similar to: Problem with the update to R 4.0.2 in the Fedora users' list

I'm inclined to agree. Users are expecting that things they install manually will override the system default (if any). Tom On Tue, Jul 21, 2020, 11:39 AM I?aki Ucar <iucar at fedoraproject.org> wrote: > On Tue, 21 Jul 2020 at 17:17, Jos? Ab?lio Matos <jamatos at fc.up.pt> wrote: > > > > There was a thread this weekend in the fedora users' mailing list where

On Tue, 21 Jul 2020 at 17:17, Jos? Ab?lio Matos <jamatos at fc.up.pt> wrote: > > There was a thread this weekend in the fedora users' mailing list where a user > had problems updating R 4.0.2: > > "non-rpm R libraries not accessible now w R v 4.0.x" > https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/users at lists.fedoraproject.org/ >

On Tue, 7 Jul 2020 at 12:38, Jos? Ab?lio Matos <jamatos at fc.up.pt> wrote: > > On Monday, 6 July 2020 21.08.53 WEST Tom Callaway wrote: > > R-BiocFileCache is now branched for f32 (finally). You should be able to > > build it if/when the PDC comes back up. Lotta random outages right now. > > > > Tom > > I have re/built them using the side tag but I do not

I am at loss here R-data.table fails to rebuild, the failure happens in the tests where 3 are failing. https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=46195243 I will continue with the rebuild and let this case to look later or if anyone could help I would appreciate. :-) Regards, -- Jos? Ab?lio

Over the last several days, I've been working hard to get all of the Fedora R packages rebuilt against R 4.0 in rawhide (in the F33-R-4 side tag). With the exception of R-biomaRt, R-BSgenome, R-GenomicAlignments, and R-rtracklayer, I believe everything is built and updated to the latest versions. And of those packages, they're all ready to go when Fedora infrastructure is working reliably

On Tue, 14 Jul 2020 at 01:19, Jos? Ab?lio Matos <jamatos at fc.up.pt> wrote: > > On Saturday, 11 July 2020 11.32.32 WEST Jos? Ab?lio Matos wrote: > > If I do not hear until then I will push the update Monday night (Western > > Europe time zone. > > Well I tried but I did not succeeded both using the web interface and cli > interfaces: > >

I tried R2spec to create the spec files necessary to have Rcpparmadillo. I noticed that it has some issues, one example is that it placed some files irrespectively if they were present in the tar or not. One functionality that I think it would be nice to have would to update a given spec file with the updated dependencies. What do you think of this? Regards, -- Jos? Ab?lio [[alternative

On Fri, 3 Jul 2020 at 19:03, Jos? Ab?lio Matos <jamatos at fc.up.pt> wrote: > > On Monday, 29 June 2020 13.46.02 WEST I?aki Ucar wrote: > > But the mass rebuild process is very different, because releng doesn't > > follow any particular order (they don't need to, because nothing > > really changed). > > > > The question is whether there is any tool

On Thursday, 9 July 2020 21.25.05 WEST I?aki Ucar wrote: > CRAN rebuilt on Copr. Ready to push to stable. The update also has the karma necessary to be pushed to stable. Does any one has any objection for this to be pushed to stable? If I do not hear until then I will push the update Monday night (Western Europe time zone, and yes we are in the Summer and the days are larger) in time for

R-BiocFileCache is now branched for f32 (finally). You should be able to build it if/when the PDC comes back up. Lotta random outages right now. Tom On Mon, Jul 6, 2020 at 10:40 AM Jos? Ab?lio Matos <jamatos at fc.up.pt> wrote: > On Tuesday, 9 June 2020 03.40.52 WEST Tom Callaway wrote: > > Over the last several days, I've been working hard to get all of the > Fedora >

On Tue, 7 Jul 2020 at 15:58, Jos? Ab?lio Matos <jamatos at fc.up.pt> wrote: > > On Tuesday, 7 July 2020 11.44.48 WEST I?aki Ucar wrote: > > Try with the CLI (see "man bodhi"): > > > > $ bodhi updates edit <update> --addbuilds <builds> > > I found that the best call in this case is instead of --addbuilds to use > --from-tag since then

On Mon, 29 Jun 2020 at 14:25, Jos? Ab?lio Matos <jamatos at fc.up.pt> wrote: > > Again you guessed right, that was the main idea. :-) > As I told above and to reiterate it, the idea of this work is to make it easier to automate the > process. Similarly to how we do the mass builds for all the packages. But the mass rebuild process is very different, because releng doesn't

On Tue, 21 Jul 2020 at 11:05, Jos? Ab?lio Matos <jamatos at fc.up.pt> wrote: > > On Friday, 3 July 2020 18.36.17 WEST I?aki Ucar wrote: > > Nice! What if we create a group "R" on Pagure and a repo > > "fedora-scripts" or something like that? > > I would like to improve the scripts but FWIW here it comes a rough version of > the script I used.

On Thu, 25 Jun 2020 at 19:01, Jos? Ab?lio Matos <jamatos at fc.up.pt> wrote: > > On Wednesday, 24 June 2020 10.42.10 WEST I?aki Ucar wrote: > > Thanks, Jos? and Elliott. I can help with reviews. > > > > I attach here a list of batches of CRAN packages to be rebuilt in > > order (batches separated by a blank line), and the script that > > generates it. Hope

On Wednesday, 24 June 2020 10.44.14 WEST I?aki Ucar wrote: > Oh, and maybe in this process we could add to all packages the > requirement on R(ABI) = 4 that Tom implemented. For that we need to start with rawhide and then change the R-rpm-macros package. Probably it should be enough to change the /usr/lib/rpm/R-deps.R script to add Requires: R(ABI)=4.0 I suggest to continue this as is

On Tuesday, 23 June 2020 16.10.07 WEST I?aki Ucar wrote: > 3) For all packages, either merge master into F32 or just increase the > release version and send builds to that side tag *in order*. The part that worries me is the *in order*. :-) Do we need to do bootstrap builds that are later replaced by the real builds? Because other than that it is business as usual. :-) -- Jos? Ab?lio

Thanks, Jos? and Elliott. I can help with reviews. I attach here a list of batches of CRAN packages to be rebuilt in order (batches separated by a blank line), and the script that generates it. Hope it helps. I?aki On Wed, 24 Jun 2020 at 11:35, Elliott Sales de Andrade <quantum.analyst at gmail.com> wrote: > > I could do so, but it wouldn't be until this weekend. > > Also,

On Mon, 29 Jun 2020 at 13:19, Jos? Ab?lio Matos <jamatos at fc.up.pt> wrote: > > On Wednesday, 24 June 2020 10.42.10 WEST I?aki Ucar wrote: > > Thanks, Jos? and Elliott. I can help with reviews. > > > > I attach here a list of batches of CRAN packages to be rebuilt in > > order (batches separated by a blank line), and the script that > > generates it. Hope

On Tuesday, 23 June 2020 14.01.39 WEST Tom Callaway wrote: > At this point, I simply don't have the time. > > Tom What needs to be done and how can the work be streamlined? I asked this since this procedure will happen for other updates (in one year I know but time flies). I am a provenpackager so that I can drive the process. Regards, -- Jos? Ab?lio [[alternative HTML

On Tuesday, 23 June 2020 16.48.53 WEST Tom Callaway wrote: > There are a few of those, but not many. Hi Tom, I noticed that for example in R-assertthat you have used the bcond: %bcond_with check would not it be better to use bootstrap instead to take advantage of: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/packaging-guidelines/#bootstrapping I am asking for curiosity since from now on we will