similar to: New version of Rtools for Windows

The r.dll crash is easy - you need to be using gcc-ar for ar, and gcc-ranlib for ranlib. I also posted a patch to fix the check failure for stack probing, as lto optimizes away the stack probing code, as it should. yes, lto build's speed gain is very impressive. ------------------------------ On Thu, Jan 8, 2015 2:01 PM GMT Henric Winell wrote: >On 2015-01-08 14:18, Avraham Adler

Very timely, as this is how I got into the problem I posted about earlier; maybe some of the problems I ran into will mean more to the you and the experts on this thread, Dr. Murdoch.For reference, I run Windows 7 64bit, and I am trying to build a 64 bit version of R-3.1.2. As we discussed offline, Dr. Murdoch, I've been trying to build R using more recent tools than GCC4.6.3 prerelease.

Oh, I forgot to mention that besides setting AR, RANLIB and the stack probing fix, you also need a very up to date binutils. 2.25 was out in december. Even with that , if you linker's default is not what you are compiling for (i.e. a multiarch toolchain), you need to set GNUTARGET also, i.e. -m32/-m64 is not enough. Some fix to autodetect non-default targets went in after christmas before the

On Fri, Jan 9, 2015 at 12:19 PM, Duncan Murdoch <murdoch.duncan at gmail.com> wrote: > On 09/01/2015 10:56 AM, Henric Winell wrote: >> On 2015-01-08 02:31, Duncan Murdoch wrote: >> >>> On 07/01/2015 5:20 PM, Jeroen Ooms wrote: >>>> On Wed, Jan 7, 2015 at 8:00 AM, Duncan Murdoch <murdoch.duncan at gmail.com> wrote: >>>>>

It seems that version of ICU_531 in <http://www.stats.ox.ac.uk/pub/Rtools/goodies/> as of June 25, 2014, was compiled using sjlj exception handling (current gcc-4.6.3, perhaps?). I say that as I am trying a 4.9.2 distribution which uses seh handling, and I get errors like: gcc -std=gnu99 -m64 -shared -s -mwindows -o R.dll R.def console.o dynload.o editor.o embeddedR.o extra.o malloc.o

On 2015-01-08 02:31, Duncan Murdoch wrote: > On 07/01/2015 5:20 PM, Jeroen Ooms wrote: >> On Wed, Jan 7, 2015 at 8:00 AM, Duncan Murdoch <murdoch.duncan at gmail.com> wrote: >>> >>> This version includes only minor updates to the tools. I indicated last summer that I was hoping to update GCC from the current version 4.6.3 before the R 3.2.0 release, but this now

Hello! I'm trying to install R-patched from source on a Windows 64 bit laptop. I have installed R-tools 2.16 and set up the jpeg, tiff, and libpng files Here is the output: c:\R64\R-patched\src\gnuwin32>make all recommended make all recommended make[1]: `MkRules' is up to date. make[4]: Nothing to be done for `svnonly'. installing C headers make[2]: Nothing to be done for

This is is an issue that bugged me for a while. I encountered a year ago (April 2012) when I first tried to build R from source on Windows. I never figured out what the solution is or if I'm doing something wrong myself (but I have found a tedious workaround). I'm still on the same Windows 7 Ultimate machine with NTFS, but I now made sure I started from scratch so I have a completely

On Wed, Jan 7, 2015 at 8:00 AM, Duncan Murdoch <murdoch.duncan at gmail.com> wrote: > > This version includes only minor updates to the tools. I indicated last summer that I was hoping to update GCC from the current version 4.6.3 before the R 3.2.0 release, but this now looks unlikely, unless someone else with experience building it can help. I have been looking into this a bit over

On 07/01/2015 5:20 PM, Jeroen Ooms wrote: > On Wed, Jan 7, 2015 at 8:00 AM, Duncan Murdoch <murdoch.duncan at gmail.com> wrote: >> >> This version includes only minor updates to the tools. I indicated last summer that I was hoping to update GCC from the current version 4.6.3 before the R 3.2.0 release, but this now looks unlikely, unless someone else with experience building

