similar to: listen backlog patch

Displaying 20 results from an estimated 1000 matches similar to: "listen backlog patch"

2015 Feb 19
2
listen backlog patch
Hi Thomas, I don't know if you like top or bottom quoting. That seems to be a big-little endian thing ;-) So, I will top quote and inline quote. Please see my comments inline, below. Kind regards, Stephan On 02/19/2015 04:18 PM, "Thomas B. R?cker" wrote: > Hi, > > On 02/19/2015 03:07 PM, Stephan Leemburg wrote: >> Hello Icecast-dev, >> >> I am new to
2009 Jul 13
2
SSL_PARAMETERS_PERM_PATH
Hi, I am not on this list so please CC me. Using dovecot-1.2.x it seems we can not configure the location of ssl- parameters.dat.tmp, it is hard coded to be in PKG_STATEDIR: ./src/master/master-settings.c: #define SSL_PARAMETERS_PERM_PATH PKG_STATEDIR"/"SSL_PARAMETERS_FILENAME This can lead to problems when you're running multiple instances on one machine. Apart from that, it
2015 Feb 20
0
listen backlog patch
Hi, On 02/19/2015 03:40 PM, Stephan Leemburg wrote: > I don't know if you like top or bottom quoting. That seems to be a > big-little endian thing ;-) > > So, I will top quote and inline quote. playing it safe, ha! > Please see my comments inline, below. > > Kind regards, > Stephan > > > On 02/19/2015 04:18 PM, "Thomas B. R?cker" wrote: >>
2011 May 03
1
listen = ipv4, ipv6
Hi, We want dovecot to listen on a specific ip4 & ipv6 addresses like so: listen = 145.58.1.1, [2a02:458:1::1] But on startup it tells me: Fatal: service(managesieve-login) Can't resolve address [2a02:458:1::1]: Name or service not known Wether it is in the dns or not. If I however change the listen directive to: listen = f.qd.nl where f.qd.nl resolves to an ip4 and ipv6 address
2015 Feb 19
0
listen backlog patch
Hi, On 02/19/2015 03:07 PM, Stephan Leemburg wrote: > Hello Icecast-dev, > > I am new to this list. Welcome! > I am working for the NPO, the Dutch Public Broadcasting agency. > We do a lot of icecast streaming. We run at least 20 icecast server > instances on our media streaming cluster. That's very nice to hear. > We ran into an issue that clients which where
2009 Aug 03
5
Released Sieve v0.1.10 for Dovecot v1.2.2
Hello Dovecot users, In the last week two nasty bugs were found in the new Sieve implementation. Primarily, the include extension did not work when a compiled binary was loaded from disk. This is something that is still not tested by the test suite, giving this bug the opportunity to slip through. Also, the value matching implementation would sometimes cause a assertion failure. Other than
2009 Aug 03
5
Released Sieve v0.1.10 for Dovecot v1.2.2
Hello Dovecot users, In the last week two nasty bugs were found in the new Sieve implementation. Primarily, the include extension did not work when a compiled binary was loaded from disk. This is something that is still not tested by the test suite, giving this bug the opportunity to slip through. Also, the value matching implementation would sometimes cause a assertion failure. Other than
2010 Nov 09
1
Can't expand ~ for mail root dir
Hi, I am not an this list, I hope it gets through: We just moved from dovecot-1.2.12 to dovecot-2.0.6. One of our users wants his mail directly in his homedir which worked fine so far but with 2.0.6: Nov 09 15:19:25 imap(foo.bar at example.com): Error: user foo.bar at example.com: Initialization failed: Initializing mail storage from mail_location setting failed: No home directory for system
2013 Oct 10
3
[PATCH net-next v3 5/5] xen-netback: enable IPv6 TCP GSO to the guest
This patch adds code to handle SKB_GSO_TCPV6 skbs and construct appropriate extra or prefix segments to pass the large packet to the frontend. New xenstore flags, feature-gso-tcpv6 and feature-gso-tcpv6-prefix, are sampled to determine if the frontend is capable of handling such packets. Signed-off-by: Paul Durrant <paul.durrant@citrix.com> Cc: Wei Liu <wei.liu2@citrix.com> Cc: David
2012 Feb 21
2
duplicates with multiple To/CC and sieve redirect copy
Hi, In one installation we are using sieve "redirect :copy" to create copy of the incoming email (local boss gets copy of its employees mails). There is a problem when the incoming email has multiple To/CC entries with local users. Multiple copy/redirects are created (one for each employee) and there are multiple copies in "boss" account. Each of this emails has the same
