similar to: Patch - MP3 Frame validation

Displaying 20 results from an estimated 5000 matches similar to: "Patch - MP3 Frame validation"

2011 Oct 26
0
Patch - MP3 Frame validation
Hi Paul, Interesting patch! I'm recording mp3 streams from an Icecast server (using curl). This means files will start with partial frames. Most media-players don't have a problem with this, but some do, which results in incorrect bitrate detection for example. If I am right, this patch would solve that problem, causing the recorded file to start on a frame boundary because on
2004 Sep 07
1
Antw: Re: fallback to static mp3 file?
Hi Geoff, Thanks, that sounds like a good idea. I've just tried it and of course it works. Then I discovered that when the original source is not connected icecast doesn't fall through to the fallback mount. Is this a known problem? KJ > > Van: Geoff Shang <gshang@pacific.net.au> > Aan: Klaas Jan Wierenga <k.j.wierenga@home.nl> > CC: icecast@xiph.org > Datum:
2004 Nov 15
2
FW: Multi-Level Fallbacks
Do you mean you can relay within a single icecast server instance? So the relay is running on the same icecast process from which it is relaying a stream? KJ -----Oorspronkelijk bericht----- Van: Karl Heyes [mailto:karl@xiph.org] Verzonden: maandag 15 november 2004 22:18 Aan: Klaas Jan Wierenga CC: icecast Onderwerp: Re: FW: [Icecast] Multi-Level Fallbacks On Mon, 2004-11-15 at 20:36, Klaas
2006 Sep 08
3
URL authentication
In my case that's not needed, but yes it would be really nice if all mount options could be retrieved from the database using an authenticated URL. KJ Stefan de Konink wrote: > On Fri, 8 Sep 2006, Klaas Jan Wierenga wrote: > > >> I guess if the <authentication type="url> section could be used as a >> top-level tag (instead of as a sub-tag of
2004 Nov 15
2
FW: Multi-Level Fallbacks
Hi, I have used the SVN icecast-2.1-trunk version in my production system at http://audioserver.nl for 2 months now without problems. The fallbacks work fine as long as you make sure that the format (sampling frequency and bitrate) of the mount and it's fallback match. I have also patched the icecast-2.1-trunk version (patch not published yet, needs work to extract) to enable fallback of
2004 Sep 07
2
fallback to static mp3 file?
Karl, It would certainly be a useful feature for me and I guess others. The current solution with ezstream works but listeners all end up at the same (current) point in the mp3 file. With the mp3 file as a fallback each individual listener would want to start hearing it from the start. This might be more difficult to implement with the single-q that is in the current trunk code, I don't know.
2005 Jun 22
3
running icecast and a webserver on same port
Hi, You can if your machine is assigned two IP addresses. Then you can bind the webserver to port 80 on the first IP-adres and bind icecast to port 80 on the second IP-address. Hope this is helpful. Regards, KJ -----Oorspronkelijk bericht----- Van: icecast-bounces@xiph.org [mailto:icecast-bounces@xiph.org]Namens Laust Brock-Nannestad Verzonden: woensdag 22 juni 2005 2:27 Aan: icecast@xiph.org
2005 Jul 28
2
icecast performance on many concurrentlow-bitrate streams
Hi Karl, Thanks for your info. I have a standard Icecast-2.2 release with a few local patches. I'm a little apprehesive to apply my patches to the kh14 branch, so I'd rather patch my branch with the changes related to batched reads from the kh branch. I've looked at your code to see if I could spot the changes related to batching reads. So far I have not been able to find where
2004 Sep 15
3
FW: Tip: using icecast in chroot mode may break timestamp inaccess.log
Please post to the mailing list the next time Ralf. I'm not using yp directory listings, but I can guess why it is not working. You're probably missing the libcurl.so library in your chroot jail directories. Here's the listing of files I have in the chroot jail: -----%< cut here > ls -R .: admin etc lib opt usr var web ./admin: listclients.xsl listmounts.xsl
2005 Mar 07
2
high CPU load for large # sources?
