similar to: problems compiling packages | 3.3.0 | Linux

On Tue, Jun 7, 2016 at 11:46 AM, Tom Callaway <tcallawa at redhat.com> wrote: > On 06/06/2016 05:04 PM, Brian Fallik wrote: > > Apologies if this email is a top post. I'm not sure how to reply to a > > thread if I'm not subscribed. > > > > We recently encountered the same issue that Evan reported on 6/4 and I > can > > confirm that updated to

I know, I know, you've heard this song before... ;) EL5: https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2016-09c8007e64 EL6: https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2016-0a9e4df655 Please go download -8 and test it. It looks good on my end. If it works for you (with CRAN modules), please give positive karma so it will land in updates-stable faster than two weeks. Thanks

Hi Tom, I'm seeing another similar build failure with the recent 3.3.0-5 and I'm a bit stumped about what's going on. On a fresh VM, after installing 3.3.0-5 and then running: install.packages(c("lpSolveAPI), method="curl", repos=" https://cran.rstudio.com") the build fails with: gcc: /builddir/build/BUILD/R-3.3.0/zlib-1.2.8/target/usr/lib64/libz.a: No

Hi All, I have installed on a RHEL 5.7 server the recent R-3.3.0 rpm but I would like to upgrade to the latest now available R-3.3.1 . I have not found so far the rpm, I would like to know if and when it will be available? Thanks in advance, Cris This e-mail is confidential and may also contain privileged information. If you are not the intended recipient you are not authorised to read,

Over the last several days, I've been working hard to get all of the Fedora R packages rebuilt against R 4.0 in rawhide (in the F33-R-4 side tag). With the exception of R-biomaRt, R-BSgenome, R-GenomicAlignments, and R-rtracklayer, I believe everything is built and updated to the latest versions. And of those packages, they're all ready to go when Fedora infrastructure is working reliably

*All boxes are EL6 x86_64, fully up to date* Updated to R 3.3.0-3 recently, however just yesterday I tried to update a couple packages for a user and noticed almost nothing would build. I was (am) getting the same build errors as another previously posted (https://stat.ethz.ch/pipermail/r-sig-fedora/2016-June/000452.html). I watched over the bodhi page for the issue and noticed 3.3.0-5 was

On 01/26/2016 04:43 PM, Tom Callaway wrote: > On 01/21/2016 10:38 AM, joe cypherpunk wrote: >> R help.start() opens a web browser as expected, but the ?Manual? html links >> are dead (although the ?Reference? and ?Miscellaneous Materials? html links >> do work). I get a similar problem from within RStudio. >> >> >> I?d like to get pointy-clicky html manuals

Greetings. Sorry I am a bit new to this list. I am trying to compile R-3.3.0 and/or R-3.3.1 on computational cluster running Centos 6.6 I have custom installation of zlib 1.2.8 , but it's not in default /lib /usr/lib /usr/include location and configure script keeps failing when looking for it. It doesn't seem to care if correct zlib.h is in path and always seems to find one in /usr/include

Hi all, I'm looking for a fix in postgis, which seems to be fixed already in postgis-2.0.7-2.el7. However that package seems to be 'stuck' in the epel7-testing repository: https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/buildinfo?buildID=750618 https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2016-b6c229157e Is there a reason that the package is not pushed to stable yet? Or can it be

On Fri, Jul 21, 2017 at 11:39 AM, Tom Callaway <tcallawa at redhat.com> wrote: > On 07/21/2017 11:18 AM, Larry Martell wrote: >> I am trying to install R 3.4.0 on RHEL6. If I look here is it there: >> >> http://mirror.sjc02.svwh.net/fedora-epel/6/x86_64/ >> >> I did this: >> >> sudo subscription-manager repos --enable rhel-6-server-optional-rpms

On 02/03/2016 09:52 AM, Tom Callaway wrote: > Are you trying to build R and components for i686 rather than x86_64? Never mind. Your logs make it clear that you're building for x86_64. Can you share the output of: pkg-config --list-all |grep libcurl curl-config --libs rpm -V libcurl-devel libcurl I'm honestly baffled as to why the configure script is failing to find libcurl.pc on

R 2.12.0 is built now for Fedora and EPEL. It is in "updates-testing" (or it will be within the next 24 hours). I did not do this build for Fedora 12, as that release will be End-Of-Life in a month. In accordance with the new policies on Fedora Updates, these new packages will not be pushed as official updates until they either receive positive testing from users, or sit in

Hi folks, As expected of a new major release of R, there is a break in compatibility for R packages. From the NEWS entry for 4.0.0: Packages need to be (re-)installed under this version (4.0.0) of R. This has two impacts on Fedora/EPEL. 1. Users who update to 4.0.0 will need to rebuild any/all packages installed from CRAN. 2. Fedora/EPEL R packages will need to be rebuilt for 4.0.0. For

R-BiocFileCache is now branched for f32 (finally). You should be able to build it if/when the PDC comes back up. Lotta random outages right now. Tom On Mon, Jul 6, 2020 at 10:40 AM Jos? Ab?lio Matos <jamatos at fc.up.pt> wrote: > On Tuesday, 9 June 2020 03.40.52 WEST Tom Callaway wrote: > > Over the last several days, I've been working hard to get all of the > Fedora >

Updated my R install on my GNU/Linux boxes (running CentOS 6.8) from 3.2.x -> 3.3.0, using latest from epel (i.e., not compiling from source), and while said upgrade seemed to go fine, am now (post-upgrade) having all sorts of problems with getting some (but not all) packages to compile (either during an initial install attempt, or upgrade to existing packages). For example, if I try to

Okay, I'm convinced. https://github.com/rpm-software-management/R-rpm-macros/pull/1 Thanks, Tom On Mon, May 11, 2020 at 11:48 AM I?aki Ucar <iucar at fedoraproject.org> wrote: > On Mon, 11 May 2020 at 16:29, Tom Callaway <tcallawa at redhat.com> wrote: > > > > Hmmm. That seems like a rather heavy dependency, given that I think we've > > only been forced

On Tue, 14 Jul 2020 at 01:19, Jos? Ab?lio Matos <jamatos at fc.up.pt> wrote: > > On Saturday, 11 July 2020 11.32.32 WEST Jos? Ab?lio Matos wrote: > > If I do not hear until then I will push the update Monday night (Western > > Europe time zone. > > Well I tried but I did not succeeded both using the web interface and cli > interfaces: > >

I am trying to install R 3.4.0 on RHEL6. If I look here is it there: http://mirror.sjc02.svwh.net/fedora-epel/6/x86_64/ I did this: sudo subscription-manager repos --enable rhel-6-server-optional-rpms sudo subscription-manager repos --enable rhel-6-server-extras-rpms wget https://dl.fedoraproject.org/pub/epel/epel-release-latest-6.noarch.rpm rpm epel-release-latest-6.noarch.rpm Which all

Thinking out loud here... do we want to have some macro magic to embed a dependency on an R(ABI) provides? Where R 4.0.0 would provide R(ABI) = 4 and all R packages built against it would pick up Requires: R(ABI) = 4 ? I don't suppose we need it, since the likelihood of someone installing R module packages but not updating R is low, but I wanted to throw it out there. Tom On Mon, May 4, 2020

R help.start() opens a web browser as expected, but the ?Manual? html links are dead (although the ?Reference? and ?Miscellaneous Materials? html links do work). I get a similar problem from within RStudio. I?d like to get pointy-clicky html manuals working, to help migrate users from SAS to R. I do see R manuals on this system from the EPEL R rpm's in info and pdf form, for example at