similar to: Updating R 3.4.0 for ubuntu

This sounds like the path of least resistance. I am sure we can work around it for two weeks :) On Fri, 16 Jun 2017 at 00:03 Dirk Eddelbuettel <edd at debian.org> wrote: > > On 15 June 2017 at 04:42, Edward Abraham wrote: > | When R upgraded to 3.4.0, a bug was introduced into the Sweave command > (it > | returned an exit code of 1, even on success), which has broken our

On 15 June 2017 at 04:42, Edward Abraham wrote: | When R upgraded to 3.4.0, a bug was introduced into the Sweave command (it | returned an exit code of 1, even on success), which has broken our | reporting make files. This has been fixed in the source (thanks to Martin | M?chler). I am using R on ubuntu (xenial) and was wondering if the 3.4.0 | binary could be updated with the patched version, so

I removed my r-base package and installed it through the guide in Cran mirror but I am still getting the same error. Here is the output to the command above: r-base-core: Installed: 3.4.4-1xenial0 Candidate: 3.4.4-1xenial0 Version table: *** 3.4.4-1xenial0 500 500 https://ftp.ussg.iu.edu/CRAN/bin/linux/ubuntu xenial/ Packages 100 /var/lib/dpkg/status 3.4.3-1xenial0 500

Th output to which R : /home/bzamanlooy/anaconda3/bin/R The output to R --version: R version 3.4.3 (2017-11-30) -- "Kite-Eating Tree" Copyright (C) 2017 The R Foundation for Statistical Computing Platform: x86_64-pc-linux-gnu (64-bit) R is free software and comes with ABSOLUTELY NO WARRANTY. You are welcome to redistribute it under the terms of the GNU General Public License versions 2

Please be careful with upgrades to R 3.4.2. To cut a long story short, this has to do with minor internal changes in R 3.4.0 from April which require _some_ packages to be rebuilt. I argued for that approach (ie: incremental, careful, no side effects) within Debian, and lost. The _official_ packages in Debian now carry a new tag r-api-3.4 (as opposed to previous r-api-3) in order to force clean

Corrected packages are now on the RRutter PPA ( https://launchpad.net/~marutter/+archive/ubuntu/rrutter) and soon on CRAN mirrors. If you have any issues or questions, please let me know. Michael On Fri, Sep 29, 2017 at 8:50 AM, Dirk Eddelbuettel <edd at debian.org> wrote: > > So I now have this on my laptop > > edd at brad:~$ apt-cache policy r-base-core >

I just installed R 3.4.4 and Rstudio on my computer with the OS Ubuntu 16.04. Rstudio detects the Installation of R and works normally. However, trying to run R in the terminal I get this error: *Fatal error: unable to open the base package* I have trying setting the R_HOME using: *export R_HOME=/usr/lib/R* However it did not work. Any idea how to resolve this? Ps. I have used r-bloggers

On 27 April 2017 at 12:01, Johannes Ranke wrote: | | > so it seems to me this must affect all packages in Debian sid that were | > built before the release of R 3.4.0! | | or rather before 14 April 2017, which is when R from revision r72510 was | uploaded to sid as pre-release candidate. Another example with KernSmooth: > library(KernSmooth) KernSmooth 2.23 loaded Copyright

Martin, Thanks for taking a quick look. Yes it looks like it must be something local. I've done the following to make sure I have a clean box: reboot sudo apt-get update sudo apt-get upgrade Rerun the "svn up" command and do a make distclean svn up tools/rsync-recommended ./configure make The problem persists in 2017-09-01 r73179 I pulled the source

On 27 April 2017 at 13:58, Johannes Ranke wrote: | Am Donnerstag, 27. April 2017, 06:32:13 schrieb Dirk Eddelbuettel: | > On 27 April 2017 at 12:01, Johannes Ranke wrote: | > | > so it seems to me this must affect all packages in Debian sid that were | > | > built before the release of R 3.4.0! | > | | > | or rather before 14 April 2017, which is when R from revision r72510

