Displaying 20 results from an estimated 1000 matches similar to: "Error: rebuild R-data.table on F32 for R 4.0.2"
2016 Feb 29
2
docker 1.10.2 available
Docker 1.10.2 has just been built for virt7-docker-common-candidate
https://cbs.centos.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=78901
Please give it a shot and lemme know if I can proceed with releasing it.
Thanks,
--
Lokesh
Freenode: lsm5
GPG: 0xC7C3A0DD
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 819 bytes
Desc: not
2016 Mar 01
2
docker 1.10.2 available
On Tue, Mar 01, 2016 at 12:43:32PM -0500, Jason Brooks wrote:
> I'm getting this dep error trying to install this:
>
> Error: Package: 1:docker-1.10.2-5.git0f5ac89.el7.x86_64 (virt7-docker-common-candidate)
> Requires: selinux-policy >= 3.13.1-114
> Removing: selinux-policy-3.13.1-60.el7.noarch (@anaconda)
> selinux-policy =
2009 Feb 23
0
[LLVMdev] 2.5 Pre-release1 available for testing
On Fri, Feb 6, 2009 at 8:42 PM, Tanya Lattner <tonic at nondot.org> wrote:
> LLVMers,
>
> The 2.5 pre-release is available for testing:
> http://llvm.org/prereleases/2.5/
>
I'm updating the Fedora packaging of LLVM, and with the 02/20
prerelease it fails to build on ppc64:
http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=1148023
make[1]: Entering directory
2009 Sep 07
1
[LLVMdev] LLVM 2.6 pre1: test failures on Fedora 11.91 (Rawhide) ppc
Hello,
I'm updating Fedora's LLVM to the latest 2.6 prerelease, and
experiencing test failures on ppc. On x86_64 and x86_32 all tests pass
as expected.
http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=1660661
(see root.log to see what packages are installed for the build, and
build.log for the build log -- 'make check' is called towards the end.
Thanks,
--
Michel Alexandre
2020 Jan 10
2
[PATCH Fedora libguestfs v3] Don't depend on libvirt-daemon-kvm
v3 adds libvirt-daemon-driver-storage-core too as a
Recommends.
Dan, there is a scratch build ongoing here:
https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=40377285
Rich.
2011 Aug 12
1
ANNOUNCE: hivex 1.2.8 - A library for reading and writing Windows Registry hive files
I'm pleased to announce the next release of hivex, a library and some
tools for reading and writing Windows Registry hive files.
Man page: http://libguestfs.org/hivex.3.html
Source: http://libguestfs.org/download/hivex/
Git repo: http://git.annexia.org/?p=hivex.git;a=summary
Fedora pkg: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=3267857
This release mainly contains bug fixes.
2019 Dec 06
2
OCaml 4.09.0 rebuild complete in Rawhide (was: Re: OCaml 4.09.0 will be added to Fedora 32 via a side tag)
This is now complete and soon the new packages will be merged into
Fedora Rawhide:
https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2019-2e0b2d6395
A few non-critical packages failed to build, and I will look at these
later unless someone gets around to it before me. The failures are
listed at the end.
Notable changes:
- Release notes: https://ocaml.org/releases/4.09.0.html
- ocaml-camlp4
2020 Jul 31
5
nbdkit build failure in Koji
Hi Eric,
I wonder if you have any thoughts about this build failure in
tests/test-nozero.sh?
https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=48259627
log: https://kojipkgs.fedoraproject.org//work/tasks/9762/48259762/build.log
The error is “nozero6.img was trimmed by mistake”. I added “set -x”
to the script earlier today so we can see exactly what's wrong, and it
is that:
++ stat
2017 May 26
2
Three new releases
Hi Peter,
The latest commit on master should solve the issue:
https://git.xiph.org/?p=opus.git;a=commitdiff;h=4507637cc
Let me know if it doesn't.
Cheers,
Jean-Marc
On 25/05/17 07:40 AM, Peter Robinson wrote:
> Hi Jean-Marc,
>
>> I'm announcing two new releases of opus, along with the first release of
>> the new libopusenc library.
>>
>> First for opus,
2017 May 24
3
Three new releases
Hi,
I'm announcing two new releases of opus, along with the first release of
the new libopusenc library.
First for opus, we just fixed a bad bug in the surround encoding code
that would cause very bad quality on signals beyond a certain amplitude.
Thanks to Franziska Trojahn and others from HfT Leipzig for finding this
issue through their listening test[1] (the quality of the two bad files
2019 Dec 07
0
Re: OCaml 4.09.0 rebuild complete in Rawhide (was: Re: OCaml 4.09.0 will be added to Fedora 32 via a side tag)
On Fri, Dec 06, 2019 at 04:14:12PM -0700, Jerry James wrote:
> On Fri, Dec 6, 2019 at 9:31 AM Richard W.M. Jones <rjones@redhat.com> wrote:
>
> > A few non-critical packages failed to build, and I will look at these
> > later unless someone gets around to it before me. The failures are
> > listed at the end.
