similar to: Conflicting definitions for function redefined as S4 generics

That might be worth thinking about generally, but it would still be nice to have the base generics pre-defined, so that people are not copy and pasting the definitions everywhere, hoping that they stay consistent. On Wed, Mar 26, 2014 at 6:13 AM, Gabriel Becker <gmbecker@ucdavis.edu>wrote: > Perhaps a patch to R such that generics don't clobber each-other's method > tables

On 03/27/2014 02:13 AM, Ulrich Bodenhofer wrote: > I fully agree, Michael, that this would be a great thing to have! I have > often wondered why R and the standard packages are still sticking so > much to the old-style S3 flavor though S4 is part of standard R. I > acknowledge that backward compatibility is important, but, as far as I > got it, redefining a function or S3 generic as

I fully agree, Michael, that this would be a great thing to have! I have often wondered why R and the standard packages are still sticking so much to the old-style S3 flavor though S4 is part of standard R. I acknowledge that backward compatibility is important, but, as far as I got it, redefining a function or S3 generic as an S4 generic should not harm existing functionality (if done

Hi, I just figured out that I accidentally posted my message in HTML, so I am retrying in plain text only. Sorry. I am currently extending one of our CRAN packages and ran into an unexpected problem when checking the source package. I got some warnings in the step "* checking for code/documentation mismatches". I double checked everything and did not see anything that would

On 01/22/2018 08:40 AM, Ulrich Bodenhofer wrote: > Thanks a lot, I?aki, this is a perfect solution! I already implemented > it and it works great. I'll wait for 2 more days before I submit the > revised package to CRAN - in order to give others to comment on it. It's very easy for 'pictures of code' (unevaluated code chunks in vignettes) to drift from the actual

Re-sending, since I forgot to include the list, sorry. I'm including r-package-devel too this time, as it seems more appropriate for this list. El 22 ene. 2018 10:11, "I?aki ?car" <i.ucar86 at gmail.com> escribi?: > > > El 22 ene. 2018 8:12, "Ulrich Bodenhofer" <bodenhofer at bioinf.jku.at> > escribi?: > > Dear colleagues, dear members of

Dear colleagues, This is to inform you that Version 1.3.0 of the R package apcluster has been released on CRAN yesterday. We did a major extension and overhaul of the package. Most importantly, we added Leveraged Affinity Propagation in fulfillment of multiple users requests. It should now be much easier to cluster large data sets. Apart from this extension, the interfaces to apcluster() and

Dear colleagues, This is to inform you that Version 1.3.1 of the R package apcluster has been released on CRAN. We did a major improvement of heatmap and dendrogram plotting, as well as several minor improvements of the package. For more details, see the following URLs: http://www.bioinf.jku.at/software/apcluster/ http://cran.r-project.org/web/packages/apcluster/index.html Best regards,

Dear colleagues, This is to inform you that I will be giving a webinar on the apcluster package on Thursday, June 13, 2013, 7:00pm CEST (10:00am PDT). The outline of the one-hour webinar is as follows: - Introduction to affinity propagation (AP) clustering - The apcluster package, its algorithms, and visualization tools - Live apcluster demonstration - Question and Answer period To register

Thanks a lot, I?aki, this is a perfect solution! I already implemented it and it works great. I'll wait for 2 more days before I submit the revised package to CRAN - in order to give others to comment on it. Best regards, Ulrich On 01/22/2018 10:16 AM, I?aki ?car wrote: > Re-sending, since I forgot to include the list, sorry. I'm including > r-package-devel too this time, as it

On 03/27/2014 06:31 PM, Herv? Pag?s wrote: > On 03/27/2014 02:13 AM, Ulrich Bodenhofer wrote: >> [...] >> >> For the time being, it seems I have three options: >> >> 1) not supplying the sort() function yet (it is not yet in the release, >> but only in my internal devel version) >> 2) including a dependency to BiocGenerics >> 3) leaving the

Dear colleagues, dear members of the R Core Team, This was an issue raised by Prof. Brian Ripley and sent privately to all developers of CRAN packages that suggest Bioconductor packages (see original message below). As mentioned in my message enclosed below, it was easy for me to fix the error in examples (new version not submitted to CRAN yet), but it might turn into a major effort for the

Hi, I am using R on Ubuntu 12.10 (64bit). This morning, Ubuntu's software updater automatically installed updates to R's base system (version 2.15.3; via the CRAN PPA). Now R does not work anymore. Here is what I get when I simply enter "R" on the shell prompt: bodenhof FUKUOKA~>R cannot find system Renviron Error : .onLoad failed in loadNamespace() for 'utils',

Hi All, Here is the case. I want to build classification model (SVM). Some of variables for this model are categorical attributes which represent words (usually 3-10 words - query for search in google). For example: search_id | query_words |..| result -----------+----------------------------------+--+-------- 1 | how,to,grow,tree |..| 4 2

Hi, I am currently extending one of our CRAN packages and ran into an unexpected problem when checking the source package. I got some warnings in the step "* checking for code/documentation mismatches". I double checked everything and did not see anything that would actually justify this warning. After testing around for quite a while, I think I can now pinpoint the problem. In

------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ CALL FOR PAPERS 15th International Conference on Managed Languages & Runtimes (ManLang'18) September 10-14, 2018, Linz, Austria http://ssw.jku.at/manlang18/ ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ ManLang (formerly PPPJ) is a

Dear all, I have some problems to install R-2.4.1 on AIX 5.3. Configure string: ./configure --with-readline=no LDFLAGS='-bshared' --with-jpeglib=no --with-libpng=no --with-lapack=no --prefix=/cineca/prod/Bioinf/R-2.4.1 configure .site= #! /bin/sh CC=xlc F77=xlf MAIN_LDFLAGS=-Wl,-brtl SHLIB_LDFLAGS=-Wl,-G CXX=xlc CXXFLAGS=' -g -O' SHLIB_LDFLAGS=-W1, -G MAKE=gmake Configure ends

Dear Person That Posted This Email, Please be aware that calls for papers are only on-topic for this email list if they are specifically about LLVM. For example, a call for a workshop on LLVM in Scientific Computing would be on topic whereas a general compiler call for papers (like the one below) is not. That said, I hope you receive many strong submissions. Your conference looks

Hello, I have a dataset with proportions that vary around a fixed mean, is it possible to use betareg to look at variance in the dispersion parameter while keeping the mean fixed? I am very new to R but have tried the following: svec<-c(qlogis(mean(data1$scaled)),0,0,0) f<-betareg(scaled~-1 | expt_label + grouped_hpi, data=data1, link.phi="log",

Hi, I have a dataset that looks like the one below. data plot plantno. species H 31 ABC D 2 DEF Y 54 GFE E 12 ERF Y 98 FVD H 4 JKU J 7 JFG A 55 EGD . . . . . . .