similar to: Can you test my radio, pls

On Wed, Jun 17, 2020 at 07:55:05AM +0000, Philipp Schafft wrote: > Why does Icecast forward both requests? Very simple: Not all auth setups > require username:password. E.g. some are only for logging and > accounting. Some auth using the IP address, which is already known in > the first request. Indeed. One of my streams has requested geoblocking, which uses exactly the mechanism you

Hi, Please for the third Times, i want to be unsubscribed. Tnx ________________________________ From: Icecast <icecast-bounces at xiph.org> on behalf of Bananradion <bananradion at gmail.com> Sent: Thursday, October 29, 2020 11:24:03 AM To: Icecast streaming server user discussions <icecast at xiph.org> Subject: Re: [Icecast] how to unsubsribe? At the bottom of this page:

Hi, I am missing beplow each mail how one can un-subscribe. Can that be added please? thanks Op 28-10-2020 om 16:06 schreef Mayiani, Martin Martine - mayianmm: > Thanks > > > Martin > > -----Original Message----- > From: Patricia Moynihan <pmoynihan at fsu.edu> > Sent: Wednesday, October 28, 2020 10:10 AM > To: Icecast streaming server user discussions

Hi, I've removed you from the list, as you requested. On 29 Oct 2020, at 11:41, IAM IAM wrote: > Hi, > Please for the third Times, i want to be unsubscribed. > Tnx > ________________________________ > From: Icecast <icecast-bounces at xiph.org> on behalf of Bananradion > <bananradion at gmail.com> > Sent: Thursday, October 29, 2020 11:24:03 AM > To:

At the bottom of this page: http://lists.xiph.org/mailman/listinfo/icecast Den tors 29 okt. 2020 kl 11:21 skrev Varón <milongavaronnl at gmail.com>: > Hi, > > I am missing beplow each mail how one can un-subscribe. > > Can that be added please? > > > thanks > > Op 28-10-2020 om 16:06 schreef Mayiani, Martin Martine - mayianmm: > > Thanks > > >

I believe Dan has added a pass to compute livein / liveout values. Evan Sent from my iPhone On May 30, 2009, at 5:03 AM, Rotem Varon <varonrotem at gmail.com> wrote: > Thank you. > > Is it possible to determine the liveout of the operands (see example > bellow) ? > > %5 = add i32 %4, %3 > > For '%5': i can simply use "

The pass you're referring to is in include/llvm/Analysis/LiveValues.h and lib/Analysis/LiveValues.cpp. It computes conservative approximations for specific liveness queries, rather than full livein/liveout information. It's intended to be used as a heuristic. Dan On May 30, 2009, at 3:51 PM, Evan Cheng wrote: > I believe Dan has added a pass to compute livein / liveout values. >

Hi, Thank you for your answer. But let me get it straight, when i compile code with the llvm compiler, and my basic block pass is being processed, other passes are concurrently being processed ? Thanks. On Sat, May 23, 2009 at 7:01 PM, John Criswell <criswell at cs.uiuc.edu> wrote: > Rotem Varon wrote: > > Hi, > > > > Is there an API for getting (within a basic block

Thank you. Is it possible to determine the liveout of the operands (see example bellow) ? %5 = add i32 %4, %3 For '%5': i can simply use " i->isUsedOutsideOfBlock() " For '%3' and '%4' : this is the question ... >From your answer, is it possible to determine *which* value is liveout ( in binary instruction)? On Sat, May 30, 2009 at 2:57 AM,

Rotem Varon wrote: > Hi, > > Let say i am writing a code inside basic block pass and iterating all > the instructions inside, > and i encountered in this instruction : If you're asking how to get the operands of an Instruction, use the getOperand() method: Value * Operand1 = I->getOperand(0); Value * Operand2 = I->getOperand(1); The LLVM doxygen documentation

On Sun, May 10, 2009 at 15:17, Rotem Varon <varonrotem at gmail.com> wrote: > I am running a basic block pass (and iterating through each instruction). > Is it possible to convert the basic block instruction form llvm IR to x86 IR > WITHIN the path ? > It seems to me that phi nodes would mean that you can't convert any unit smaller than a function to native code. ~ Scott

Hi, I believe that my question isn't clear. So, please let me rephrase : I am running a basic block pass (and iterating through each instruction). Is it possible to convert the basic block instruction form llvm IR to x86 IRWITHIN the path ? I mean: is LLVM API exists for this purpose ? Again, thanks. On Sun, May 10, 2009 at 10:30 PM, me22 <me22.ca at gmail.com> wrote: > On Sun,

Rotem Varon wrote: > Hi, > > Is there an API for getting (within a basic block pass) the number of basic block in the program ? > Not of which I am aware. You will probably need to write code that does this for you. One place to put the code would be in the doInitialization() method of the BasicBlockPass that you're writing. However, I'm not sure if the count would be

On Jun 2, 2009, at 5:54 AM, Rotem Varon wrote: > > This questions are on the LiveValues pass: > Do i need to set the "LiveValues" pass in the PassManager as a > prerequisite? if so how do i get the results ? Yes; it's a standard analysis pass. See http://llvm.org/docs/WritingAnLLVMPass.html for information about interactions between passes. > How do i get/use the

On May 29, 2009, at 11:37 PM, Rotem Varon wrote: > How can i know, if a value have uses outside of the current basic > block (liveout), without iterating through all the basic block ? If the value is created within the basic block in question, and the block doesn't loop to itself, then you can just iterate through the uses and note if the use is an instruction in a different

On May 30, 2009, at 5:03 AM, Rotem Varon wrote: > Is it possible to determine the liveout of the operands (see example > bellow) ? > > %5 = add i32 %4, %3 > > For '%5': i can simply use " i->isUsedOutsideOfBlock() " > For '%3' and '%4' : this is the question ... By definition, operands are live out if they're used in any

Thank you you answer. On Sun, May 10, 2009 at 12:48 AM, Eli Friedman <eli.friedman at gmail.com>wrote: > On Sat, May 9, 2009 at 8:37 AM, Rotem Varon <varonrotem at gmail.com> wrote: > > Its not x86 IR nor x86 assembly. I have x86 IR "like" instructions ( add > > R1, R2, R3 and so...) > >> > >> If it's really > >> x86

Hi, I tried to use the LiveValues pass without success. I did exactly as you wrote me but no luck for me. I am getting this error : [rotem at localhost ~]$ opt -load /home/rotem/Desktop/install/Release/lib/BBPass.so -BBPass < /home/rotem/Desktop/tmp/BBtry.bc > /dev/null Error opening '/home/rotem/Desktop/install/Release/lib/BBPass.so':

" All of these answers are things you would do for an individual LLVM "Value". " I am sorry, but may be i am missing something here. In the previous email you suggested the function "bool isLiveOut(Instruction* I) ". So, if you please, explain how i can find out if a llvm::Value (not an llvm::Instruction) is live out or not. As i understand it, isLiveOut can help me

On Sat, May 9, 2009 at 5:35 AM, Rotem Varon <varonrotem at gmail.com> wrote: > I need to add a new optimization to the LLVM compiler. Knowing what the optimization does would be very helpful here. > The optimization ALREADY written for x86 IR (i mean that the code that > handles the optimization is designated to work on assembly 86) . It's designed to work on x86 assembly, or