similar to: Invitation to register for the Think with Terra Blockchain Tech Talk

Displaying 20 results from an estimated 100 matches similar to: "Invitation to register for the Think with Terra Blockchain Tech Talk"

2011 Oct 19
3
[LLVMdev] Question regarding basic-block placement optimization
On Oct 19, 2011, at 5:50 AM, Chandler Carruth wrote: > Ok, wow that wasn't hard at all. Awesome ;-) > This is still *very* much a rough draft, but it's probably better to review that the previous patch. One big caveat, I know I have an iteration bug in here somewhere that is inf-looping. Just ran out of steam debugging it, will pick it back up again later today to shake it out.
2019 Oct 23
2
RFC: On non 8-bit bytes and the target for it
This RFC is to ask whether the community is interested in further discussion of iN bytes support. Last time the issue was on the agenda in May and the discussion was triggered by Jesper Antonsson's patches (see <https://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/llvm-dev/2019-May/132080.html> https://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/llvm-dev/2019-May/132080.html). It seems that, while some downstream areas
2012 Aug 02
2
[LLVMdev] [NVPTX] Strange assertion around BlockToChain.clear(); in Release+Asserts build
Hi, After building out project in release mode, caught an assertion, which we have not seen before: hello_f: /tmp/rpmbuild_debug/BUILD/llvm/build/include/llvm/ADT/DenseMap.h:126: void llvm::DenseMap<KeyT, ValueT, KeyInfoT>::clear() [with KeyT = llvm::MachineBasicBlock*, ValueT = <unnamed>::BlockChain*, KeyInfoT = llvm::DenseMapInfo<llvm::MachineBasicBlock*>]: Assertion
2012 Aug 03
0
[LLVMdev] [NVPTX] Strange assertion around BlockToChain.clear(); in Release+Asserts build
Dear NVPTX community, I've create a bug http://llvm.org/bugs/show_bug.cgi?id=13521 with reprocase for this issue. Please, help us to fix it. Last 1,5 months we regularly encounter & workaround or fix 1-2 bugs per week in NVPTX backend. This is definitely not the amount of work we can completely serve ourselves... We would really really appreciate some collaboration. Thanks, - D.
2012 Aug 03
1
[LLVMdev] [NVPTX] Strange assertion around BlockToChain.clear(); in Release+Asserts build
Unfortunately, I cannot reproduce this. Based on your bugzilla comment, it does look like a mis-compile with your system compiler. Does the same issue occur if you build LLVM as static libraries? On 08/03/2012 12:24 AM, Dmitry N. Mikushin wrote: > Dear NVPTX community, > > I've create a bug http://llvm.org/bugs/show_bug.cgi?id=13521 with > reprocase for this issue. > >
2011 Oct 20
0
[LLVMdev] Question regarding basic-block placement optimization
On Oct 19, 2011, at 7:56 AM, Jakob Stoklund Olesen wrote: >> This is still *very* much a rough draft, but it's probably better to review that the previous patch. One big caveat, I know I have an iteration bug in here somewhere that is inf-looping. Just ran out of steam debugging it, will pick it back up again later today to shake it out. > > Some random notes: > > - Please
2016 Jun 30
1
Entry for llvm.org/ProjectsWithLLVM - Terra programming language
Terra: A low-level counterpart to Lua By Zach DeVito (http://cs.stanford.edu/~zdevito) Terra (http://terralang.org/) is a system programming language that is embedded in and meta-programmed by Lua, which handles details like conditional compilation, type systems, namespaces, and templating/function specialization that are normally special constructs in other languages. Terra code shares
2011 Oct 20
2
[LLVMdev] Question regarding basic-block placement optimization
Thanks for all of the comments Andy and Jakob. A new patch is attached that is *much* less of a rough draft. Sorry for any confusion due to the early state of the patch. Also, many many thanks to Jakob for his explanation of how the branches between MBBs should be handled, and Andy, Jim, and Eric who helped answer my questions on IRC when I ran into stumbling blocks. Also, Nick, who shoulder
2011 Oct 19
0
[LLVMdev] Question regarding basic-block placement optimization
On Wed, Oct 19, 2011 at 3:24 AM, Chandler Carruth <chandlerc at google.com>wrote: > On Tue, Oct 18, 2011 at 6:58 PM, Jakob Stoklund Olesen <stoklund at 2pi.dk>wrote: > >> >> On Oct 18, 2011, at 5:22 PM, Chandler Carruth wrote: >> >> As for why it should be an IR pass, mostly because once the selection >>> dag runs through the code, we can never
2011 Oct 19
3
[LLVMdev] Question regarding basic-block placement optimization
On Tue, Oct 18, 2011 at 6:58 PM, Jakob Stoklund Olesen <stoklund at 2pi.dk>wrote: > > On Oct 18, 2011, at 5:22 PM, Chandler Carruth wrote: > > As for why it should be an IR pass, mostly because once the selection dag >> runs through the code, we can never recover all of the freedom we have at >> the IR level. To start with, splicing MBBs around requires known about
2018 Apr 09
1
EuroLLVM'18 : moderators needed!