> >
> [snip]
>
> > ocaml-tplib
>
2008 Jun 13
5
v1.1.rc10 released
http://dovecot.org/releases/1.1/rc/dovecot-1.1.rc10.tar.gz
http://dovecot.org/releases/1.1/rc/dovecot-1.1.rc10.tar.gz.sig
v1.1.0 will be released on next Friday if nothing horrible happens.
* LIST X-STATUS renamed to LIST STATUS and fixed its behavior with
LIST-EXTENDED options. It's now compatible with STATUS-IN-LIST
draft 00.
- Message parsing could have sometimes produced
2008 Jun 13
5
v1.1.rc10 released
http://dovecot.org/releases/1.1/rc/dovecot-1.1.rc10.tar.gz
http://dovecot.org/releases/1.1/rc/dovecot-1.1.rc10.tar.gz.sig
v1.1.0 will be released on next Friday if nothing horrible happens.
* LIST X-STATUS renamed to LIST STATUS and fixed its behavior with
LIST-EXTENDED options. It's now compatible with STATUS-IN-LIST
draft 00.
- Message parsing could have sometimes produced
2016 Mar 21
2
Re: [PATCH v2 0/7] tests/qemu: Add program for tracing and analyzing boot times.
On Mon, Mar 21, 2016 at 01:18:55PM +0000, Richard W.M. Jones wrote:
> On Mon, Mar 21, 2016 at 01:16:28PM +0000, Richard W.M. Jones wrote:
> > On Mon, Mar 21, 2016 at 02:14:19PM +0100, Kashyap Chamarthy wrote:
> > > I gave this series a spin, along a custom QEMU, and `supermin` from Git,
> > > for my `libguestfs-test-tool` itself fails with:
> > >
> > >
2015 Oct 31
3
About ecryptfs-utils
Hi folks,
I've found ecryptfs module into kernel-plus, but ecryptfs-utils is missing:
[root at centos7 ecryptfs-utils-108]# uname -r
3.10.0-229.14.1.el7.centos.plus.x86_64
[root at centos7 ecryptfs-utils-108]# lsmod | grep ecryptfs
ecryptfs 85424 0
[root at centos7 ecryptfs-utils-108]# yum -q repolist
id del repositorio nombre del
repositorio
2016 Jun 04
2
problems compiling packages | 3.3.0 | Linux
Updated my R install on my GNU/Linux boxes (running CentOS 6.8) from
3.2.x -> 3.3.0, using latest from epel (i.e., not compiling from
source), and while said upgrade seemed to go fine, am now (post-upgrade)
having all sorts of problems with getting some (but not all) packages to
compile (either during an initial install attempt, or upgrade to
existing packages).
For example, if I try to
2020 Jul 14
2
R 4.0.0 rebuild status
On Tue, 14 Jul 2020 at 01:19, Jos? Ab?lio Matos <jamatos at fc.up.pt> wrote:
>
> On Saturday, 11 July 2020 11.32.32 WEST Jos? Ab?lio Matos wrote:
> > If I do not hear until then I will push the update Monday night (Western
> > Europe time zone.
>
> Well I tried but I did not succeeded both using the web interface and cli
> interfaces:
>
>
2018 Feb 27
2
[Gluster-Maintainers] Release 4.0: RC1 tagged
On 02/26/2018 02:03 PM, Shyam Ranganathan wrote:
> Hi,
>
> RC1 is tagged in the code, and the request for packaging the same is on
> its way.
>
> We should have packages as early as today, and request the community to
> test the same and return some feedback.
>
> We have about 3-4 days (till Thursday) for any pending fixes and the
> final release to happen, so
2020 Jul 07
3
R 4.0.0 rebuild status
On Tue, 7 Jul 2020 at 12:38, Jos? Ab?lio Matos <jamatos at fc.up.pt> wrote:
>
> On Monday, 6 July 2020 21.08.53 WEST Tom Callaway wrote:
> > R-BiocFileCache is now branched for f32 (finally). You should be able to
> > build it if/when the PDC comes back up. Lotta random outages right now.
> >
> > Tom
>
> I have re/built them using the side tag but I do not
2020 Jul 03
3
R 4.0.0 rebuild status
On Fri, 3 Jul 2020 at 19:03, Jos? Ab?lio Matos <jamatos at fc.up.pt> wrote:
>
> On Monday, 29 June 2020 13.46.02 WEST I?aki Ucar wrote:
> > But the mass rebuild process is very different, because releng doesn't
> > follow any particular order (they don't need to, because nothing
> > really changed).
> >
> > The question is whether there is any tool