similar to: (no subject)

I have the problem when my localnetwork do telnet to the net Shorewall:FORWARD:REJECT:IN=eth0 OUT=eth2 my files are the following: policy #SOURCE DEST POLICY LOG LEVEL LIMIT:BURST loc net CONTINUE info loc fw ACCEPT info loc loc ACCEPT loc dmz ACCEPT info fw

Hello, when I execute "shorewall hits" command I find this stats: HITS IP DATE ---- --------------- ------ 92099 192.168.0.2 Nov 24 7764 59.104.107.85 Nov 23 3997 192.168.1.77 Nov 24 337 181.50.93.89 Nov 23 331 59.104.156.68 Nov 23 315 99.109.157.73 Nov 23 301 190.225.157.40 Nov 23 275 179.153.183.53 Nov 23 268

Hi everybody! I''m very happy with shorewall, seems to safe my computer well, a little bit to well. But i''m sure it''s a mistake of mine: I can''t get edonkey working! They say that edonkey needs the following ports enabled: 4665 udp in / out 3665,4665,7665,8665 udp out 4661,4662,4666 tcp in thats what i wrote in the rules file: ACCEPT fw net

Dear List! I use a shorewall 2.0.8 on a Debian sarge system. I use a DSL connection to the Internet (ppp0 - eth1 to the modem) and a bridge to the local lan. The bridged config i''ve made with bridge.html from the shorewall site. The Bridge is between local net and a openvpn tap device. This works. I ccan make tunnels, and a can make a lot of things through the firewall. I can get a list

Hi My situation: I have two pc''s with public ip''s (192.159.56.206(webserver) and 84.196.123.65(mail-gateway)) in the dmz. The firewall (84.196.123.66) is configures with proxyarp, so nothing is changed on the pc''s from when they were not behind the firewall (i.e. they don''t have the firewall as gateway (and they each have different gateways, only 84.196.123.65

Hi, I have a install of shorewall I have 2 interfaces(I think) ppp0[connection device] and eth0 [LAN device], I want to allow all traffic from the the internet in or aleast port 80 and CVS and webmin and mail and everything normal to the main machine with shorewall on it. I changed to policy file but it just gave me errors as to double interfaces. I also what still to alow connection sharing

Hello! I am using shorewall shorewall-2.0.11-1 on fedora core2 (iptables-1.2.9-95.7). My box has 2 physical nic´s plus one virt. ipsec interface for a freeswan-vpn connection. A few days ago, portsentry spit out a lot of connections from windows clients (port 135, 445). Ooops. I review my shorewall settings but could not find a mistake. So I took a win-client and established a second

Hi, I am trying to configure the SMTP service on DMZ host. Added the rule: ACCEPT wan dmz:66.58.99.84 tcp pop3 - ACCEPT wan dmz:66.58.99.84 tcp 25 - ACCEPT dmz:66.58.99.84 wan tcp 25 - ACCEPT dmz:66.58.99.84 wan tcp pop3 - issued shorewall clear, shorewall restart, but still couldn''t telnet to the mail server

Hey First, apologies if this went out twice. I sent the original email from an odd email configuration (essentially from an alias of what I signed up as). I searched and noticed that my post did not appear and I did not get a bounce back so I was confused. I waited a few days before resending. So apologies if this goes out twice. I am not trying to spam. I was hoping someone could help me with

Hi, I am getting occasional rejected packets like so: Jul 31 09:52:03 firewall kernel: Shorewall:all2all:REJECT:IN=eth2 OUT=eth0 SRC=192.168.10.91 DST=132.147.22.6 LEN=48 TOS=0x00 PREC=0x00 TTL=127 ID=55364 DF PROTO=TCP SPT=1147 DPT=23 WINDOW=16384 RES=0x00 SYN URGP=0 Jul 31 09:52:46 firewall kernel: Shorewall:all2all:REJECT:IN=eth2 OUT=eth0 SRC=192.168.10.26 DST=10.9.100.30 LEN=48 TOS=0x00

Hi, I have seen this come up in a couple of threads, but nothing recent. I was wondering a couple of things and was hoping someone could clarify. I have an existing working shorewall configuration (Details at end of post). >From within this config, I have a few ports redirected for use with portsentry (like the mini-howto directs forbidden port accesses to port 49999). This works

I''m having a problem with the Shorewall firewall and CUPS printing interfering with each other. My Linux firewall machine is acting as both a CUPS server and client for all of my tests. Shorewall 2.0.13 CUPS 1.1.22-2 Linux kernel 2.6.9 CUPS was working fine to print to my Epson C84 (network connected via a Netgear PS101 print server using lpd://PS101.IP.address/raw ) until I

Hallo, i have a problem to configure shorewall to enable scanning over the network with sane. The scanner is located at the firewall hosts local interface. Why do i get a "all2all" message and not "loc2loc" Aug 25 14:55:26 router saned[26946]: saned from sane-backends 1.0.11 ready Aug 25 14:55:26 router saned[26946]: check_host: access by remote host: 192.168.0.250 Aug

I have problem getting answer on http request from all my local subnets but not from local subnet. Ping and requests on ports 21 22 23 25 110 works fine. I logged port 80 in rules files and I got accept entry same for local subnet and other subnets. Local subnet is 192.168.6 Dec 29 09:52:40 zinfsrv2 kernel: Shorewall:loc2fw:ACCEPT:IN=eth0 OUT= MAC=00:09:6b:07:ca:cc:00:10:b5:fa:bd:71:08:00

Hi, I have a very simple server setup, using shorewall as my firewall. I have a line like this at the top of my rules file to allow ssh connections, but limited to 3 connection per minute with a burst rate of 3: SSH/ACCEPT net $FW - - - - 3/min:3 - Now when I have that in place, and from a remote machine run scp server:/some/file ., I find

I''ve had some issues with my network, and I''ve had to reconfigure my Gibraltar CD. It runs shorewall 1.4.8, and I have a 2-interface setup, so I downloaded the relevant files from the install page. Masq and such works, but I''m having a problem with my port forwarding. It works for port 22, but it doesn''t seem to work for any other port. I''ve turned

Hello shorewall-users, we have a strange problem where some of our customers cannot access our webshop, but most of the customers can. I have been slowly eliminating possibilities and am now left with either the firewall (Shorewall 1.4) or the webshop server. What appears a lot in the logfiles is: Jul 26 11:51:04 gw kernel: Shorewall:logdrop:DROP:IN=eth0 OUT=eth1 SRC=84.128.198.240

Hello All I installed shorewall 3.0.8 on Centos 4.3 with openvz.org kernel it work well i have in this Host 3 virtual servers (VPS) i can access from a VPS to the internet , and with NAt rule (Via Shorewall) i can access from Internet to the 3 VPS. i want that all the 3 VPS can communicate between them. i can''t do a tcp connection from a VPS to an other , in my shorewall log in the

I''ve got a linux router pushing 600-1000 pppoe connections through it. I''m getting a screen error "Neighbor Table Overflow" after this box has been up for between 1 week and 1 month. When this is happening, routing slows to a crawl if at all. Then dies. I''ve added: # Added to stop "neighbor table overflow" messages in the kernel

Lables: Gateway = 209.5.171.65 Netmask = 255.255.255.192 Eth0 = net = 209.5.171.66 Eth1 = loc = 192.168.0.1 There is no NAT clients, in essence loc is dmz. I can rename loc to dmz if that helps. Proxy/ARP is used for IP addresses 209.5.171.67-126 Problem: Using the Shorewall Action AllowFTP does not result in desired behavior when connecting from Internet to machines behind firewall in DMZ. From