Thanks for the reply Mr. Eddelbuettel. However I somehow couldn't manage to solve the problem completely. So I cleaned the sources.list file so taht the output is this: sudo apt-get update Hit:1 http://tr.archive.ubuntu.com/ubuntu xenial InRelease Hit:2 http://tr.archive.ubuntu.com/ubuntu xenial-updates InRelease???????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????? Hit:3

Hi, I am running a dual-booted Ubuntu 16.04 from a USB stick and having problems installing R. I have been following the steps at this site: https://www.datascienceriot.com/how-to-install-r-in-linux-ubuntu-16-04-xenial-xerus/kris/ Below is the the output and the commands from the terminal: sudo echo "deb http://cran.rstudio.com/bin/linux/ubuntu xenial/" | sudo tee -a

Michael, ESS broke again on my laptop after I upgraded to Ubuntu 18.10. The elpa-ess package seems to be provided multiple times, sadly the one with xenial (16.04) in its name wins ... and breaks the setup. I one for cosmic, I had one from bionic (18.04), but because the names 'wrapped' the 'x' wins over 'b' and 'c'. We had talked about that in the past, it

Hello All, When I try to install r-base-dev on my Ubuntu 16.04 it gives me the following error r-base-dev : Depends: dh-r but it is not installable E: Unable to correct problems, you have held broken packages. I added the following two repos deb https://mirrors.ebi.ac.uk/CRAN/bin/linux/ubuntu xenial-cran35 deb http://uk-mirrors.evowise.com/ubuntu/ bionic-backports main restricted universe but

On 12 May 2016 at 09:17, Erol Biceroglu wrote: | Side question... would this have anything to do with 16.04 being new and | (potentially) "less stable" than 14.04?? Or put another way, would this issue | come up under 14.04? No. User error (with apt-config files) is orthogonal to release quality. And FWIW some people seem to be quite positive on 16.04:

I noticed that R 4.0.0 is now available for ubuntu on CRAN. I attempted to do a clean install on 18.04 using: sudo apt install r-base after adding deb https://cloud.r-project.org/bin/linux/ubuntu bionic-cran40/ to /etc/apt/sources.list. Unfortunately, apt reports that r-recommend is a dependency and it won't be installed. Upon inspecting the R4.0 repos r-recommend is missing not only for

Am Donnerstag, 27. April 2017, 15:05:32 schrieb J C Nash: > Is there a reason for jessie-cran3 rather than xenial? For Linux Mint 18 > (admittedly not 18.1) I have > > deb https://cloud.r-project.org/bin/linux/ubuntu xenial/ > > as one of the apt entries. > > JN Seconded. You should not expect that mixing apt entries for Ubuntu and Debian will work. > > It

Dear Debian persons I would like enquire about whether the repository deb https://cloud.r-project.org/bin/linux/ubuntu bionic-cran35/ I tried to follow the instructions and I cannot get R3.5.1 - I get R3.4.4??? I have been able to install R3.5.1 on Ubuntu 16.02 using the xenial-cran35/ repository & so not sure if the bionic link is up to date? thanks in advance Regards Alison

Hi, We noticed that "cosmic-cran35" recently went missing from http://cran.rstudio.com/bin/linux/ubuntu/ (apparently in mirrors as well). Was cosmic support removed? It still seems to be in the readme file. Mark Walker, PhD Computational Biologist Methods Group, Data Science Platform The Broad Institute Cambridge, MA [[alternative HTML version deleted]]

I'd be interested to hear views on how and when Ubuntu users should upgrade to R 3.5.0. I made the upgrade a few days ago but reverted because of issues installing packages such as rJava, which I installed on the system with r-cran-rjava. Also any advice on how to do a clean uninstall of the previous version before making the leap greatly appreciated. Thank you. Robin [[alternative HTML