similar to: This list elicits spam

On 28 March 2020 at 14:04, Robin Lovelace wrote: | To the list this time... | | On Sat, Mar 28, 2020 at 2:03 PM Robin Lovelace <rob00x at gmail.com> wrote: | | > Hi Dirk, | > | > Thanks for the quick response. | > | > I've updated the draft post following your suggestions, see the updated | > version, in nice .md format, here: | >

On 3/28/20 10:04 AM, Robin Lovelace wrote: > To the list this time... > > On Sat, Mar 28, 2020 at 2:03 PM Robin Lovelace <rob00x at gmail.com> wrote: > >> Hi Dirk, >> >> Thanks for the quick response. >> >> I've updated the draft post following your suggestions, see the updated >> version, in nice .md format, here: >>

On 3 May 2018 at 13:21, Jeroen Ooms wrote: | On Wed, May 2, 2018 at 10:35 AM, Robin Lovelace <rob00x at gmail.com> wrote: | > I'd be interested to hear views on how and when Ubuntu users should upgrade | > to R 3.5.0. | > I made the upgrade a few days ago but reverted because of issues installing | > packages such as rJava, which I installed on the system with r-cran-rjava. |

I'd be interested to hear views on how and when Ubuntu users should upgrade to R 3.5.0. I made the upgrade a few days ago but reverted because of issues installing packages such as rJava, which I installed on the system with r-cran-rjava. Also any advice on how to do a clean uninstall of the previous version before making the leap greatly appreciated. Thank you. Robin [[alternative HTML

Dear list, I've drafted an article on installing geographic R packages on Linux computers and would appreciate any feedback. Is the following text correct, useful and future-proof?: R?s spatial packages can be installed from source on recent (since Ubuntu 19.04) versions of this popular operating system, once the appropriate repository has been set-up, meaning faster install times (only a

On 20 May 2018 at 09:34, Robin Lovelace wrote: | Thanks for keeping us updated. Before I jump the gun and put this out on | social media (as a follow-up to this tweet | https://twitter.com/robinlovelace/status/990682038373158912 ), would you | say this is a reasonable message to send to the R-using Ubuntu community?: Why don't we just wait until Michael feels he has something to announce?

Many thanks Dirk, kind-of makes sense and I think my 'hold your horses' attitude is probably safest for now. Two follow-up questions: - Roughly how long will it be until "everything has been rebuilt"? - Could this seemingly new project help manage external deps: https://github.com/r-hub/sysreqsdb ? On Wed, May 2, 2018 at 1:23 PM, Dirk Eddelbuettel <edd at

On 13 June 2018 at 20:54, Robin Lovelace wrote: | I have recently re-installed R on my Ubuntu system to get R 3.5 and found | this to have worked: | | # you may need to remove incumbent repos e.g. with: | sudo apt-add-repository --remove ppa:marutter/rrutter | | # add new repos | sudo apt-add-repository ppa:marutter/rrutter3.5 # for base R | sudo apt-add-repository ppa:marutter/c2d4u4.5 # for

To the list this time... On Sat, Mar 28, 2020 at 2:03 PM Robin Lovelace <rob00x at gmail.com> wrote: > Hi Dirk, > > Thanks for the quick response. > > I've updated the draft post following your suggestions, see the updated > version, in nice .md format, here: >

On Wed, May 2, 2018 at 10:35 AM, Robin Lovelace <rob00x at gmail.com> wrote: > I'd be interested to hear views on how and when Ubuntu users should upgrade > to R 3.5.0. > I made the upgrade a few days ago but reverted because of issues installing > packages such as rJava, which I installed on the system with r-cran-rjava. My strategy will be to jump to R 3.5 when I upgrade

On 5/3/18 7:43 AM, Dirk Eddelbuettel wrote: > > On 3 May 2018 at 13:21, Jeroen Ooms wrote: > | On Wed, May 2, 2018 at 10:35 AM, Robin Lovelace <rob00x at gmail.com> wrote: > | > I'd be interested to hear views on how and when Ubuntu users should upgrade > | > to R 3.5.0. > | > I made the upgrade a few days ago but reverted because of issues installing > |

New EXT3 Packages have been uploaded to ftp.beta.redhat.com today. We have expanded the packages offering by popular request :-) You may download these packages via anonymous ftp, or via the web page at http://www.beta.redhat.com/. BUGS Bugs against these packages should still be posted at bugzilla.redhat.com Product: Red Hat High Availability Server Version: beta Component: ext3

Hello All, When I try to install r-base-dev on my Ubuntu 16.04 it gives me the following error r-base-dev : Depends: dh-r but it is not installable E: Unable to correct problems, you have held broken packages. I added the following two repos deb https://mirrors.ebi.ac.uk/CRAN/bin/linux/ubuntu xenial-cran35 deb http://uk-mirrors.evowise.com/ubuntu/ bionic-backports main restricted universe but

On Wed, May 16, 2018 at 6:24 AM, Dirk Eddelbuettel <edd at debian.org> wrote: > > On 16 May 2018 at 11:59, Jeroen Ooms wrote: > | As of today many Travis users are seeing this error: > | > | The following packages have unmet dependencies: > | libmagick++-dev : Depends: libmagickcore-dev (= > | 8:6.7.7.10-6ubuntu3.9) but it is not going to be installed > |

Hi, I''m a long ext3 user (rpmfind.net). I propagated ext3 on some of our server box (W3C webservers are ext3 based too now). I might be tempted of testing out your kernel RPMs but unavailability or the source RPM and the SMP version are definite showstoppers. Please provide them. In the meantime I will stick to my own set of kernel ext3 RPMs at ftp://rpmfind.net/pub/veillard/ext3/

Hi Robin, Thanks for asking here rather than on Twitter. I am old-school and think this is a better place / more searchable / more easy to expand. On 2 May 2018 at 09:35, Robin Lovelace wrote: | I'd be interested to hear views on how and when Ubuntu users should upgrade | to R 3.5.0. | | I made the upgrade a few days ago but reverted because of issues installing | packages such as rJava,

For a month I've been trying to get ActiveX controls working from the ToolkitCMA.com site with IE6. Some serious weirdness going on. So now I check what I look like at http://bellsnwhistles.com/bells.html, and it informs me that: "The Browser you are using is Microsoft Internet Explorer (Mozilla) 4.0 (compatible; MSIE 6.0; Windows 98)" Eh no, I check Help|About IE, and it

On 5/20/18 9:04 AM, Dirk Eddelbuettel wrote: > > On 20 May 2018 at 09:34, Robin Lovelace wrote: > | Thanks for keeping us updated. Before I jump the gun and put this out on > | social media (as a follow-up to this tweet > | https://twitter.com/robinlovelace/status/990682038373158912 ), would you > | say this is a reasonable message to send to the R-using Ubuntu community?: >

Dear Email user, Your email address samba@samba.org was harvested by a SPAM robot. It got your address from the webpage http://us1.samba.org/samba/docs/man/smb.conf.5.html For mor information about SPAM Robots and how you can protect yourself, Click Here http://www.email-cloak.com/default.asp?ID=396631&T=35429 Sincerely, Champ Mitchell Anti-Spam Services http://www.email-cloak.com

Quoting Joseph Tam <jtam.home at gmail.com>: > Another privacy plugin that assumes the server operator is unmotivated or > respects your privacy anyways, and won't just skim your password right off > the top to look at your mail. A vault with steel walls and a dirt floor. *SIGH* As usual, you're right on the money, Joseph. I used to let things like this