similar to: Potential cross-platform package building issue

On 3 January 2015 at 13:49, Steven Ranney wrote: | I am using 32-bit R 3.1.2 on Windows 7. | | I recently conducted an `R CMD check --as-cran` on a recently-developed | package and received only the 'New submission' note. Research on | StackOverflow and on R-devel suggested this could be ignored. I also used | devtools::build_win() and received no notes or warnings, other than the one |

Full_Name: Ross Boylan Version: 2.2.0 OS: Linux Submission from: (NULL) (65.175.48.58) \eqn{{\bf\beta}_j}{b(j)} in my .Rd file produces this error -------------------------------------------- ! Missing $ inserted. <inserted text> $ l.7 \eqn{{\bf\beta}_j}{\bf\beta}_ jnormal-bracket5bracket-normal{b(j)} -- ! Missing $ inserted. <inserted

Hi, I'm trying to get maximum likelihood estimates of \alpha, \beta_0 and \beta_1, this can be achieved by solving the following three equations: n / \alpha + \sum\limits_{i=1}^{n} ln(\psihat(i)) - \sum\limits_{i=1}^{n} ( ln(x_i + \psihat(i)) ) = 0 \alpha \sum\limits_{i=1}^{n} 1/(psihat(i)) - (\alpha+1) \sum\limits_{i=1}^{n} ( 1 / (x_i + \psihat(i)) ) = 0 \alpha \sum\limits_{i=1}^{n} (

Dear all, I would be grateful if anyone can help me with the following: My aim is to compute explicitely the sum S=A+B where A=sum(exp(c_i/d)), i=1,...,n; B, c_i, and d are real numbers with -Inf<B,c_i<+Inf; and d>0. The problem is that when c_i/d >710 (for some i) R is setting exp(c_i/d) to be equal to +Inf and hence the whole summation S. So in simple cases where for example c_i=8

In nonparametric regression and density estimation, something like \hat{f'}(x) [LaTeX] is very natural. In all S dialects, hat(f') is invalid syntax, and hence one cannot use something like plot(1, main = expression(hat(f'))) I can say something like plot(1, main = expression(widehat(paste(f, "'"))), cex.main = 3) but that (the R code, not the plot result)

Hello, I am solving a set of ODEs using deSolve and have run into a problem I would appreciate some advice on. One of the parameters (m) in the ODEs changes between two states when one of the variables (D) crosses a threshold (D_T) for the first time in either direction. Additionally, when the variable crosses the threshold (either by increasing or decreasing), there is a time delay (delay)

Hi, I have a right-censored (positive) random variable (e.g. failure times subject to right censoring) that is observed for N subjects: Y_i, I = 1, 2, ..., N. Note that Y_i = min(T_i, C_i), where T_i is the true failure time and C_i is the censored time. Let us assume that C_i is independent of T_i. Now, I would like to generate another random variable U_i, I = 1, 2, ..., N, which is

Hi Andrew, Thank you very much for the most helpful explanations! Many things could go in as comments, if you ask me - for example: --- > The LLVM machine model is an abstract machine. > The abstract pipeline is built around the notion of an "issue point". This is merely a reference point for counting machine cycles. > > > IssueWidth is meant to be a hard in-order

Hi Andy, >> Right now it seems that BeginGroup/EndGroup is only used by SystemZ, >> or? I see they are used in checkHazard(), which I actually don't see >> as helpful during pre-RA scheduling for SystemZ. Could this be made >> optional, or perhaps only done post-RA if target does post-RA >> scheduling? SystemZ does post-RA scheduling to manage decoder

The document R-exts contains the following example of using mathematics in R documentation. \deqn{p(x) = {\lambda^x\ \frac{e^{-\lambda}}{x!}} {p(x) = lambda^x exp(-lambda)/x!} There is a syntax error in there, but that's not my point. The problem is that using "R CMD Rd2dvi" I find that putting the alternate forms of the equation on top of each other doesn't work.

> On Apr 18, 2018, at 1:04 AM, Hannah Meredith <hrmeredith12 at gmail.com> wrote: > > Hello, > > I am solving a set of ODEs using deSolve and have run into a problem I > would appreciate some advice on. One of the parameters (m) in the ODEs > changes between two states when one of the variables (D) crosses a > threshold (D_T) for the first time in either direction.

Hi, This is a problem about writing R documentation (R-exts 2.6). The command "\deqn" defined in "Rd.sty" is: \newcommand{\deqn}[2]{\[#1\]} which will put mathematical formulae in the "displaymath" environment; that means line breaks are not allowed (or will not be shown) in formulae, but sometimes we do need multiple lines of formulae. One solution is to write

> On May 14, 2018, at 11:10 AM, Jonas Paulsson <paulsson at linux.vnet.ibm.com> wrote: > > Hi Andrew, > > Thank you very much for the most helpful explanations! Many things could go in as comments, if you ask me - for example: > > --- >> The LLVM machine model is an abstract machine. > >> The abstract pipeline is built around the notion of an

Hi all, I am doing some experiment studies... It seems to me that with different combination of 5 parameters, the end results ultimately converged to two scalars. That's to say, some combinations of the 5 parameters lead to one end result and some other combinations of the 5 parameters lead to the other end result (scalar). I am thinking of this is sort of something like clustering or

Hi, Zvi, I agree. In the context of targeting the KNL, however, I'm a bit concerned about the addressing, and specifically, the size of the resulting encoding: > vmovdqu32 zmm0, zmmword ptr [rax + c+401280] ;load b[401280] in > zmm0 > > vpaddd zmm1, zmm1, zmmword ptr [rax + b+401344] > ; zmm1<-zmm1+b[401344] The KNL can only

I'm currently working on writing up some documentation for some of my code, but am having the darndest time coding in equations. For example, the equation in the following: \details{ Calculated the R Squared for observed endogenous variables in a structural equation model, as well as several other useful summary statistics about the error in thoe variables. R Squared values are

Hello, I have defined 8 registers in registerinfo.td file in the following order: R_0, R_1, R_2, R_3, R_4, R_5, R_6, R_7 But the generated assembly code only uses 2 registers. How to enable it to use all 8? Also can i control the ordering like after R_0 can i use R_5 without changes in registerinfo.td? What changes are required here? either in scheduling or register allocation phases?

Dear list, I got an automatic email complaining than some of my packages didn't pass 'R CMD check' for R-2.10.0 alpha anymore. Both of them make use of the "cases" LaTeX environment. Inspecting the log outputs I got: LaTeX errors when creating PDF version. This typically indicates Rd problems. LaTeX errors found: ! Misplaced alignment tab

Hi Ahmed, >From what can be seen in the code snippet you provided, the reuse of XMM0 and XMM1 across loop-unroll instances does not inhibit instruction-level parallelism. Modern X86 processors use register renaming that can eliminate the dependencies in the instruction stream. In the example you provided, the processor should be able to identify the 2-vloads + vadd + vstore sequences as

Dear R-listers, I want to reperfrom a poisson distribution test that presented in a recent-published biological research paper (Plant Physiology 2008, vol 148, pp. 1189-1200). That test is about the occurrence number of a kind of gene in separate chromosomes. For instance: The observed gene number in chromosome A is 36. The expected gene number in chromosome A is 30. Then, the authors got a