similar to: Proposed openSSL usage improvements

Displaying 20 results from an estimated 1000 matches similar to: "Proposed openSSL usage improvements"

2014 Nov 13
2
Icecast stats.xml
Hi Geoff, On 11/13/2014 07:59 AM, Geoff Shang wrote: > On Thu, 13 Nov 2014, Roger H?gensen wrote: > >> Shoutcast v1, Shoutcast v2, Icecast-KH are all "compatible" with the >> way info is collected by StreamLicensing. > > It's not really clear to me what you're looking for in terms of > specific stats. There's an earlier thread, this message
2014 Nov 09
1
Proposed openSSL usage improvements
On 2014-11-09 12:37, "Thomas B. R?cker" wrote: > On 11/02/2014 05:56 PM, "Thomas B. R?cker" wrote: >> - hard disable compression I assume this is only header compression (where the vulnerability was) and not content compression? -- Roger "Rescator" H?gensen. Freelancer - http://www.EmSai.net/
2014 Nov 09
0
Proposed openSSL usage improvements
On 11/02/2014 05:56 PM, "Thomas B. R?cker" wrote: > Hi everyone, > > Prompted by the fact that addressing some of the recent SSL problems > actually would benefit from also changing things on how openSSL is used > (not just updating the library), I started looking into some improvements. > > The tracking ticket is: > https://trac.xiph.org/ticket/2070 > > To
2015 Apr 20
1
upcoming libshout beta/snapshot
On 04/20/2015 05:47 AM, Ralph Giles wrote: > On 19/04/15 08:15 PM, "Thomas B. R?cker" wrote: > >> If anyone happens to know about proven secure settings, just like the >> Mozilla labs settings for server side, please let us know. > You mean like https://wiki.mozilla.org/Security/Server_Side_TLS ? Yes, that's what we used for the Icecast server default cipher
2015 Apr 19
4
upcoming libshout beta/snapshot
Hi, as some of you might know Philipp has been working hard on adding TLS support to libshout, and a few other things. Originally we were planning to publish a beta or snapshot today, but we didn't manage to agree on a openssl client side cipher list yet. If anyone happens to know about proven secure settings, just like the Mozilla labs settings for server side, please let us know. We want
2017 Jan 17
3
Correct settings for ssl protocols" and "ssl ciphers"
I have the following two settings in my "10-ssl.conf" file # SSL protocols to use ssl_protocols = !SSLv2 # SSL ciphers to use ssl_cipher_list = ALL:!LOW:!SSLv2:!EXP:!aNULL I have seen different configurations while Googling. I am wondering what the consensus is for the best settings for these two items. What do the developers recommend? Thanks! -- Jerry
2014 Oct 23
3
Icecast stats.xml
Consider this a Ticket for Icecast 2.4 ******************************************************************************** If you look at {{{ admin/stats.xml }}} on a Icecast-KH server (default setup) and an Icecast 2.4 server (default setup) the following is one of the things that the KH branch has as extra info. {{{ <listener id="3581"> <ID>3581</ID>
2014 Nov 14
0
Icecast stats.xml
On 2014-11-13 09:16, "Thomas B. R?cker" wrote: > Hi Geoff, > > On 11/13/2014 07:59 AM, Geoff Shang wrote: >> On Thu, 13 Nov 2014, Roger H?gensen wrote: >> >>> Shoutcast v1, Shoutcast v2, Icecast-KH are all "compatible" with the >>> way info is collected by StreamLicensing. >> It's not really clear to me what you're looking
2015 Apr 26
3
question about use MP3s with LAME on Icecast
Hi. Is it possible (legally) to stream MP3s on Icecast that have been encoded with LAME encoder (http://lame.sourceforge.net/license.txt)? So if a composer writes a track, then saves in MP3 with LAME, and wants to distribute with Icecast server, is it legal? Must he get license for MP3 (http://mp3licensing.com/royalty/emd.html) and pay any royalties for MP3 DISTRIBUTING or STREAMING as it stated
1997 Jan 16
1
Re: BoS: hmm..seen this one?
