similar to: Asymmetric load balancing

On Wed, 5 May 2004, Jack Moffitt wrote: > If the client limits are hit on the server, it sends back an HTTP > redirect with the location of a random mirror (not itself). This should > be transparent to clients and acheive the affect you want. You could > also combine with with round robin DNS to spread people over the servers > initially. > > Seems fairly elegant.

> I am finding this solution to be sub-par. Client-side caching seems to be > one of the culprits. When one of the bandwidth-constrained server IPs is > selected, and it's full, it seems that the client never switches to > another server on reconnect. Using Winamp as the client right now on > Windows XP (for testing). Only flushing all the DNS caches up the chain >

I have three Icecast-2.0.0 servers up with possibly more coming online. I am trying to figure out how to do more intelligent load balancing between the three. Problem: There are bandwidth restrictions at a couple of the locations. Current Solution: Round-robin DNS (with very low TTL) and a restriction on the number of listeners on the servers where bandwidth is an issue. I am finding this

Hello, I started off by reading the Linux Advanced Routing & Traffic Control Howto, then searched a bit around the web. I see many documents discussing these matters with kernel 2.2.x but they are quite old, something around 1998-2000. I have some questions but I might as well start by exposing my setup to clarify things. I have a couple of internet links: a leased line of 256kbit/s and an

I want to add another server to my existing Samba environment and use DNS round robin to do load balancing. Both will use same smb.conf. Is anyone out there using this kind of setup? I have few quick questions: 1. Can "interfaces" statement be used in DNS round robin. If yes, then how? 2. Should "preferred master= yes" be defined on both boxes? Thanks.

Hello, I have a question about multichannel and the load-balancing algorithm. What kind of algorithm is it? (Roud-robin, dynamic round-robin, ...) What are the arguments the algorithm compute to load-balance the network traffic on the interfaces? I already know that if a 10Gb/s interface and a 1Gb/s interfaces are in the multichannel connection the 1Gb/s one will be ignored until the 10Gb/s goes

This ''MSN'' is a web site? Im guessing it ''refresh''es every 5 minutes or so. They are proably testing cookies against the ip address they appear to be comming from. This is horribly wreckless of them if they arnt offering IPv6. Are they? They only way i have to remedy this problem is to get their IP range and bind it to the most stable connexion you have,

Hi, We have the following config: Servers -> BGP router (10 Gbit) -> BGP router (1 Gbit) -> BGP router (100 mbit) We would like to do the following. The server should first fill the 100 mbit link, then fill the 1 Gbit link, and then the 10 Gbit link, when traffic increases. The resverse applies when traffic decreases. I found lots of docs on

Hello, I have data which I have arcsin transformed to analyse. I want to plot my data with error bars however as my data is back-transformed my standard errors are uneven. Is there a simple way to draw these asymmetric error bars in R? Thanks for your help. [[alternative HTML version deleted]]

On Fri, Dec 19, 2014 at 2:40 PM, Brian Mathis <brian.mathis+centos at betteradmin.com> wrote: > > > GPG is really what you want to be using for this. OpenSSL is a general > toolkit that provide a lot of good functions, but you need to cobble some > things together yourself. GPG is meant to handle all of the other parts of > dealing with files. > > I will expand on

We are running tinc (v. 1.0.26) in switch mode with bmx6 (another mesh protocol) running on top of the tap0 interface on about 25 devices. The asymmetric routing of UDP packets is causing my firewall and I presume others to drop some of the packets, since there are no outbound SYN packets originating from the device running tinc. Is there any way to mitigate this issue besides enabling tcponly

Hi, I was wondering if there was some sort of package or function that calculated asymmetric confidence intervals for small proportions. I thought of both the epicalc and epitools package, but I am hoping to find something where you can just plug in a standard error and point estimate and it will output the upper and lower CI bounds. Thanks! Sarah

We are currently using iproute2 to perform a round robin type load balancing. ip route add default proto static scope global nexthop via XXX.XXX.XXX.XXX dev eth0 weight 1 nexthop via XXX.XXX.XXX.XXX dev eth1 weight 1 nexthop via XXX.XXX.XXX.XXX dev eth2 weight 1 >From my understanding this is destination based load balancing. And

On Fri, Dec 19, 2014 at 3:48 PM, Les Mikesell <lesmikesell at gmail.com> wrote: > On Fri, Dec 19, 2014 at 2:40 PM, Brian Mathis > <brian.mathis+centos at betteradmin.com> wrote: > > > > > > GPG is really what you want to be using for this. OpenSSL is a general > > toolkit that provide a lot of good functions, but you need to cobble some > > things

On Wed, Dec 17, 2014 at 12:14 PM, Xinhuan Zheng <xzheng at christianbook.com> wrote: > Hello CentOS list, > I have a requirement that I need to use encryption technology to encrypt > very large tar file on a daily basis. The tar file is over 250G size and > those are data backup. Every night the server generated a 250G data backup > and it?s tar?ed into one tarball file. I

Hi R-users, Where can I find the code for asymmetric t-copula in R? Thank you for any help given. [[alternative HTML version deleted]]

Hi R-users, Where can I find the code for asymmetric t-copula in R? Thank you for any help given. [[alternative HTML version deleted]]

Hi, I'm running Asterisk with HFC-S card connected to HW PBX in my office. When I make a call from home using iaxComm connected to Office Asterisk, the outgoing latency is about 0.25 sec, which is quite OK. But to incoming latency begins on 0.5 sec and in a minute it's about 5 seconds (!) and growing fast. The thing I really don't understand that the latency is asymmetric and

Hello, Thanks for all feedback I got. I am pretty sure that if I used ?openssl enc? method, it is able to handle large file over 250g size perfectly. I think openssl installed on the system is capable of doing large file support. However, when using ?openssl smime?, it is not able to. Apparently it?s smime method limitations, not the openssl. Other than smime and enc, what other methods can I use

Hi R-users, Anybody got any idea where can I find the code for asymmetric t-copula? I found the copula package written by Jun Yan. Thank you so much for any help given. [[alternative HTML version deleted]]