similar to: BLAS/LAPACK routine 'DLASCL' gave error code -4 in liblapack3 Version 3.5.0

Dear Madlene, while this list serves as a forum for discussions about R backports present on CRAN, this would be something preferably filed in the Debian bug tracking system bts.debian.org - could you file a bug there? But please don't ask me on which package - maybe Dirk has a good answer to that one... Cheers, Johannes P.S.: https://www.debian.org/Bugs/Reporting Am Dienstag, 16.

On 16 December 2014 at 14:45, Johannes Ranke wrote: | this list serves as a forum for discussions about R backports present on CRAN, The mandate, as I recall, is a little broader: "usage of R on Debian-based systems" As such, I found the post perfectly adequate. We redirect from r-help and other lists to here because it is the one focus point for all things related to Debian / Ubuntu

On Fri, 1 Feb 2002, Tony Fagan wrote: > I downloaded your RPM and tried installing it on Madrake 8.1. > It failed and said it could not find: > > libblas.so.3 To install these, from console as root do: urpmi liblapack3 > libgcc_s.so.1 > libgcc_s.so.1 (GLIBC_2.0) urpmi libgcc3 -- Michele Alzetta

Dear Debian Xen Team, The following possible problem(s) were detected in the package(s) you maintain in Debian: === xen-unstable: = This package has not been in testing for 353 days. = This package has not been able to migrate from unstable to testing for 353 days. See <http://bjorn.haxx.se/debian/testing.pl?package=xen-unstable> This is an automated mail. These mails are sent

Package: xen-unstable Version: 3.3-unstable+hg17879-1 Severity: serious User: debian-qa at lists.debian.org Usertags: qa-ftbfs-20080702 qa-ftbfs Justification: FTBFS on i386 Hi, During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build on i386. Relevant part: > make[5]: Entering directory

Package: xen-utils-common Version: 3.0.3-0-1 Severity: serious Justification: makes package uninstallable Usertags: grid5000 Hi, During a piuparts run over all the packages in etch, I ran into a problem with your package: Setting up xen-utils-common (3.0.3-0-1) ... ln: creating symbolic link `/etc/udev/rules.d/z60_xen-backend.rules' to `../xen-backend.rules': No such file or directory

> | Is there a way to overcome this problem? Precompiled versions of R can be installed on various system configurations, so I guess that there should be a way to compile it in a version-agnostic manner. > > Yes, for example by > > -- using a Docker container which is portable across OSs (!!) and versions Docker R containers are north of 250 MB. I have checked experimentally

Source: xen Version: 4.0.1-2 Severity: serious Tags: wheezy sid User: debian-qa at lists.debian.org Usertags: qa-ftbfs-20110313 qa-ftbfs Justification: FTBFS on amd64 Hi, During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build on amd64. Relevant part: > make[3]: Entering directory `/build/user-xen_4.0.1-2-amd64-2x64p6/xen-4.0.1/debian/build/build-docs/docs' > latex

Thanks for the advice. Going to look into this more this evening and hopefully get everything working. Thanks again! On Thu, Nov 5, 2015 at 11:56 AM, Dirk Eddelbuettel <edd at debian.org> wrote: > > On 5 November 2015 at 11:44, Michael Coyne wrote: > | What do you have installed as far as libcurl goes? Would you mind > | listing your packages and greping for libcurl entries.

Package: xen-unstable Version: 3.0-unstable+hg11561-1 Severity: serious Build-depends on linux-support-2.6.17-2, which is no longer available in sid. -- Stephen R. Marenka If life's not fun, you're not doing it right! <stephen@marenka.net> -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: not available Type: application/pgp-signature Size:

Hi, I have dowloaded the rpm file for Mandrake 8.1 and when I try to install it a message asking for 'libblas.so.3' prompts out. I've search through www.rpmfind.net and freshmeat.net for the file, but I couldn't find it. System: Mandrake linux 8.1 AMD Duron Thanks in advance Antonio Rodr?guez -.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-

Hello! I'm trying to install R-3.0.1 on an Ubuntu machine (64 bit, version 13.04). I have uninstalled and installed several times, but to no avail. I keep getting errors about missing ldpaths, and installing packages does not work at all. Here is the information: erin@erin-Lenovo-IdeaPad-Y480:~$ sudo apt-get install r-base Reading package lists... Done Building dependency tree Reading

Source: xen Version: 4.1.2-3 Severity: serious Tags: wheezy sid User: debian-qa at lists.debian.org Usertags: qa-ftbfs-20120321 qa-ftbfs Justification: FTBFS on amd64 Hi, During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build on amd64. Relevant part: > make[7]: Entering directory `/?PKGBUILDDIR?/debian/build/build-utils_amd64/tools/firmware' > /usr/bin/make -C etherboot

Hi, AFAIK, the status of Xen in lenny is currently the following: - no dom0 kernel - domU kernel only for i386 (no domU kernel for amd64) I was told (I don't remember where) that this is because the vanilla kernel only supports domU for i386, and has no dom0 support, so distros have to port the patches to their kernels (please correct me if I'm wrong). However: - etch shipped with dom0

Hi, I tried to compile R with openblas on a ubuntu 12.04 machine. I have to say that I normally use the package system and that I have no experience with compiling R. I did the following: ./configure --enable-BLAS-shlib --enable-R-shlib LIBnn=lib --with-blas="-L/usr/lib/openblas-base/ -lopenblas" --enable-memory-profiling --with-x=yes go the output: R is now configured for

Source: xcp-storage-managers Version: 0.1.1-3 Severity: serious Tags: jessie sid User: debian-qa at lists.debian.org Usertags: qa-ftbfs-20130509 qa-ftbfs Justification: FTBFS on amd64 Hi, During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build on amd64. Relevant part: > cc -O2 -I/usr/include/python2.6 -I/usr/include -fPIC -c -o xslib_wrap.o xslib_wrap.c >

Source: xen-api-libs Version: 0.5.2-3 Severity: serious Tags: jessie sid User: debian-qa at lists.debian.org Usertags: qa-ftbfs-20130620 qa-ftbfs Justification: FTBFS on amd64 Hi, During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build on amd64. Relevant part: > make[2]: Entering directory `/?PKGBUILDDIR?/stdext' > ocamlfind ocamlc -I ../xml-light2 -I ../stdext -I

Hello and apologies if this doesn't belong here. I'm trying to build a "portable" version of R - "portable" means that it could be easily moved to another location or machine simply by copying it. However, I encountered a problem when running it elsewhere: it seems that versions of dynamic libraries used by R are fixed and set at the build time; when that instance of R

I just essentially the same question on this mailing list and the problem ended up being that my cpu's architecture was not supported by the ubuntu releases (or any releases for that matter). I had to build R from source, but it wasn't much headache. The Ubuntu releases only support i386 and amd64 --- i.e. 32 bit & 64 bit intel and amd cpus and not, e.g., the arm cpus that are

Dear Debian Xen Team, The following possible problem(s) were detected in the package(s) you maintain in Debian: xen-unstable: This package has not been in testing for more than 196 days. This is an semi-automated mail. These mails will be sent monthly. For more information about these mails, refer to http://wiki.debian.org/qa.debian.org/DdpoByMail We are sorry if this mail was useless for