similar to: Beware kernel 2.6.10

FYI This bug will prevent ''shorewall restore'' from working if you have "!<single IP address>" in the ORIGINAL DEST column. -Tom ---------- Forwarded Message ---------- Subject: [PATCH] Another iptables-save buglet Date: Wednesday 14 September 2005 15:09 From: Tom Eastep <teastep@shorewall.net> To: netfilter-devel@lists.netfilter.org The conntrack

A merged patch usable on 2.6.10 has been placed in: http://shorewall.net/pub/shorewall/contrib/IPSEC/ipsec-nat-2.6.10.patch ftp://shorewall.net/pub/shorewall/contrib/IPSEC/ipsec-nat-2.6.10.patch This patch was posted today on the Netfilter Development list -- I have not tested it. -Tom -- Tom Eastep \ Nothing is foolproof to a sufficiently talented fool Shoreline, \ http://shorewall.net

The Shorewall2/ project in CVS contains my initial attempt to establish correct routing for traffic forwarded from two different ISPs to internal servers. >From the release notes: Shorewall 2.3.2 includes support for multiple Internet interfaces to different ISPs. This feature is enabled by setting the "default" option for each Internet interface in

FYI... ---------- Forwarded Message ---------- Subject: RE: [Shorewall-users] 2.6 kernel ipsec and shorewall Date: Thursday 23 September 2004 07:44 From: "Jonathan Schneider" <jon@clearconcepts.ca> To: "''Tom Eastep''" <teastep@shorewall.net> I must have been up too late working on this, looking at it the next day I noticed I completely forgot

http://shorewall.net/pub/shorewall/2.2-Beta/shorewall-2.2.0-Beta2 ftp://shorewall.net/pub/shorewall/2.2-Beta/shorewall-2.2.0-Beta2 Problems Corrected: 1. The "shorewall check" command results in the (harmless) error message: /usr/share/shorewall/firewall: line 2753: check_dupliate_zones: command not found 2. The

Hi I have 2nic firewall . I had to open some ranges of udp and tcp ports . I faced a problem that although all the ports are open Some functionality was not working . Any body used shorewall with H323 Voip traffic DNATed . Any help is appretiated . Thanks ----- Original Message ----- From: <shorewall-users-request@lists.shorewall.net> To: <shorewall-users@lists.shorewall.net> Sent:

http://shorewall.net/pub/shorewall/2.2-Beta/shorewall-2.2.0-Beta2 ftp://shorewall.net/pub/shorewall/2.2-Beta/shorewall-2.2.0-Beta2 Problems Corrected: 1. The "shorewall check" command results in the (harmless) error message: /usr/share/shorewall/firewall: line 2753: check_dupliate_zones: command not found 2. The

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 As I pointed out to Wilson in a private message, this appears to show that no other connection requests (other than port 3000) are being sent from the client to the server (or at least no other connection requests are being received by the Shorewall box). Wilson: Are you sure that the client is supposed to open port 3001 on the server and not the

Because certain large European ISPs can''t get their act together WRT SPF, I''ve turned on masquerading of lists.shorewall.net. This means that list postings will now have "shorewall.net" sender addresses rather than "lists.shorewall.net". Sorry for the inconvenience but a lot of email is currently bouncing. -Tom -- Tom Eastep \ Nothing is foolproof to a

This will be the final 2.3 release. It makes available multiple-ISP support. There is one external change to the version that has been in CVS for the last couple of days -- the ''default'' provider option has been named ''balance'' to better describe what the option does (load balancing). Please see http://shorewall.net/Shorewall_and_Routing.html for more

Jason Wohlford wrote: > > linux:/etc/shorewall# shorewall check > /sbin/shorewall: line 261: Added: command not found > Loading /usr/share/shorewall/functions... > Processing /etc/shorewall/params ... > Processing /etc/shorewall/shorewall.conf... > /usr/share/shorewall/firewall: line 261: Added: command not found BTW -- it looks like you have a missing "#" on a

