similar to: Font Size for View()

Thanks for the feedback. At least on Windows, the font size for View() appears to be controlled by the font size specified under the Rgui preferences / Rconsole. I thought that under Linux, it might be controlled by some .Xresources/.Xdefaults setting. Ok, will wait for a bit but if nobody else has any suggestions, I'll ask on r-devel. Best, Wolfgang -----Original Message----- From: Dirk

Thanks Gabor and Duncan! It works. For those interested, I added this to the beginning of the \details{} section: \if{html}{\out{ <script id="MathJax-script" async src="https://cdn.jsdelivr.net/npm/mathjax at 3/es5/tex-mml-chtml.js"> </script> }} And then I can use: \if{html}{\out{\(B_{x(a,b)} = \int_0^x t^{a-1} (1-t)^{b-1} dt\)}} or

Interesting. I gave this a try, but couldn't make this work. One would have to infuse something like <script id="MathJax-script" async src="https://cdn.jsdelivr.net/npm/mathjax at 3/es5/tex-mml-chtml.js"> </script> or <script id="MathJax-script" async src="<url-to-your-site>/mathjax/tex-chtml.js"> </script> into

Hi All, After some tinkering, and with support from Duncan, I put together a package that allows for easy inclusion of MathJax equations in Rd files. The package has been submitted to CRAN, but those who want to try this out already can get it here: https://github.com/wviechtb/mathjaxr or in other words: install.packages("remotes")

Hello All, I am wondering if there has ever been any discussion/consideration given to incorporating MathJax (or something similar) into R for rendering equations in .Rd files. I know that equations are rendered beautifully in the pdf manuals, but I suspect the majority of users primarily look at the html help files when using R. While I am comfortable reading something like "B_x(a,b) =

I was not sure who I should contact about this, so I am posting this here. There are a few broken links on the R website. 1) http://www.r-project.org/search.html -> link to the Nabble R Forum. I belive the correct/new URL should be: http://r.789695.n4.nabble.com/ 2) http://www.r-project.org/other-docs.html -> link to "Auswertung ?kologischer Daten". Not sure if there is a new

Yes. Thank you; I should have quoted it. I suggest to remove this text or to add the word "not" at the beginning. Arie On Sun, Oct 8, 2017 at 4:38 PM, Viechtbauer Wolfgang (SP) <wolfgang.viechtbauer at maastrichtuniversity.nl> wrote: > Ah, I think you are referring to this part from ?lm: > > "(including the case that there are w_i observations equal to y_i and

Indeed: Using 'weights' is not meant to indicate that the same observation is repeated 'n' times. As I showed, this gives erroneous results. Hence I suggested that it is discouraged rather than encouraged in the Details section of lm in the Reference manual. Arie ---Original Message----- On Sat, 7 Oct 2017, wolfgang.viechtbauer at maastrichtuniversity.nl wrote: Using

OK. We have now three suggestions to repair the text: - remove the text - add "not" at the beginning of the text - add at the end of the text a warning; something like: "Note that in this case the standard estimates of the parameters are in general not correct, and hence also the t values and the p value. Also the number of degrees of freedom is not correct. (The parameter

Dear All, The metafor package currently fails CRAN checks on Sparc Solaris: http://cran.r-project.org/web/checks/check_results_metafor.html The problem is probably due to an unintended (= stupid) use of identical() in a couple tests. I have changed that to more appropriate tests using all.equal(). However, before I resubmit the package to CRAN, I would really like to make sure that the updated

Hello all, I am using forest.rma to plot a random effects model meta-analysis. I noticed that refline sets a vertical line indicating the null hypothesis. Is there a way to draw another vertical line, possibly dashed, centered on the summary estimate? Prof. Viechtbauer, if you happen to read this, I'd like to thank you for making an excellent package. I have been using the metafor package

Hi, Here is (I hope) all the relevant output from R. > mean(s1$ZDEPRESSION, na.rm=T) [1] -1.041546e-16 > mean(s1$ZDIVERSITY_PA, na.rm=T) [1] -9.660583e-16 > mean(s1$ZMEAN_PA, na.rm=T) [1] -5.430282e-15 > lm.ridge(ZDEPRESSION ~ ZMEAN_PA * ZDIVERSITY_PA, data=s1)$coef ZMEAN_PA ZDIVERSITY_PA ZMEAN_PA:ZDIVERSITY_PA -0.3962254 -0.3636026

x <- c(1, 1, 2, 2, 2, 3) y <- c(1, 2, 1, 3, NA, 3) > str(xyTable(x,y)) List of 3 $ x : num [1:6] 1 1 2 2 NA 3 $ y : num [1:6] 1 2 1 3 NA 3 $ number: int [1:6] 1 1 1 NA NA 1 How many (2,3)s do we have? At least one, the third entry, but the fourth entry, (2,NA), is possibly a (2,3) so we don't know and make the count NA. I suspect this is not the intended logic, but a

My laptop is a Dell XPS-13 running CentOS 7.? It has a 13" 1920x1080 screen and it's a bit difficult for my mid-40s eyesight.? Fedora and Debian, on this laptop, give me the option of choosing 1600x900 which is much easier for me to read but CentOS doesn't show this resolution as available. I followed the steps I found in a post on stackexchange using xrandr, substituting

Hi all, Posted this many years ago (https://stat.ethz.ch/pipermail/r-devel/2017-December/075224.html), but either this slipped under the radar or my feeble mind is unable to understand what xyTable() is doing here and nobody bothered to correct me. I now stumbled again across this issue. x <- c(1, 1, 2, 2, 2, 3) y <- c(1, 2, 1, 3, NA, 3) table(x, y, useNA="always") xyTable(x, y)

Dear Dushanthi, Please keep your e-mails on the R-Help list, where Michael has already given you some excellent advice. As Michael already explained, metafor can handle proportions, but does not have any specific functionality for categorical variables with more than 2 levels (at the moment). So, if it is logical and possible to do so, you could collapse the levels of the categorical outcome to 2

This aside, there is the R-sig-meta-analysis mailing list where this probably belongs: https://stat.ethz.ch/mailman/listinfo/r-sig-meta-analysis Best, Wolfgang >-----Original Message----- >From: R-help [mailto:r-help-bounces at r-project.org] On Behalf Of Bert >Gunter >Sent: Thursday, 15 February, 2018 16:49 >To: shaju jacob >Cc: R-help >Subject: Re: [R] Codes to conduct

Peter, This is a highly structured text. Just for the discussion, I separate the building blocks, where (D) and (E) and (F) are new: BEGIN OF TEXT -------------------- (A) Non-?NULL? ?weights? can be used to indicate that different observations have different variances (with the values in ?weights? being inversely proportional to the variances); (B) or equivalently, when the elements of

I would suggest to post this to the (recently created) R-sig-meta-analysis mailing list. See: https://stat.ethz.ch/mailman/listinfo/r-sig-meta-analysis Best, Wolfgang >-----Original Message----- >From: R-help [mailto:r-help-bounces at r-project.org] On Behalf Of Naike Wang >Sent: Monday, June 26, 2017 08:32 >To: R-help at r-project.org >Subject: [R] Classic fail-safe N >

Hi, I have been looking for an R package which allowed to do meta-analysis (both pairwise and network/mixed-treatment) at arm-level rather than at trial-level, the latter being the common way in which meta-analysis is done. By arm-level meta-analysis I mean one that accounts for data provided at the level of the individual arms of each trial and that does not simply derive the difference between