The EuroLLVM'18 Developers’ Meeting relies on volunteers to keep things running smoothly. Moderators are critical to this as they keep speakers on track and facilitate Q&A after the talk. I’m looking for community members who would be attending specific talks anyway, to volunteer to moderate the sessions. If you are interested in volunteering, *please respond to this email with your first
2018 Apr 09
0
EuroLLVM'18 : moderators needed!
I'm can do the Lighting Talks [session 9] (I did one in the fall so I know the pain) or the following session 10 By the way, the online schedule at https://2018eurollvm.sched.com doesn't include the lighting talks.  There is just a "round table" entry with no speaker or abstract information. > Message: 3 > Date: Mon, 9 Apr 2018 11:34:32 +0200 > From: Arnaud Allard de
2018 Oct 07
0
Come Hell or High Treason
<http://callingketti.cf/lists/lt.php?id=YUgNCAdSGAFUXR1QWlQKVF0F> <http://callingketti.cf/lists/lt.php?id=YUgMAAZRGAFUXR1QWlQKVF0F> Normally I start this message off with the whole "this is what Exodus is all about <http://callingketti.cf/lists/lt.php?id=YUgMAg9SGAFUXR1QWlQKVF0F> " and "the election is not to die bold
2017 Apr 11
3
CentOS 6 and pxeboot
Pete Biggs wrote: > >> We've been using pxeboot to pull up a menu, to build or rebuild >> machines for years. We have this new server, and it fails. Times out. >> What's happening is that it tries in this order >> .../pxelinux.cfg/b8945908-d6a6-41a9-611d-74a6ab80b83d >> .../pxelinux.cfg/01-88-99-aa-bb-cc-dd >> .../pxelinux.cfg/C0A8025B
2019 Oct 31
2
RFC: On non 8-bit bytes and the target for it
David, just to clarify a misconception I might have introduced, we do not have linear memory in the sense that all data is stored as a trie. We do support arrays, structures and GEPs, however, as well as all relevant features in C by modeling memory. So regarding concepts of byte, all 5 statements you gave are true for our target. Either due to the specification or because of performance (gas
2019 Oct 24
4
RFC: On non 8-bit bytes and the target for it
On 24/10/2019 14:21, JF Bastien via llvm-dev wrote: > I’d like to understand what programming model you see programmers using. > You don’t need 257 bits per byte if you only offer 257 bit integers. > Rather, bytes aren’t really a thing at that point. LLVM kinda handles iN > already, and your backend would legalize everything to exactly this type > and nothing else, right? Would
2018 Aug 19
0
The House of .... BETHESDAY ... and stripping in a Fishbowl. #nipoolsoparmleg
"Beth <http://bethesday.gq/lists/lt.php?id=YUgFAQVcUU9RVlkdU1wDX1cNVg> esda" reads as "the house is the..." in Spanglishrew ... CITY Who knows whose ... *Adamic language* is, according to Jewish <http://bethesday.gq/lists/lt.php?id=YUgFAQVcUk9RVlkdU1wDX1cNVg> tradition (as recorded in the /midrashim
2006 Dec 27
0
Thanks For The Present!
Alright Mongrel people, thanks for contributing to the mayhem around popularity by making me the official King of the Internet. In case you all missed it, here''s my blog post on my first act as King: http://www.zedshaw.com/blog/2006-12-26.html Stay tuned for pedro. I want to make this reign very democratic and chaotic. (I wonder if the Nitro folks will help with pedro?) The whole
2010 Nov 16
1
Who uses R with multicore, SNOW or CUDA package for resource intense computing?
Hi, who of you in this forum uses R (http://www.r-project.org/) with the multicore, SNOW or CUDA packages, so for advanced calculations that need more power than a workstation CPU? On which hardware do you compute these scripts? At home/ at work or do you have data center access somewhere? The background of these questions is the following: I am currently writing my M.Sc. thesis about R and
2018 May 20
0
You say #nothing... I say "Hello. Hello! Hello?" Moving forward with this will stop this violence, it will also stop murder, and then death. (... in that order)
<cursi.ve.lamc.la> You are in The Matrix <http://isiti.gq/lists/lt.php?id=YUgNAAVdGAFSXB1QWlQKVF0F> . That's a significantly better thing than implied by the movie, but it's a good introduction to the reason for Creation, and why we are here trying to help an entire civilization transition from ?simulated reality? to Heaven. The New Testament is our guide, and seeing it's