similar to: CentOS 7 issues with pdf manual / tex conversion

Tom, On 30 May 2018 at 11:34, Tom Callaway wrote: | On 05/29/2018 04:53 PM, Dirk Eddelbuettel wrote: | > I noticed it with a local, not-public package -- but it appears to apply with | > any source package. I replicated with pkgKitten straight off CRAN and after | > checking that it has a six page manual there. | | I'm having trouble reproducing this one. In my fresh CentOS 7 VM, I

On 05/29/2018 04:53 PM, Dirk Eddelbuettel wrote: > I noticed it with a local, not-public package -- but it appears to apply with > any source package. I replicated with pkgKitten straight off CRAN and after > checking that it has a six page manual there. I'm having trouble reproducing this one. In my fresh CentOS 7 VM, I can pull the pkgKitten source down, and run R CMD Rd2pdf

Hi, The following command: R CMD Rd2pdf --no-preview --output=./tmp.pdf --title=test genefu-package.Rd run against this file: https://hedgehog.fhcrc.org/bioconductor/trunk/madman/Rpacks/genefu/man/genefu-package.Rd (username: readonly; password: readonly) produces a very verbose error (see below) with R version 2.15.0 alpha (2012-03-07 r58622). The .Rd file has these lines in it: Version: \tab

Hi all I am trying to build an R package, which I have successfully done many times before, but have an error I cannot trace. I hope someone can help me. Here's is some edited output (full output below if it is useful): pdunn2 at PDunnUbuntu:~/DSdata$ R CMD build GLMsData * checking for file 'GLMsData/DESCRIPTION' ... OK * preparing 'GLMsData': * checking DESCRIPTION

Hi, All: I encountered problems running "pdflatex wrapper.tex", as suggested on "www.r-project.org" -> Newsletter -> (near the bottom of the page). After 220 lines of seemingly successful processing, I got an error copied below. I hit <enter> a few times, and the "pdflatex" finished, apparently successfully. Comments? Thanks,

On 29 May 2018 at 16:37, R P Herrold wrote: | On Tue, 29 May 2018, Dirk Eddelbuettel wrote: | | > On a CentOS 7 machine, I am at a loss with respect to an inability to run a | > full R CMD check as anything involving tex files ends in tears. | | Hi, Dirk | | Have fun at the upcoming conference at UIC | | I seem to have 56 font packages installed under CentOS 7 | locally, but then I work

Hi, This is a follow-up to the problem reported here: https://stat.ethz.ch/pipermail/r-devel/2010-September/058460.html After I updated R-2.12 to 2010-09-13 r52905 on the Bioc build system, some of the packages that have a Makefile in <pkg>/inst/doc still don't build on Windows. For example, 'R\bin\R.exe CMD build adSplit' gives: * checking for file

>>>>> G?bor Cs?rdi <csardi.gabor at gmail.com> >>>>> on Thu, 8 Jan 2015 17:18:27 -0500 writes: > Dear all, > I am getting an R CMD check warning about the PDF manual. I am having a > hard time finding out what is wrong, here is the log of the Rd2pdf call. > The full check (and other) log is at >

Dear all, I am getting an R CMD check warning about the PDF manual. I am having a hard time finding out what is wrong, here is the log of the Rd2pdf call. The full check (and other) log is at https://api.travis-ci.org/jobs/46373922/log.txt?deansi=true if anybody is interested, and the package itself is here: https://github.com/metacran/r-builder/tree/bintex/rbuildertest Thanks, Best, Gabor

Hi, sorry for this lengthy post. I am using R-2.0.0 on Unix, compiled. Overview: A) R CMD check: Unaccounted top-level text B) In which sections of *.Rd is LaTeX notation allowed, where *not*? C) Codoc mismatches and polyvalent parameters D) Successful R CMD INSTALL and R CMD build E) cp ../Rd.sty . is copy necessary? F) latex ./CWHstat-manual.tex runs into trouble When running >R CMD

Hi, sorry for this lengthy post. I am using R-2.0.0 on Unix, compiled. Overview: A) R CMD check: Unaccounted top-level text B) In which sections of *.Rd is LaTeX notation allowed, where *not*? C) Codoc mismatches and polyvalent parameters D) Successful R CMD INSTALL and R CMD build E) cp ../Rd.sty . is copy necessary? F) latex ./CWHstat-manual.tex runs into trouble When running >R CMD

Dear R?ers I?m trying to get a summary table using latex and summary in the rms package to no avail. I?m running R 2.10.1, Mac OS X snow leopard and I have the mactex 2009 distribution installed. Any obvious things I?m missing? //M options(digits=3) set.seed(173) sex <- factor(sample(c("m","f"), 500, rep=TRUE)) age <- rnorm(500, 50, 5) treatment <-

Hi, Due to a change in Rd.sty a few days ago (https://github.com/wch/r-source/commit/620eb9a#diff-3bf3d821c6faae50cd6ec931f6f63296L272), the default installation of TeXLive 2009 or 2012 no longer works when building Rd to PDF. The error log is like this: =============== Converting Rd files to LaTeX ..... Creating pdf output from LaTeX ... Error in texi2dvi(file = file, pdf = TRUE, clean = clean,

Hello, can anyone explain the following error I get when trying to use the CHECK command to check a new version of my pakcage under 1.4.0? ****** ./R CMD check ~/GLMMGibbs.0.5.1/GLMMGibbs * checking for working latex ... OK * using log directory `/homef/jonm/R-1.4.0/bin/GLMMGibbs.Rcheck' ... <Installs library, documentation, and then performs various tests, including the example,

I am trying to build the latest version of R (3.6.2) on a CentOS system running 7.7.1908. I have been able to build previous versions of R up to and including 3.5.3 successfully. Starting with 3.6.0 the "make check" step fails with errors relating to "pdflatex" being missing. So, I installed texlive-latex (and the 100 other rpm dependencies) then tried rebuilding R.

In the process of updating R to R 2.7 alpha or R 2.7 beta for the BioConductor 2.2 builds on Windows, I have hit a snag because the BioC build system has long path names (e.g. D:\biocbld\bbs-2.2-bioc\R) and these path names are not resolving properly by MiKTeX 2.7 during vignette construction. Take, for example, the attached vignette from Biobase, Bioconductor.Rnw. I have built R from source

After configure, make and make check on a linux Suse 7.3 box, I run make dvi and make info with no problems but get a lot of garbage to my screen during make pdf. Is this normal? Is there a bug in this part of the installation? This is part of what I get on the screen: humboldt:/usr/local/R-patched # make pdf make[1]: Entering directory `/usr/local/R-patched/doc' make[2]: Entering

As some of you will be aware, TeXLive 2009 was released last month having blocked updates on earlier versions since May. This has lead to a flood of updates of LaTeX packages, as a result of which the PDF manuals of R 2.10.0 and earlier will no longer build, for two separate reasons. For MiKTeX users: at least version 2.8 (the current one) has the same updates (a week or so later) and has

Recently, I upgraded MiKTeX to the latest versions, and since then there are problems when I try to build R and/or R packages. I tried to build R 1.9.0 beta and R 1.8.1 patched I am running Windows XP Pro, SP 1 MikTeX version is This is e-TeX, Version 3.141592-2.1 (MiKTeX 2.4) (preloaded format=latex 2004.3.27) fpTeX version is This is e-TeXk, Version 3.141592-2.1 (Web2c 7.5.2) (format=latex

Dear R People: I'm building a packages on an Ubuntu Karmic Koala 9.10 system and am getting the following errors: * checking PDF version of manual ... WARNING LaTeX errors when creating PDF version. This typically indicates Rd problems. LaTeX errors found: ! Font T1/ptm/m/n/10=ptmr8t at 10.0pt not loadable: Metric (TFM) file not found . <to be read again> relax l.7