similar to: Prinde banii: 500 RON

Reinventeaza-te! Ai fost invitat de CHELARIU CRISTIAN-IULIAN la jocul Regleaza Linkutil ca pagina de Start de pe www.linkutil.ro cu castiguri de 500 RON saptamanal! Acest email este trimis tie pentru ca prietenul tau/prietena ta CHELARIU CRISTIAN-IULIAN se afla in concurs si are nevoie de sprijinul tau, deoarece sansele se maresc daca se fac mai multe inregistrari pentru invitatii. Martea

Reinventeaza-te! Ai fost invitat de CHELARIU CRISTIAN-IULIAN la jocul Regleaza Linkutil ca pagina de Start de pe www.linkutil.ro cu castiguri de 500 RON saptamanal! Acest email este trimis tie pentru ca prietenul tau/prietena ta CHELARIU CRISTIAN-IULIAN se afla in concurs si are nevoie de sprijinul tau, deoarece sansele se maresc daca se fac mai multe inregistrari pentru invitatii. Martea

Reinventeaza-te! Ai fost invitat de CHELARIU CRISTIAN-IULIAN la jocul Regleaza Linkutil ca pagina de Start de pe www.linkutil.ro cu castiguri de 500 RON saptamanal! Acest email este trimis tie pentru ca prietenul tau/prietena ta CHELARIU CRISTIAN-IULIAN se afla in concurs si are nevoie de sprijinul tau, deoarece sansele se maresc daca se fac mai multe inregistrari pentru invitatii. Martea

Reinventeaza-te! Ai fost invitat de CHELARIU CRISTIAN-IULIAN la jocul Regleaza Linkutil ca pagina de Start de pe www.linkutil.ro cu castiguri de 500 RON saptamanal! Acest email este trimis tie pentru ca prietenul tau/prietena ta CHELARIU CRISTIAN-IULIAN se afla in concurs si are nevoie de sprijinul tau, deoarece sansele se maresc daca se fac mai multe inregistrari pentru invitatii. Martea

Reinventeaza-te! Ai fost invitat de CHELARIU CRISTIAN-IULIAN la jocul Regleaza Linkutil ca pagina de Start de pe www.linkutil.ro cu castiguri de 500 RON saptamanal! Acest email este trimis tie pentru ca prietenul tau/prietena ta CHELARIU CRISTIAN-IULIAN se afla in concurs si are nevoie de sprijinul tau, deoarece sansele se maresc daca se fac mai multe inregistrari pentru invitatii. Martea

Reinventeaza-te! Ai fost invitat de CHELARIU CRISTIAN-IULIAN la jocul Regleaza Linkutil ca pagina de Start de pe www.linkutil.ro cu castiguri de 500 RON saptamanal! Acest email este trimis tie pentru ca prietenul tau/prietena ta CHELARIU CRISTIAN-IULIAN se afla in concurs si are nevoie de sprijinul tau, deoarece sansele se maresc daca se fac mai multe inregistrari pentru invitatii. Martea

Reinventeaza-te! Ai fost invitat de CHELARIU CRISTIAN-IULIAN la jocul Regleaza Linkutil ca pagina de Start de pe www.linkutil.ro cu castiguri de 500 RON saptamanal! Acest email este trimis tie pentru ca prietenul tau/prietena ta CHELARIU CRISTIAN-IULIAN se afla in concurs si are nevoie de sprijinul tau, deoarece sansele se maresc daca se fac mai multe inregistrari pentru invitatii. Martea

Reinventeaza-te! Ai fost invitat de CHELARIU CRISTIAN-IULIAN la jocul Regleaza Linkutil ca pagina de Start de pe www.linkutil.ro cu castiguri de 500 RON saptamanal! Acest email este trimis tie pentru ca prietenul tau/prietena ta CHELARIU CRISTIAN-IULIAN se afla in concurs si are nevoie de sprijinul tau, deoarece sansele se maresc daca se fac mai multe inregistrari pentru invitatii. Martea