Hi all, I have an icecast setup with 20+ sources. During peak times some 20 sources will be connected with a total of some 250 listeners more-or-less equally divided over the 20 sources. All streams are running at a measly 16 kbps. There is enough bandwidth to/from the server. During these peak times I see very high CPU usage for icecast 98-99%. The system I'm running is an Intel Celeron
2005 Jul 28
2
icecast performance on manyconcurrentlow-bitrate streams
Karl, I've managed to patch up my branch of Icecast to do the batching. Checked everything with valgrind and tested it extensively. It looks good. Tcpdump now shows nice size frames (mostly 1400 bytes). Any reason why you're not settings the MTU to something closer to 1500? Many thanks for your help, KJ -----Oorspronkelijk bericht----- Van: Karl Heyes [mailto:karl@xiph.org] Verzonden:
2005 Jun 26
1
running icecast and a webserver on same port
I'm curious about why you would want to run Icecast on port 80. Geoff Justin Bot wrote: >Care to shed some light on this? I have about 10 IPs that are at my >disposal and 3 I've been keeping for spares and whatnot. Though >binding them is a little beyond me. > >TIA > >Justin > >On 6/22/05, Klaas Jan Wierenga <k.j.wierenga@home.nl> wrote: > >
2006 Sep 08
2
URL authentication
Hi all, The URL authentication is great for reducing the administration overhead in running one or more icecast instances for lost of mountpoints and lots of listeners. However because the URL authentication is <mount> specific you still need to create a mountpoint for each (in our case) customer. Would it be possible to have a global URL authentication section which would apply to
2005 Feb 09
2
relation between burst- and queue-size with low bitrate streams
Hi all, I have a question about the relationship between the "queue-size" and the "burst-size" <limits> parameters. Q: When a client connects is the burst-size immediately added to the queue-size? If this is the case then the slack for a 16kpbs client goes down from 50 sec (102400[queue-size] / 16kbps = 50 sec) to 18 seconds ( (102400 - 65536[burst-size]) / 16kpbs =
2009 Oct 18
1
icecast-2.3.2-kh17 versus icecast-2.3.2
Hi, I've been using icecast-2.3.1 for some time now and it is really working well for me, solid as a rock (no crashes) and running 100's of streams and 1000's of listeners, but in order to support authentication and have easier configuration I want to start using the url authentication (esp. the stream_auth) and mount-name wildcards that are supported by icecast-2.3.2-kh17.
2005 Feb 15
1
icecast stats
I have a patch on icecast-2.2.0 svn version which was written specifically to support SimpleCast users to retrieve the stats for their mountpoint and only that mountpoint. This is based on per mount-point username password. Using HTTP authentication the client can retrieve only http://hostname/admin/stats.xml given the correct username/password. This will only return the stats for that
2005 Jul 27
1
icecast performance on many concurrent low-bitrate streams
Hi all, I'm running an Icecast-2.2 server with at peak times some 50 sources and 500 concurrent listeners all using low-bitrate 16kpbs streams. I'm experiencing some connection losses at these peak times ("Client connection died" message in error.log). The machine running Icecast has a 100Mbit connection to the internet. It is a Celeron 2.4Ghz machine with 1Gbyte of main
2005 Dec 28
2
Use of TCP_CORK instead of TCP_NODELAY
Klaas Jan Wierenga wrote: > Hi Henri and others, > > Very interesting post about TCP_CORK. I would be very interested in having > it applied in the next version of Icecast. I'd be more interested in some figures to show there being a benefit, most examples talk about HTTP servers with short lived connections where sendfile(2) is used. > For low-bitrate streams the problem
2010 Nov 23
3
analytics
Hello all, We (at ibiblio.org) are evaluating several projects and products for getting good analytics from icecast. Specifically, we have explored cacti and awstats. I am writing because I would like users of this list to send me their experiences with analytics and monitoring packages and products. I would like details such as time for initial deployment, time and steps to add an addiitonal
2005 Nov 26
1
Server question - if you had ...
Hi all, Ok, how about this one. If you had $300 to spend on bandwidth, where would you buy it? I'm looking for a good dedicated bandwidth deal. Cheers, KJ Dale Ghent wrote: > On Nov 21, 2005, at 11:03 AM, Steven Clift wrote: > >> >> If you had $3,000 for a new Icecast2 streaming server, what would you >> buy? >> >> What box, hard drives, LAN cards,