similar to: R 4.0 for CentOS 7

On 10/30/2020 05:02 AM, I?aki Ucar wrote: > Please, do not crosspost. As I said in the Bugzilla issue, R cannot be > further updated in EPEL-7, see > https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1871685#c2. > > I?aki > > > On Fri, 30 Oct 2020 at 02:30, H <agents at meddatainc.com> wrote: >> I am running R 4.6 under CentOS 7 but would like to upgrade. Just found

Please, see spot's comment in the BZ I linked in my previous comment. The thing is not that it can't be done (you could install a newer devtoolset, v8 or v9, build R and use it), the thing is that it cannot be distributed in EPEL, because we're allowed to build against a devtoolset, but not depend on it, so the distribution would be broken (you could not install packages unless you

On Sat, 31 Oct 2020 at 20:52, H <agents at meddatainc.com> wrote: > > Understood. Since I am running CentOS 7, I guess I could create a CentOS 8 docker container and install R in that? I am not planning to upgrade the system to CentOS 8. Of course, you can do that. With podman it's even easier. But then I'd use Fedora as the base image instead, because you'll enjoy binary

On 10/31/2020 06:54 AM, I?aki Ucar wrote: > Please, see spot's comment in the BZ I linked in my previous comment. > The thing is not that it can't be done (you could install a newer > devtoolset, v8 or v9, build R and use it), the thing is that it cannot > be distributed in EPEL, because we're allowed to build against a > devtoolset, but not depend on it, so the

On Wed, 24 Oct 2018 at 11:40, Kurt Hornik <Kurt.Hornik at wu.ac.at> wrote: > > >>>>> Kurt Wheeler writes: > > Try e.g. > > https://cran.r-project.org/package=httr&version=1.3.1 > https://cran.r-project.org/package=httr&version=1.3.0 This is a nice feature that I didn't know. I recently proposed enforcing this scheme in Fedora's packaging

Please, do not crosspost. As I said in the Bugzilla issue, R cannot be further updated in EPEL-7, see https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1871685#c2. I?aki On Fri, 30 Oct 2020 at 02:30, H <agents at meddatainc.com> wrote: > > I am running R 4.6 under CentOS 7 but would like to upgrade. Just found that 4.0 is available for CentOS 8 but could it be released for CentOS 7 as

Maybe Elliott? On Tue, 23 Jun 2020 at 15:01, Tom Callaway <spotrh at gmail.com> wrote: > > At this point, I simply don't have the time. > > Tom > > On Tue, Jun 23, 2020, 6:06 AM I?aki Ucar <iucar at fedoraproject.org> wrote: >> >> On Tue, 9 Jun 2020 at 10:21, I?aki Ucar <iucar at fedoraproject.org> wrote: >> > >> > > Given

Hi folks, As expected of a new major release of R, there is a break in compatibility for R packages. From the NEWS entry for 4.0.0: Packages need to be (re-)installed under this version (4.0.0) of R. This has two impacts on Fedora/EPEL. 1. Users who update to 4.0.0 will need to rebuild any/all packages installed from CRAN. 2. Fedora/EPEL R packages will need to be rebuilt for 4.0.0. For

On Tue, 9 Jun 2020 at 10:21, I?aki Ucar <iucar at fedoraproject.org> wrote: > > > Given the huge amount of builds (and rebuilds) in this process, I am > > strongly disinclined to attempt this work for Fedora 32 (the idea of > > hundreds of bodhi overrides does not fill me with joy), but I would not > > prevent someone else who wished to try to do so. > > Note

Thanks, Jos? and Elliott. I can help with reviews. I attach here a list of batches of CRAN packages to be rebuilt in order (batches separated by a blank line), and the script that generates it. Hope it helps. I?aki On Wed, 24 Jun 2020 at 11:35, Elliott Sales de Andrade <quantum.analyst at gmail.com> wrote: > > I could do so, but it wouldn't be until this weekend. > > Also,

Hi all, Three months ago, I wrote to Martyn Plummer (to his Warwick email) and offered my help to maintain and modernize this [1] rather updated README, but received no response. Does anyone know how to reach him, or maybe I should contact CRAN directly? [1] https://cran.r-project.org/bin/linux/redhat/README Regards, -- I?aki ?car

