvm/llvm/test/CFrontend/2007-09-20- GcrootAttribute.c Failed with exit(1) at line 3 while running: /Volumes/mrs5/Packages/llvm-2/bin/llvm-gcc -emit-llvm - S -emit-llvm /Volumes/mrs5/net/llvm/llvm/test/CFrontend/2007-09-20- GcrootAttribute.c -o - | llvm-as llvm-as: assembly parsed, but does not verify as correct! Enclosing function does not specify a collector algorithm.

Dear list members, this is not an R question and forgive me for using the list for irrelevant questions, but this is the only place I know where I can find some good statisticians and I need an expert opinion. There is this power law kinetic model of the form: M=kt^n where t is the time, M is the fraction of drug released, k is the rate constant and n is an exponent related to the mechanism of

Rich, Our workflow is something like this: 0. Start with a fresh copy of windows server 2k8 1. We read the system hive and then write to it a bunch of times 2. Boot windows 3. Read from the system hive Hivex reports the failure at step #3. I also noticed that the size of the registry hive observed in step #3 is the same as step #0. Is it possible that hivex issues write that cause a hive file

The form is inside a table, enclosing a <tr> = form_tag admins_backoffice_dashboards_path, :remote =>"true" do %tr.search %th= link_to t(:clear), "#", :id => :clearFilter %th= select_tag :role, options_from_collection_for_select(Role.global, :id, :name, :selected => @role_id ) %th= text_field_tag :email, nil, :value

In this case the environment contains the variables local to the function, and its enclosure is the environment of the enclosing function.(R-lang:p11) I want to know if the "enclosing function" means the closure of the function? for example ,if I call function mean(),and the create an environment,say e1,then the enclosure of e1 is the namespace of base package? Right? Thank you!

On Fri, Oct 04, 2013 at 03:13:47PM +0000, Subramanian, Hari wrote: > Rich, > > Our workflow is something like this: > > 0. Start with a fresh copy of windows server 2k8 > 1. We read the system hive and then write to it a bunch of times > 2. Boot windows > 3. Read from the system hive > > Hivex reports the failure at step #3. I also noticed that the size of the >

Hello Yes, I agree that the SCEV cannot be simplified. Is my understanding correct that it is passed to a function like "isKnownNegative"? Which could still be able to prove is always true. The delinearisation may be valid, depending on exactly how you define delinearisation (under what conditions it should be giving results). It would be invalid for DA to return a dependency of [0

Hi all, I've been looking through the documentation (http://llvm.org/docs/GarbageCollection.html) on how to implement a garbage collector for LLVM and there's a couple of things that I don't quite understand. Specifically, it says that when a stack variable goes out of scope, you're supposed to assign a null value to it to indicate that the value is no longer live. What I

On Jan 1, 2008, at 9:29 PM, Evan Cheng wrote: > > On Dec 30, 2007, at 9:04 PM, Christopher Lamb wrote: > >> Currently tablegen emits a rather surprising match code for the >> following case: >> >> Suppose we have a pattern that uses a ComplexPattern to match an >> operand. This pattern then appears as a child pattern in a >> different pattern.

I actually posted about this here on samba list about it last year, but nobody caught interest. I used to have logs from samba and wireshark, which very nicely showed what's wrong (kerberos request was for SPN  eg. "Hyper-V Replication Service/Servername.mydomain.com" and in samba log there was an error with something like "Hyper-V\ Replication \Service.. not found".

Hi Talin, On Sep 2, 2007, at 04:54, Talin wrote: > I've been looking through the documentation (http://llvm.org/docs/ > GarbageCollection.html) on how to implement a garbage collector for > LLVM and there's a couple of things that I don't quite understand. > Specifically, it says that when a stack variable goes out of scope, > you're supposed to assign a