2012 Jan 17
5
Dedicated Firewall/Router
Hi All, I want to build a dedicated firewall/router as I am launching a NPO and I can host this in my garage. (Comcast offered me a 100 x 20 circuit for $99/mo with 5 statics) I used to run Untangle, but as of version 9, you are forced to use their build in protocol policies versus the firewalling I am used to (Deny All and then opening holes for specific IP's, etc). There are so many
2017 Oct 24
2
FreeBSD Member server error WBC_ERR_DOMAIN_NOT_FOUND
Hi! I have 1 samba AD DC running 4.6.6 on FreeBSD 11.1 and member server running 4.6.8. on FreeBSD 11.1 I have domain PISK. (dc=pisk,dc=npo) On member server i build the port by hand and select the EXP_MODULES configuration option. i see following error # wbinfo -i PISK\\Administrator failed to call wbcGetpwnam: WBC_ERR_DOMAIN_NOT_FOUND Could not get info for user PISK\Administrator I read
2013 Jan 04
2
(no subject)
Hi, I am using the nls function and it stops because the number of iterations exceeded 50, but i used the nls.control argument to allow for 500 iterations. Do you have any idea why it's not working? fm1 <- nls(npe ~ SSgompertz(npo, Asym, b2, b3), data=f,control=nls.control(maxiter=500)) Error in nls(y ~ exp(-b2 * b3^x), data = xy, algorithm = "plinear", start = c(b2 =
2003 Nov 21
2
question on scalability
Hello All, We have a Linux cluster application that uses openssh as its inter-node communication mechanism and we've recently run into a problem that points to a potential scalability issue in openssh code. Our client nodes systematically open ssh connections to the server node to execute an administrative command. When establishing socket connections, the server side sometimes fails to
2013 Jul 02
3
[PATCH RFC] xen-netback: remove guest RX path dependence on MAX_SKB_FRAGS
This dependence is undesirable and logically incorrect. It''s undesirable because Xen network protocol should not depend on a OS-specific constant. It''s incorrect because the ring slots required doesn''t correspond to the number of frags a SKB has (consider compound page frags). This patch removes this dependence by correctly counting the ring slots required.
2013 Jan 03
1
nls problem with iterations
Hi, I am using the nls function and it stops because the number of iterations exceeded 50, but i used the nls.control argument to allow for 500 iterations. Do you have any idea why it's not working? fm1 <- nls(npe ~ SSgompertz(npo, Asym, b2, b3), data=f,control=nls.control(maxiter=500)) Thanks for your help, Cheers, Karine.
2015 May 01
5
sftp chroot requirements
I did not find any clues when 'googling' and could not find any search options on the archives. So, your answer does really not help. If you can help me with some reference, then it is highly appreciated. I would like to understand the rationaly. Not why 'it is just like it is'. No, why. What is the reasoning behind it. I speak Dutch, English, some Japanese and C. So, I can
2013 Jan 30
2
About kern.ipc.somaxconn and netstat
Hello. We have a webserver using FreeBSD, we read about tunning kern.ipc.somaxconn (http://www.freebsd.org/doc/en_US.ISO8859-1/books/handbook/configtuning-kernel-limits.html) so the OS can handle all the connections. Is there a way to know how many connections are established in a certain moment?. I know about netstat(1) but is there any other command that we can use to know the exact amount of
2013 Jul 09
20
[PATCH 1/1] xen/netback: correctly calculate required slots of skb.
When counting required slots for skb, netback directly uses DIV_ROUND_UP to get slots required by header data. This is wrong when offset in the page of header data is not zero, and is also inconsistent with following calculation for required slot in netbk_gop_skb. In netbk_gop_skb, required slots are calculated based on offset and len in page of header data. It is possible that required slots
2015 May 01
2
sftp chroot requirements
Hello, Is there any security reason why the last component of a chroot path is required to be owned by root and not by the user that is chroot-ed into that path? I have tried to think of a reason, but cannot find any except for when several accounts are chrooted into the same directory. But if that is not the case, then, is there any security consideration? If not, then it seems to me that