I'm currently attempting to build R-2.10.1 from the source on Windows 7 (64-bit version). I've downloaded the latest Rtools (Rtools211.exe) from the Murdoch-Sutherland site and have done a full install. I've also downloaded the HTML Help Workshop, MikTeX, and the InnoSetup installer. I am not using any 64-bit versions of the tools, such as the MinGW-w64, or a 64-bit version of TCL

On Thu Jan 9 2014 03:47 Henrik Bengtsson wrote: > This is is an issue that bugged me for a while. I encountered a year > ago (April 2012) when I first tried to build R from source on Windows. > I never figured out what the solution is or if I'm doing something > wrong myself (but I have found a tedious workaround). I'm still on > the same Windows 7 Ultimate machine with

On Tue, Feb 13, 2018 at 12:22 PM, Indrajit Sen Gupta <indrajitsg at gmail.com> wrote: > Hi Avraham, > > I tried with the patched version. The same error message. > > gcc -std=gnu99 -m64 -shared -s -mwindows -o R.dll R.def console.o dynload.o > editor.o embeddedR.o extra.o malloc.o opt.o pager.o preferences.o psignal.o > rhome.o rt_complete.o rui.o run.o shext.o

I was able to compile the R from the github by running build-r-devel.bat! Now need to see how to compile it with BLAS. Regard, Indrajit On Tue, Feb 13, 2018 at 5:45 PM, Jeroen Ooms <jeroenooms at gmail.com> wrote: > On Tue, Feb 13, 2018 at 12:22 PM, Indrajit Sen Gupta > <indrajitsg at gmail.com> wrote: > > Hi Avraham, > > > > I tried with the patched

Dear R People: I'm trying to compile R-2.15.0 on a 64 bit Windows machine. However, I'm getting the following error: c:\R64\R-2.15.0\src\gnuwin32>set TMPDIR=c:\temp set TMPDIR=c:\temp c:\R64\R-2.15.0\src\gnuwin32>make all recommended make all recommended make[1]: `MkRules' is up to date. make[4]: Nothing to be done for `svnonly'. installing C headers make[2]: Nothing to

Hi Avraham, I tried with the patched version. The same error message. gcc -std=gnu99 -m64 -shared -s -mwindows -o R.dll R.def console.o dynload.o editor.o embeddedR.o extra.o malloc.o opt.o pager.o preferences.o psignal.o rhome.o rt_complete.o rui.o run.o shext.o sys-win32.o system.o dos_wglob.o dllversion.o ../main/libmain.a ../appl/libappl.a ../nmath/libnmath.a getline/gl.a

In the file MkRules.local.in, I see the line: USE_ATLAS = NO which I believe needs to be changed to YES. But how do I specify the BLAS file *libopenblas_haswell-r0.2.20.a *and its location? Regards, Indrajit On Tue, Feb 13, 2018 at 6:41 PM, Indrajit Sen Gupta <indrajitsg at gmail.com> wrote: > I was able to compile the R from the github by running build-r-devel.bat! > > Now need

Hi, I tried to compile R-2.10.0 src on 64 bit window. After install Rtools and wingw-w64 compiler and put it the first of my PATH variable, but i got the following error when i tried to compile. Anything I missed? thank you. x86_64-w64-mingw32-gcc -std=gnu99 -I../include -I. -I../extra -DHAVE_CONFIG_H -D R_DLL_BUILD -O3 -Wall -pedantic -DR_ARCH='"x64"' -c malloc.c -o

On Mon, Mar 6, 2017 at 8:21 PM, Richard Beare <richard.beare at gmail.com> wrote: > Yep - simpleITK is available at github.com/SimpleITK/SimpleITK. There's > also github.com/SimpleITK/SimpleITKRInstaller - a devtools based installer > for mac and linux. > > CMake has a range of build environments. I experimented with MSYS2 and > mingw makefiles, but had trouble with

Hello all, I'm trying to build R 32bit from source in a Windows 64 machine. I have followed the steps in "R Installation and Adiministration" ( http://cran.r-project.org/doc/manuals/R-admin.html#Getting-the-source-files) or at least I think I did everything described. I am not sure if I have installed the libjpeg, libtiff and libpng files though. I have upzipped them in the