> Intel: > rpm -Uvh ftp://ftp.redhat.com/updates/4.0/i386/util-linux-2.5-29.i386.rpm > > Alpha: > rpm -Uvh ftp://ftp.redhat.com/updates/4.0/axp/util-linux-2.5-29.axp.rpm > > SPARC: > rpm -Uvh ftp://ftp.redhat.com/updates/4.0/sparc/util-linux-2.5-29.sparc.rpm > > All of these packages have been signed with Red Hat''s PGP key. But when you do this,
2017 Apr 26
3
Apache + SSL: default configuration rated "C" by Qualys Labs
On 26 April 2017 at 13:16, Steven Tardy <sjt5atra at gmail.com> wrote: > >> On Apr 26, 2017, at 2:58 AM, Nicolas Kovacs <info at microlinux.fr> wrote: >> >> The site is rated "C" > > The RHEL/CentOS out-of-the-box apache tls is a little old but operational. This Mozilla resource is excellent for getting apache tls config up-to-date. > >
2015 Apr 27
2
upcoming libshout beta/snapshot
On 2015-04-26 18:15, Philipp Schafft wrote: > I tested with both Mozilla's 'Modern' and 'Intermediate' list. Both > work well with all versions of Icecast (official) as well as current -kh. > In that case my suggestion is for libshout to only focus on using the Modern list then as it explicitly excludes DES and RC4 and MD5. While HMAC-MD5 (for some password uses)
2017 Apr 26
4
Apache + SSL: default configuration rated "C" by Qualys Labs
Hi, I'm currently experimenting with a public server running CentOS 7. I have half a dozen production servers all running Slackware Linux, and I intend to progressively migrate them to CentOS, for a host of reasons (support cycle, package availability, SELinux, etc.) But before doing that, I have to figure out a few things that work differently under CentOS. Apache and SSL behave quite
2015 Jan 26
3
Apache and SSLv3
Hi list, I'm configuring apache with https and I've a question about sslv3 deactivation. Running "openssl ciphers -v" I get a list of cypher suite of openssl like: ECDH-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 TLSv1.2 Kx=ECDH/RSA Au=ECDH Enc=AESGCM(128) Mac=AEAD ......... Each lines report relative protocol. Disabling sslv3 with "SSLProtocol all -SSLv3" I can use cypher like:
2014 Nov 13
2
Icecast stats.xml
(see forwarded mail further below) Shoutcast v1, Shoutcast v2, Icecast-KH are all "compatible" with the way info is collected by StreamLicensing. Some may wonder why bothering to humor StreamLicensig, but the thing is that other licensing/royalty collectors did it the same way. StreamLicensing are now sadly the only ones that cater to small independent station that do not wish to be
2015 Feb 23
3
upgrading icecast to 2.4.1
Il 23/02/2015 17:06, "Thomas B. R?cker" ha scritto: > OK, that's from the Icecast side an easy situation. really thank you very much! I will make this operation tomorrow, but it seems easy. Still thanks.
2014 Dec 18
2
Icecast Over ssl
Hi Thomas, El 18/12/2014 22:25, Thomas B. R?cker <thomas at ruecker.fi> escribi?: > > On 12/18/2014 08:54 PM, Xabier Oneca -- xOneca wrote: >> >> Hello, Thomas, >> >> El 18/12/2014 21:35, Thomas B. R?cker <thomas at ruecker.fi> escribi?: >> > >> > On 12/18/2014 08:29 PM, Xabier Oneca -- xOneca wrote: >> > > >> > >
2013 Oct 08
2
icecast-2.3.99.3
Yes. I'm running The 2.3.99.3 win32 version. And if you can to provide the " mime.types " and " crossdomain.xml " files by yourself it will be great. TNX! -----Original Message----- From: "Thomas B. R?cker" [mailto:thomas at ruecker.fi] Sent: Tuesday, October 08, 2013 5:58 PM To: icecast-dev at xiph.org Cc: Yaniv Sharon Subject: Re: [Icecast-dev]
2015 Feb 25
2
upgrading icecast to 2.4.1
Done that and all works... Thanks. and I could still use my old config file with all of my settings in it? Because that is what I'm still using now. On 2/25/2015 12:22 PM, "Thomas B. R?cker" wrote: > On 02/25/2015 07:17 PM, Jonathan wrote: >> I will send you the errors first and then the modified script. >> >> Adding official Icecast repository for Ubuntu
2012 Jul 08
2
Icecast 2.3.3 + Debian
On Sun, Jul 08, 2012 at 12:15:52AM +0300, R?cker Thomas wrote: > On 07/07/12 23:54, ohio?fm wrote: > > Hello! When will the 2.3.3 update get kicked over to apt-get? Also, > That's up to the debian maintainers of icecast not us. > Please ask them. I have done so myself (see debian bug 652663), > but not received an update for a while. Use the source: deb