similar to: Bug in handling fallback-override clients + patch

Displaying 20 results from an estimated 90 matches similar to: "Bug in handling fallback-override clients + patch"

2009 Nov 19
3
ZFS send / recv to a lower ZFS version
Hi, We are using multiple opensolaris 06/09 and solaris 10 servers. Currently we are ''dumping'' (incremental)backups to a backup server. I wonder if anybody knows what happens when I send/recv a zfs volume from version 15 to a (backup) system with version 14. I''ve the feeling it''s not very wise to do, but is it doable and what kind of caveats can be
2015 May 05
0
Current Listeners count wrong for HTML Audio on Android?
Hello I always have had best results encoding the stream .mp3 it works on all devices. I also suggest the source to be the same or better than your stream.. this saves in many areas. it sounds like you are possibly debugging a time lapsed source/ stream.. i did not read all so if this is not so i apologize On May 5, 2015 3:11 AM, "Klaas van der Linden" < vanderlinden at
2015 May 05
3
Current Listeners count wrong for HTML Audio on Android?
Thanks for this information, but the two connections do not die out when using my player in the Android browser. In fact they even stay when the Audio.src is set to some invalid string. You can observe this here: http://concertzender.nl/wp-content/themes/cz-theme/App/test/ , by clicking one of the large icons - and then monitor the corresponding stream here: http://streams.greenhost.nl:8080/
2015 May 02
2
Current Listeners count wrong for HTML Audio on Android?
Dear all, The problem I am facing, is that one of my clients is concerned about data usage. My client monitors the current number of listeners in the Mount Point list streams.greenhost.nl:8080. The case is, when I start a stream from an HTML app on an Android device, I can see two listeners being added to "Current Listeners". This peculiar behaviour only occurs on Android, not on
2003 May 08
0
Ring detection of X100P really bad
Hello all, I'm new to the asterisk world, so maybe it's a simple setting, maybe not. We use a X100P (single FXO card) and a TDM400P with 1 port (the Developers kit with PCI cards). They are both in different servers and bridge over internet via IAX. The X100P is connected to a small PBX which is connected on a Euro ISDN line. They idea is that we use asterisk to include 1 remote
2005 Jul 05
0
(no subject)
> Hi Joshua, > I think that if the client workstation has not joined a domain, then it > will > simply ask for a valid username/password combination for that share in > order > to try and access it's content. > The machines have a valid machine account, and i have thought of this possibility too and re-joined them in the domain. When accessing a share for which he is
2015 May 03
0
Current Listeners count wrong for HTML Audio on Android?
Klaas, You will find that there often are multiple connections, particularly for HTML5 audio elements in WebKit browsers as they probe to see if the media is seekable or not. The multiple connections die out soon after starting though, leaving you one connection for actually streaming the audio. You can verify this yourself with a packet sniffer such as Wireshark. It wouldn't hurt to double
2018 Feb 07
2
Ip based peer probe volume create error
On 8/02/2018 4:45 AM, Gaurav Yadav wrote: > After seeing command history, I could see that you have 3 nodes, and > firstly you are peer probing 51.15.90.60? and 163.172.151.120 from? > 51.15.77.14 > So here itself you have 3 node cluster, after all this you are going > on node 2 and again peer probing 51.15.77.14. > ?Ideally it should work, with above steps, but due to some
2005 Jul 05
1
samba share problem accessing from w2k client
Hi, I got a problem with accessing some share's on my samba PDC (3.0.14) When a user tyr to access a share for which he is not authorised a box show up to suplly a name and password to access the share. Why doesnt the user get a box with 'access denied'? When u supply a username (DOMAINNAME\USERNAME) and password which is authorised for the share u get the message:
2013 Jun 14
1
Executing Stored Procedure using ODBC MSSQL
Hello, I'm trying to execute a stored procedure on a MSSQL Server from the dial plan, but it's not working. I'm getting the following error: Unable to execute query.... Asterisk has been compiled with UnixODBC, and I've done the necessary configurations in func_odbc, res_odbc and odbc.ini. Has anyone done this before with success? -------------- next part -------------- An HTML
