Displaying 20 results from an estimated 8000 matches similar to: "gsub with perl=TRUE results in 'this version of PCRE is not compiled with Unicode property support' in R-devel"
2015 Jan 08
0
gsub with perl=TRUE results in 'this version of PCRE is not compiled with Unicode property support' in R-devel
Why are you reporting that your PCRE library does not have something
which the R-admin manual says it should preferably have? To wit,
footnote 37 says
'and not PCRE2, which started at version 10.0. PCRE must be built with
UTF-8 support (not the default) and support for Unicode properties is
assumed by some R packages. Neither are tested by configure. JIT support
is desirable.'
That
2023 Jul 25
1
Bug in perl=TRUE regexp matching?
On 7/24/23 4:10 AM, Duncan Murdoch wrote:
> On 23/07/2023 9:01 p.m., Brodie Gaslam wrote:
>>
>>
>> On 7/23/23 4:29 PM, Duncan Murdoch wrote:
>>> The help page for `?gsub` says (in the context of performance
>>> considerations):
>>>
>>>
>>> "... just one UTF-8 string will force all the matching to be done in
>>>
2015 Jan 13
2
R CMD build looking for texi2dvi in the wrong place (R-devel)
R CMD build fails with recent R-devel because it is looking for texi2dvi in /usr/local/bin, but on this system, MacTex has installed it in /usr/bin.
$ R CMD build IRanges
* checking for file 'IRanges/DESCRIPTION' ... OK
* preparing 'IRanges':
* checking DESCRIPTION meta-information ... OK
* cleaning src
* installing the package to build vignettes
* creating vignettes ... ERROR
2015 Jun 08
2
Bug in loadNamespace?
I am seeing very strange behaviour in R 3.2.0 patched (r68272) and a new
build of R-devel. The sessioninfo() from the former is below.
Here's what I see: If I set the locale, and trigger a namespace load, a
version comparison gives NA, and I get an error. For example, in a new
session started with R --vanilla from the terminal:
> Sys.setlocale(locale='en_US.UTF-8');grid::gpar()
2023 Jul 23
1
Bug in perl=TRUE regexp matching?
The help page for `?gsub` says (in the context of performance
considerations):
"... just one UTF-8 string will force all the matching to be done in
Unicode"
However, this thread on SO: https://stackoverflow.com/q/76749529 gives
some indication that this is not true for `perl = TRUE`. Specifically:
> strings <- c("89 562", "John Smith", "???????
2015 Jun 08
3
Bug in loadNamespace?
On 07/06/2015 9:14 PM, Dirk Eddelbuettel wrote:
>
> On 7 June 2015 at 20:46, Duncan Murdoch wrote:
> | I am seeing very strange behaviour in R 3.2.0 patched (r68272) and a new
> | build of R-devel. The sessioninfo() from the former is below.
> |
> | Here's what I see: If I set the locale, and trigger a namespace load, a
> | version comparison gives NA, and I get an
2015 May 24
2
[Mesa-dev] [PATCH 2/2] nv30: fix clip plane uploads and enable changes
On 05/24/2015 06:58 AM, Ilia Mirkin wrote:
> nv30_validate_clip depends on the rasterizer state. Also we should
> upload all the new clip planes on change since next time the plane data
> won't have changed, but the enables might.
>
> Signed-off-by: Ilia Mirkin <imirkin at alum.mit.edu>
> ---
> src/gallium/drivers/nouveau/nv30/nv30_state_validate.c | 16
2020 Jun 08
1
Potential issue with perl-based pattern matching with Unicode characters on Windows R 4.0 and above
Hi everyone,
I've noticed new behavior in `regexpr(..., perl = TRUE)` on Windows with
R4.0 and above with Unicode characters. Here's a minimal example where I'd
expect to see a start value of `5` (as R 3.6.2 and below gives), but R
4.0.0 (and R 4.0.1) now returns:
```
> regexpr("b", "foo\U0001F937bar", perl = TRUE)
#> [1] 6
#>
2015 May 24
2
[Mesa-dev] [PATCH 2/2] nv30: fix clip plane uploads and enable changes
> On 24 May 2015, at 16:03, Tobias Klausmann <tobias.johannes.klausmann at mni.thm.de> wrote:
>
>
>
> On 24.05.2015 10:38, Samuel Pitoiset wrote:
>>
>>
>> On 05/24/2015 06:58 AM, Ilia Mirkin wrote:
>>> nv30_validate_clip depends on the rasterizer state. Also we should
>>> upload all the new clip planes on change since next time the
2020 Mar 17
2
configure --with-pcre1 fails with latest R 4.0 on Ubuntu 14.04
Using --with-pcre1 to configure the latest R 4.0 (revision 77988) on an
Ubuntu 14.04.5 LTS system gives me the following error:
...
checking if lzma version >= 5.0.3... yes
checking for pcre2-config... no
checking for pcre_fullinfo in -lpcre... yes
checking pcre.h usability... yes
checking pcre.h presence... yes
checking for pcre.h... yes
checking pcre/pcre.h usability... no
checking
2020 Mar 18
2
configure --with-pcre1 fails with latest R 4.0 on Ubuntu 14.04
Thanks Tomas. Any chance the old version of the error message could be
restored? It would definitely be more helpful than the current one. It's
confusing to get an error and be told to use --with-pcre1 when you're
already using it.