Dragi compatrioti, Numele meu este Constantin Timoc. Candidez la postul de presedinte al Romaniei pentru a asigura tuturor cetatenilor locuri de munca cat mai bine platite, pentru a distruge coruptia care paralizeaza intreaga societate si pentru a accelera aderarea tarii noastre la Uniunea Europeana. Fac apel catre toti cetatenii sa aleaga presedinte al Romaniei un candidat care e cinstit,

Dear R users, I wonder if there is a simple way to select a random and non-overlapping subset of a vector? Say, I need to randomly select 10 out of 100 numbers in a vector V. By "non-overlapping" I mean that a number in any position in V (V[1]...V[100]) should be selected at most once (i.e. selection without recycling). I could simplu use a uniform distribution to generate selection

Tim: Are Ron & Jane of Santa Barbara your parents? We are good friends from Santa Barbara and my wife wants to send her a birthday card in Kansas City but we don''t have your address. Allan & Joyce Anderson -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL:

From: Colin Ian King <colin.king at canonical.com> [ Upstream commit 13649101a25c53c87f4ab98a076dfe61f3636ab1 ] Currently, the expression for calculating RON is always going to result in zero no matter the value of ram->mr[1] because the ! operator has higher precedence than the shift >> operator. I believe the missing parentheses around the expression before appying the !

From: Colin Ian King <colin.king at canonical.com> [ Upstream commit 13649101a25c53c87f4ab98a076dfe61f3636ab1 ] Currently, the expression for calculating RON is always going to result in zero no matter the value of ram->mr[1] because the ! operator has higher precedence than the shift >> operator. I believe the missing parentheses around the expression before appying the !

From: Colin Ian King <colin.king at canonical.com> [ Upstream commit 13649101a25c53c87f4ab98a076dfe61f3636ab1 ] Currently, the expression for calculating RON is always going to result in zero no matter the value of ram->mr[1] because the ! operator has higher precedence than the shift >> operator. I believe the missing parentheses around the expression before appying the !

From: Colin Ian King <colin.king at canonical.com> [ Upstream commit 13649101a25c53c87f4ab98a076dfe61f3636ab1 ] Currently, the expression for calculating RON is always going to result in zero no matter the value of ram->mr[1] because the ! operator has higher precedence than the shift >> operator. I believe the missing parentheses around the expression before appying the !

Hi, Static Analysis with CoverityScan as detected an issue with the setting of the RON pull value in function nvkm_gddr3_calc in drm/nouveau/bios/ramcfg.c This was introduced by commit: c25bf7b6155cb ("drm/nouveau/bios/ramcfg: Separate out RON pull value") CoverityScan reports the issue as follows: 84 case 0x20: 85 CWL = (ram->next->bios.timing[1] &

From: Colin Ian King <colin.king at canonical.com> Currently, the expression for calculating RON is always going to result in zero no matter the value of ram->mr[1] because the ! operator has higher precedence than the shift >> operator. I believe the missing parentheses around the expression before appying the ! operator will result in the desired result. [ Note, not tested ]

Signed-off-by: Roy Spliet <rspliet at eclipso.eu> --- drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/include/nvkm/subdev/bios/ramcfg.h | 1 + drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/nvkm/subdev/bios/rammap.c | 3 ++- drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/nvkm/subdev/bios/timing.c | 2 ++ drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/nvkm/subdev/fb/gddr3.c | 6 ++++-- 4 files changed, 9 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-) diff --git

Happily I got this to work, largely by trial-and-error. In hopes that this will help somebody else, my config.site ended up being: OBJECT_MODE=64 R_PAPERSIZE=letter CC=/usr/local/bin/gcc MAIN_LDFLAGS=-Wl,-brtl SHLIB_LDFLAGS=-Wl,-G Which is virtually identical to that recommended in R-admin: one of my problems was using "-W1,brtl" rather than "-W1,-brtl". This was R 2.0.1

Hello all, This is with Samba 4.0.0rc6 with the built-in DNS server. Found the problem in Samba 4.0.0rc5 originally, then updated to see if bug had been fixed between rc5 and rc6. I am trying to get mail working for a subdomain that is being managed by Samba 4. I added an MX record, but the problem here is that the Samba 4 DNS server isn't replying with the record: