similar to: Fixed updates for EL5 / EL6

On Tue, Jun 7, 2016 at 11:46 AM, Tom Callaway <tcallawa at redhat.com> wrote: > On 06/06/2016 05:04 PM, Brian Fallik wrote: > > Apologies if this email is a top post. I'm not sure how to reply to a > > thread if I'm not subscribed. > > > > We recently encountered the same issue that Evan reported on 6/4 and I > can > > confirm that updated to

Over the last several days, I've been working hard to get all of the Fedora R packages rebuilt against R 4.0 in rawhide (in the F33-R-4 side tag). With the exception of R-biomaRt, R-BSgenome, R-GenomicAlignments, and R-rtracklayer, I believe everything is built and updated to the latest versions. And of those packages, they're all ready to go when Fedora infrastructure is working reliably

Apologies if this email is a top post. I'm not sure how to reply to a thread if I'm not subscribed. We recently encountered the same issue that Evan reported on 6/4 and I can confirm that updated to 3.3.0-5 does address the build failure. Will 3.3.0-5 make it into EPEL? If so, do you have any idea when? The current package is breaking our build process and I'm wondering if it's

R-BiocFileCache is now branched for f32 (finally). You should be able to build it if/when the PDC comes back up. Lotta random outages right now. Tom On Mon, Jul 6, 2020 at 10:40 AM Jos? Ab?lio Matos <jamatos at fc.up.pt> wrote: > On Tuesday, 9 June 2020 03.40.52 WEST Tom Callaway wrote: > > Over the last several days, I've been working hard to get all of the > Fedora >

R 2.12.0 is built now for Fedora and EPEL. It is in "updates-testing" (or it will be within the next 24 hours). I did not do this build for Fedora 12, as that release will be End-Of-Life in a month. In accordance with the new policies on Fedora Updates, these new packages will not be pushed as official updates until they either receive positive testing from users, or sit in

On 01/26/2016 04:43 PM, Tom Callaway wrote: > On 01/21/2016 10:38 AM, joe cypherpunk wrote: >> R help.start() opens a web browser as expected, but the ?Manual? html links >> are dead (although the ?Reference? and ?Miscellaneous Materials? html links >> do work). I get a similar problem from within RStudio. >> >> >> I?d like to get pointy-clicky html manuals

On Tue, 14 Jul 2020 at 01:19, Jos? Ab?lio Matos <jamatos at fc.up.pt> wrote: > > On Saturday, 11 July 2020 11.32.32 WEST Jos? Ab?lio Matos wrote: > > If I do not hear until then I will push the update Monday night (Western > > Europe time zone. > > Well I tried but I did not succeeded both using the web interface and cli > interfaces: > >

Hi all, I'm looking for a fix in postgis, which seems to be fixed already in postgis-2.0.7-2.el7. However that package seems to be 'stuck' in the epel7-testing repository: https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/buildinfo?buildID=750618 https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2016-b6c229157e Is there a reason that the package is not pushed to stable yet? Or can it be

Hi All, I have installed on a RHEL 5.7 server the recent R-3.3.0 rpm but I would like to upgrade to the latest now available R-3.3.1 . I have not found so far the rpm, I would like to know if and when it will be available? Thanks in advance, Cris This e-mail is confidential and may also contain privileged information. If you are not the intended recipient you are not authorised to read,

Hi Tom, I'm seeing another similar build failure with the recent 3.3.0-5 and I'm a bit stumped about what's going on. On a fresh VM, after installing 3.3.0-5 and then running: install.packages(c("lpSolveAPI), method="curl", repos=" https://cran.rstudio.com") the build fails with: gcc: /builddir/build/BUILD/R-3.3.0/zlib-1.2.8/target/usr/lib64/libz.a: No

On Tue, 7 Jul 2020 at 15:58, Jos? Ab?lio Matos <jamatos at fc.up.pt> wrote: > > On Tuesday, 7 July 2020 11.44.48 WEST I?aki Ucar wrote: > > Try with the CLI (see "man bodhi"): > > > > $ bodhi updates edit <update> --addbuilds <builds> > > I found that the best call in this case is instead of --addbuilds to use > --from-tag since then

On 6/11/19 12:45 AM, cosml at rsguhr.eu wrote: > Okay, some minutes before I post this question - the update was pushed to mirror.centos.org and an announcement was published: > https://lists.centos.org/pipermail/centos-announce/2019-June/023321.html > > But the actually question still remains: > Which steps are between 'RedHat published an update' and

On Tue, 9 Jun 2020 at 10:21, I?aki Ucar <iucar at fedoraproject.org> wrote: > > > Given the huge amount of builds (and rebuilds) in this process, I am > > strongly disinclined to attempt this work for Fedora 32 (the idea of > > hundreds of bodhi overrides does not fill me with joy), but I would not > > prevent someone else who wished to try to do so. > > Note

R 2.8.1 is packaged up and queued up for testing. Please test this out: Fedora 9: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/rpy-1.0.3-6.fc9,R-2.8.1-1.fc9 Fedora 10: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/rpy-1.0.3-6.fc10,R-2.8.1-1.fc10 Once you've tested it, please, please, go to the update URL above and click "Add A Comment". If it works for you, click "Works for me" and

*All boxes are EL6 x86_64, fully up to date* Updated to R 3.3.0-3 recently, however just yesterday I tried to update a couple packages for a user and noticed almost nothing would build. I was (am) getting the same build errors as another previously posted (https://stat.ethz.ch/pipermail/r-sig-fedora/2016-June/000452.html). I watched over the bodhi page for the issue and noticed 3.3.0-5 was

On Wed, Sep 21, 2016 at 7:39 PM, Tom Callaway <tcallawa at redhat.com> wrote: > > On 09/16/2016 10:28 AM, Jeroen Ooms wrote: > > Where are the R docs located on EL6? It seems neither R.home("doc") > > nor Sys.getenv("R_DOC_DIR") exists? > > /usr/share/doc/R-3.3.1 > Can we set this in R_DOC_DIR accordingly so that it can be programmatically

Maybe Elliott? On Tue, 23 Jun 2020 at 15:01, Tom Callaway <spotrh at gmail.com> wrote: > > At this point, I simply don't have the time. > > Tom > > On Tue, Jun 23, 2020, 6:06 AM I?aki Ucar <iucar at fedoraproject.org> wrote: >> >> On Tue, 9 Jun 2020 at 10:21, I?aki Ucar <iucar at fedoraproject.org> wrote: >> > >> > > Given

Hi, RedHat published an update for bind two weeks ago - it's fixed some bind vulnerabilities (https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2019:1294). There's a commit 'import bind-9.9.4-74.el7_6.1' on https://git.centos.org/rpms/bind/commits/c7 since 12 ago but http://mirror.centos.org/ still ships the old non-updated version of bind (bind-9.9.4-73.el7_6.x86_64.rpm) Couldn't find

R 2.12.1 is built now for Fedora and EPEL. It is in "updates-testing" (or it will be within the next 24 hours). In accordance with the new policies on Fedora Updates, these new packages will not be pushed as official updates until they either receive positive testing from users, or sit in updates-testing for two weeks. You can help us test these packages, and move them forward.

On Tue, 7 Jul 2020 at 12:38, Jos? Ab?lio Matos <jamatos at fc.up.pt> wrote: > > On Monday, 6 July 2020 21.08.53 WEST Tom Callaway wrote: > > R-BiocFileCache is now branched for f32 (finally). You should be able to > > build it if/when the PDC comes back up. Lotta random outages right now. > > > > Tom > > I have re/built them using the side tag but I do not