On Mon, 29 Jun 2020 at 14:25, Jos? Ab?lio Matos <jamatos at fc.up.pt> wrote: > > Again you guessed right, that was the main idea. :-) > As I told above and to reiterate it, the idea of this work is to make it easier to automate the > process. Similarly to how we do the mass builds for all the packages. But the mass rebuild process is very different, because releng doesn't

BTW, meanwhile, you can install rstudio-server and use RStudio in your browser at http://localhost:8787 I?aki On Sun, 3 Nov 2024 at 22:10, I?aki Ucar <iucar at fedoraproject.org> wrote: > It is unlikely to be a packaging issue. I suggest you open a bug report > here: https://github.com/rstudio/rstudio/issues. > > I?aki > > On Sun, 3 Nov 2024 at 22:04, Paul Smith

On Tue, 7 Jul 2020 at 15:58, Jos? Ab?lio Matos <jamatos at fc.up.pt> wrote: > > On Tuesday, 7 July 2020 11.44.48 WEST I?aki Ucar wrote: > > Try with the CLI (see "man bodhi"): > > > > $ bodhi updates edit <update> --addbuilds <builds> > > I found that the best call in this case is instead of --addbuilds to use > --from-tag since then

Hi, R has been built against FlexiBLAS in rawhide [1, 2]. These are the R packages that need to be rebuilt: R-ape-0:5.4-2.fc33.x86_64 R-expm-0:0.999.4-7.fc33.x86_64 R-gee-0:4.13.20-4.fc33.x86_64 R-gss-0:2.2.2-3.fc33.x86_64 R-igraph-0:1.2.5-3.fc33.x86_64 R-msm-0:1.6.8-5.fc33.x86_64 R-preprocessCore-0:1.50.0-4.fc33.x86_64 R-qtl-0:1.46.2-4.fc33.x86_64 R-quadprog-0:1.5.8-5.fc33.x86_64 Could

Thanks, I?aki, for your answer. Yes, I do have a GPU: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650/PCIe/SSE2 NVIDIA Corporation 4.6.0 NVIDIA 560.35.03 And no progress: $ rstudio GSK_RENDERER=ngl [18088:1103/205442.538796:ERROR:gl_factory.cc(120)] Requested GL implementation (gl=none,angle=none) not found in allowed implementations: [(gl=egl-angle,angle=default),(gl=egl-gles2,angle=none)].

It is unlikely to be a packaging issue. I suggest you open a bug report here: https://github.com/rstudio/rstudio/issues. I?aki On Sun, 3 Nov 2024 at 22:04, Paul Smith <phhs80 at gmail.com> wrote: > Thanks, but unfortunately no progress: > > $ GSK_RENDERER=ngl rstudio > > [19496:1103/210330.025303:ERROR:gl_factory.cc(120)] Requested GL > implementation

On February 22, 2020 9:02:05 PM EST, "bryn1u85 ." <m.bryn1u at gmail.com> wrote: >The Nextcloud has more features and all are for free. The ownCloud has >some >for enterprise features which are paid. Soo i think the choice is >clear. > >niedz., 23 lut 2020 o 02:35 H <agents at meddatainc.com> napisa?(a): > >> I am planning to install either ownCloud

On 02/14/2019 08:19 PM, Stephen John Smoogen wrote: > On Thu, 14 Feb 2019 at 13:25, Stephen John Smoogen <smooge at gmail.com> wrote: >> On Thu, 14 Feb 2019 at 12:47, H <agents at meddatainc.com> wrote: >>> On 02/14/2019 05:58 PM, Tate Belden wrote: >>>> FWIW, on Fedora 29, I'm running Geany 1.34.1 and didn't have to enable >>>>

On Tue, 7 Jul 2020 at 12:38, Jos? Ab?lio Matos <jamatos at fc.up.pt> wrote: > > On Monday, 6 July 2020 21.08.53 WEST Tom Callaway wrote: > > R-BiocFileCache is now branched for f32 (finally). You should be able to > > build it if/when the PDC comes back up. Lotta random outages right now. > > > > Tom > > I have re/built them using the side tag but I do not