The patches may be found at: http://shorewall.net/pub/shorewall/contrib/IPSEC ftp://shorewall.net/pub/shorewall/contrib/IPSEC I found these patches on the netfilter-devel list and make no warranties as to how well they work (or not). -Tom -- Tom Eastep \ Nothing is foolproof to a sufficiently talented fool Shoreline, \ http://shorewall.net Washington USA \ teastep@shorewall.net PGP

Thanks for such a quick reply Tom! Any suggestions then as to what I might do other than putting a second nic in the SBS and opening it up for web access? I don''t like the idea, but since MS SBS includes fireall that is actually what MS suggests. Boyd -----Original Message----- From: Tom Eastep [mailto:teastep@shorewall.net] Sent: January 3, 2005 3:05 PM To: Shorewall Users Cc: Boyd

>-----Original Message----- >From: Ama Kalu [mailto:ama.kalu@cwlgroup.net] >Sent: Wednesday, November 19, 2003 9:07 PM >To: ''Tom Eastep'' >Subject: RE: [Shorewall-users] logwatch > >Thanks Tom and Andrew, > >About 2 months ago, I setup the most current (at the time) version of >logwatch, it required a service filter for IPTABLES which I did not have

Hi Tom, Many thanks for that, that''s really helped. Netfilter is indeed dropping the packets as invalid. Thanks and regards, Frances -----Original Message----- From: Tom Eastep [mailto:teastep@shorewall.net] Sent: 23 March 2007 18:05 To: Shorewall Users Subject: Re: [Shorewall-users] Expected handling of [SYN] when expecting[SYN, ACK]? Frances Flood wrote: > Basically, if the

Plus I would like to let you know that it works like a charm. Snort can now see those packets. -----Original Message----- From: shorewall-users-bounces@lists.shorewall.net [mailto:shorewall-users-bounces@lists.shorewall.net] On Behalf Of Thibodeau, Jamie L. Sent: Wednesday, March 30, 2005 9:25 AM To: Mailing List for Shorewall Users Subject: RE: [Shorewall-users] Shorewall and an inline

No, i did it normally. So it seems a router misconfiguration, doesn`t it? if so, tomorrow i will call the customer support. Glad it is not my fault :-) -- Ciao Nico ----- Messaggio originale ----- Da: "Tom Eastep"<teastep@shorewall.net> Inviato: 07/06/04 20.27.28 A: "Mailing List for Shorewall Users"<shorewall-users@lists.shorewall.net> Oggetto: Re:

In policy $FW Net ACCEPT Dump.rar join THX -----Message d''origine----- De : shorewall-users-bounces@lists.sourceforge.net [mailto:shorewall-users-bounces@lists.sourceforge.net] De la part de Tom Eastep Envoyé : jeudi 12 octobre 2006 21:22 À : Shorewall Users Objet : Re: [Shorewall-users] Tc rules Help with multiISP + squid& squidguard... Joffrey FLEURICE wrote: > > >

Yessssssssssssssssssss !! THANKSS it Works !!!! Thanks a lot, if you come to Lille,France I''ll Offer you a big Beer) Joffrey -----Message d''origine----- De : shorewall-users-bounces@lists.sourceforge.net [mailto:shorewall-users-bounces@lists.sourceforge.net] De la part de Tom Eastep Envoyé : jeudi 19 octobre 2006 21:46 À : Shorewall Users Objet : Re: [Shorewall-users] Tcrules

In policy : -----Message d''origine----- De : shorewall-users-bounces@lists.sourceforge.net [mailto:shorewall-users-bounces@lists.sourceforge.net] De la part de Tom Eastep Envoyé : jeudi 12 octobre 2006 21:22 À : Shorewall Users Objet : Re: [Shorewall-users] Tc rules Help with multiISP + squid& squidguard... Joffrey FLEURICE wrote: > > > All works, but no surf with