2013 Jun 14
1
[LLVMdev] Raising inline-asm blocks
Hello, According to the notes in [1] there was a plan to raise inline assembly blocks to the level of LLVM intrinsics or 'actual' LLVM IR. Is anyone aware of progress in this area? I'm aware that a complete solution in general is unlikely but a partial solution (that handles a subset of instructions directly mappable to the LLVM IR AST) could be very relevant. [1]
2013 Jun 14
0
[LLVMdev] Building pass out of source with cmake: undefined symbol error
After building the pass out of source with cmake, when I load it with opt, I get an undefined symbol error: _ZTIN4llvm12FunctionPassE undefined in the .so. (_ZTVN4llvm12FunctionPassE is also undefined -- a "U" when I run nm. This symbol -is- in all of the llvm libraries.) Platform: ubuntu 12.10 LTS, x86 64 gcc (Ubuntu/Linaro 4.6.3-1ubuntu5) 4.6.3 Build: LLVM 3.2 (svn), tried debug and
2013 Jun 14
0
[LLVMdev] Enabling the vectorizer for -Os -- ping
On 14 June 2013 05:37, Nadav Rotem <nrotem at apple.com> wrote: > Last week I wrote llvm-dev and presented data that shows how enabling the > vectorizer on -Os can improve the performance of many workloads and that it > has negligible effects on code size. I also added a command line switch to > make it easier for people to benchmark the vectorizer using -Os directly > from
2013 Jun 14
1
[LLVMdev] Enabling the vectorizer for -Os -- ping
Hi Nadav, No noticeable difference between "-Os" and "-Os -fvectorize" in code size or compilation times in my tests, and only minimal performance improvements (small enough to be ignored). cheers, --renato On 14 June 2013 09:29, Renato Golin <renato.golin at linaro.org> wrote: > On 14 June 2013 05:37, Nadav Rotem <nrotem at apple.com> wrote: > >>
2013 Jun 14
1
[LLVMdev] Error While Running Scan-Build
I seem to be hitting an error while initializing the scan-build.exe in Windows. C:\Users\lockhaja\llvm\tools\clang\tools\scan-build>perl -S scan-build The getpwuid function is unimplemented at scan-build line 35. Does anyone know what would be causing this error? The perl -S scan-build command appears and runs after I run scan-build from the command prompt. Regards, Jon Lockhart PhD
2013 Jun 14
0
[LLVMdev] Pass Schedule Error
On Jun 14, 2013, at 1:12 PM, dag at cray.com wrote: > I've been puzzling over this for a day: > > Unable to schedule 'Unnamed pass: implement Pass::getPassName()' > required by '<some pass>' > Unable to schedule pass > UNREACHABLE executed at llvm/lib/VMCore/PassManager.cpp:1213! > > First, why can't getPassName find the name? I have
2013 Jun 14
0
Homer SipCapture
Is anyone using Homer from sipcapture.org or anything like it for capture sip traffic for debuging? If so what are your experiences. Thanks -Bryan Anderson -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: <http://lists.digium.com/pipermail/asterisk-users/attachments/20130614/e0d7f149/attachment.htm>
2013 Jun 15
0
running at 44.1K but with standard frame sizes
Thanks for the answers Benjamin? On Jun 14, 2013, at 8:05 PMEDT, Benjamin Schwartz wrote: > I have flexibility in the frame sizes of the unencoded audio, and packet sizes on the RF link. > > This implies that you don't have a very tight latency constraint, so you can afford to run a resampler. > I assume the resample costs CPU cycles? the RX is battery powered, I'd just as
2013 Jun 14
2
[LLVMdev] Cambridge LLVM Social next week
Hi folks, Next Wednesday, 19th June, we'll be on Fort St. George, at 7:30pm http://gkpubs.co.uk/pubs-in-cambridge/fort-st-george-pub/ Weather permitting, there's a very nice beer garden and a good selection of beers. During this lame summer, we'll probably be repeating the same pub in hope the shy sun will come out, so the next one, on the 17th of July (it's in the calendar),
2013 Jun 14
0
[LLVMdev] Enabling the vectorizer for -Os -- ping
Sorry for the delays here. I am running our benchmark suite and will have data in a day or so. On Jun 13, 2013 9:40 PM, "Nadav Rotem" <nrotem at apple.com> wrote: > Hi, > > Last week I wrote llvm-dev and presented data that shows how enabling the > vectorizer on -Os can improve the performance of many workloads and that it > has negligible effects on code size. I