H.
On 3/18/20 01:08, Tomas Kalibera wrote:
> On 3/17/20 8:18 PM, Herv? Pag?s wrote:
>> Using --with-pcre1 to configure the latest R 4.0 (revision
2015 May 24
2
[Mesa-dev] [PATCH 2/2] nv30: fix clip plane uploads and enable changes
On Sun, May 24, 2015 at 10:56 AM, Tobias Klausmann
<tobias.johannes.klausmann at mni.thm.de> wrote:
>
>
> On 24.05.2015 16:15, Pierre Moreau wrote:
>>>
>>> On 24 May 2015, at 16:03, Tobias Klausmann
>>> <tobias.johannes.klausmann at mni.thm.de> wrote:
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> On 24.05.2015 10:38, Samuel Pitoiset wrote:
2019 May 14
3
Pcre install
Hello,
I downloaded R-3.6.0.tar.gz from https://cran.r-project.org/src/base/R-3/.
I tried to install R-3.6.0.tar.gz in Ubuntu system.
Thanks in advance for any help!
yue
checking for pcre.h... yes
checking pcre/pcre.h usability... no
checking pcre/pcre.h presence... no
checking for pcre/pcre.h... no
checking if PCRE version >= 8.20, < 10.0 and has UTF-8 support... no
checking
2015 Nov 20
3
R-devel no longer supports Ubuntu 14.04 LTS (insufficient PCRE version)
Since yesterday's r69662, R no longer ./configure[s] on a standard
Ubuntu 14.04.3 installation, which ships with PCRE 8.31
(http://packages.ubuntu.com/trusty-updates/libpcre3-dev)
I get:
> checking if PCRE version >= 8.32, < 10.0 and has UTF-8 support... no
> checking whether PCRE support suffices... configure: error: pcre library and headers are required
Are there any
2015 Apr 08
1
PCRE, and setting C-, LD- and CPP-FLAGS for a local r-devel installation
Hello,
Got some at the time surprising errors some days ago when building a local
r-devel installation on a cluster, with apparent outdated or missing dev
versions of some files. After reading the r-devel news (
https://developer.r-project.org/blosxom.cgi/R-devel/NEWS), it turned out
that " Use of the included versions of ?zlib?, ?bzlib?, ?xz? and PCRE is
deprecated: these are frozen and
2019 Feb 25
3
pcre problems
Hi there, ubuntu 18.04.2, trying to compile R-devel 3.6.0, svn 76155.
I am having difficulty compiling R. I think I have pcre installed correctly:
OK~/Downloads/R-devel pcretest -C
PCRE version 8.41 2017-07-05
Compiled with
8-bit support
UTF-8 support
No Unicode properties support
No just-in-time compiler support
Newline sequence is LF
\R matches all Unicode newlines
Internal
2007 Jan 19
2
pcre library in R (PR#9319)
I have the same problem, trying to cross-compile.
I'm running Ubuntu Edgy, kernel 2.6.17-10-generic, on an IBM T60.
I downloaded the Makefile from CRAN and ran make CrossCompileBuild
with the following error messages (also ran each make one at the time
and the problem occurs in make R):
../extra/pcre/libpcre.a(pcre_dfa_exec.o):pcre_dfa_exec.c:(.text+0x1703):
undefined reference to
2007 Dec 03
3
pcre vs. regexp for Postfix checks
What are your opinions on pcre vs regexp for header_, body_, and
mime_checks in Postfix?
I looked at the regexp_table and prce_table man pages, and see
almost no difference other than the available flags.
Miark
2017 Aug 02
2
Re: [PATCH 0/2] Add lightweight bindings for PCRE.
On Wed, Aug 02, 2017 at 12:33:14PM +0200, Pino Toscano wrote:
> Hi,
>
> (replying here since v2 of the series does not have this explanation.)
>
> On Tuesday, 1 August 2017 16:00:15 CEST Richard W.M. Jones wrote:
> > We'd like to use PCRE instead of the awful Str module. However I
> > don't necessarily want to pull in the extra dependency of ocaml-pcre,
>
2019 Mar 01
2
pcre problems
thanks for this guys.
I only compiled pcre myself as a last resort, because of the
./configure failure. But AFAICS apt-get reports correct
installation:
OK~/Downloads/R-devel sudo apt-get install r-base-dev
Reading package lists... Done
Building dependency tree
Reading state information... Done
r-base-dev is already the newest version (3.5.2-1cosmic).
0 upgraded, 0 newly installed, 0 to