similar to: Routing all connections through a OpenVPN tunnel

Hi, I cannot get my network up in WinXP- and winVISTA-domU''s I need some help, since I got lost in the google-jungle... My system: UBUNTU gutsy gibon-AMD64 on a intel core duo-system. this is my /etc/xen/winxp.cfg: ######### # # Configuration file for the Xen instance debian.qwork.test, created # by xen-tools 3.5 on Sun Mar 16 20:03:26 2008. # # # Kernel + memory size # kernel =

Hello, Despite of reading a lot of descriptions I don''t understand the network configuration. I simply have too little experience. I work remote with the machine via ssh. My dom0 is running. I copied an existing installation into a LV and created the following file: # cat /etc/xen/domu-sarge # -*- mode: python; -*- kernel = "/boot/vmlinuz-2.6.18-4-xen-686" #kernel =

Hello @all, thanks for all the helpfull answers in this mailing list. They helped me compiling a new kernel 2.6.10.11 with Xen 2.0.6 (my first one), setting up a dom0 with RAID, LVM and loop devices for domU, integrating a second network as xen-br1 (I''m calling the /etc/xen/scripts/network script from within /etc/init.d/xend to bring up / down the second bridge.) and bootstrapping

Hi, I''m using Xen 3.0.3 on two servers with Debian Etch (amd64). These servers have 10 nics (2 onboard and 8 in two 4-port cards) so that every vm can have its own interface. This worked so far with the Xen Version from Etch with a wrapper script wich started 10 bridges at boot time. But now I''ve updated Xen on one of these server to Xen 3.2.0 from backports.org and now the

Hello. I have installed the SuSE Linux 10 XEN kernel but no domU yet. Now I cannot ping to and from dom0. I get lots of ARP broadcasts from dom0 but dom0 seems to ignore ARP answers. When pinging to dom0 it ignores arp requests. This happens regardless xend is running or not. This happens in the xen kernel only, when booting stock kernel all works as expected. What can I do? Robert

Hello all, I had setup shorewall before succesfully with a normal LAN to internet connection. Now I''m connected to the internet via VPN and I got problems with configuring Shorewall. Any help is appreciated. This is my setup: - Gentoo Linux laptop (kernel gentoo-dev-sources-2.6.8.1) with Shorewall 2.0.4 (setup for Standalone one interface) and iptables 1.2.11 - VPN client is

Hallo Mailinglist:), i used xen 4.1 with xend xm a while. I compiled the unstable 4.2 today and most thinks run fine :). I have only one big problem, the network for my guestsystems. It don't want to work. Hopefully somebody can help me. In Xen 4.1 i only wrote the following line in my questconfig: vif = [ "bridge=eth0,script=vif-bridge" ] And everything works fine. This does not

I have a setup with two Internet providers. One circuit (net0 == eth1) is used primarily for employees and tunnels to other sites. The other (net1 == eth2) is for the production machines that customers access. Everythung works in teh sense that packets get to where they are sent (mostly) but I recently I had a sniffer on the system and noticed a problem I cannot solve. traffic coming in

In spite of reading howtos and this mailing list now for several weeks, I am still not able to get the network of my winXP guest connected to the host (opensuse 10.2) or the external network. There are some network interfaces missing on my host (peth0, vif0.0). ifconfig: eth0 Protokoll:Ethernet Hardware Adresse 00:18:8B:B3:1A:AC inet Adresse:192.168.0.66 Bcast:192.168.0.255

xm list reveals the following information... Name Id Mem(MB) CPU State Time(s) Console Domain-0 0 315 0 r---- 2058.1 Domain-1 11 342 0 -b--- 5.2 9611 Domain-2 12 342 0 -b--- 3.9 9612 Xen seems to be working beautifully but I have not yet figured out how to get Domain-0 to ping both Domain-1 and Domain-2,

Hi I''m testing around with xen 3.0 snapshot from last week. And i''m now having a problem with a xenbr which is based on a vlan if (dot1q). this is all in dom0 os: debian testing network: tg3 I can start the bridge based on my normal physical eth0 which is working without any problems. My clan without bridge is also working. I can start the bridge based on a vlan if with help

Hi everybody, I have been using Shorewall for quite a while now but I recently stumbled over a new setup that stopped me cold. I don''t know how to proceed: I have an ordinary GNU/Linux box (2.6.11) connected to a nonpublic network with one interface eth0 which gets an IP through DHCP like 172.17.x.y. Traffic is not routed to the Internet in this subnet. In order to connect to the

Hi, i allready searched the archives, but found no message that really helps me. i am running debian etch on dom0 and debian sarge on domU. I had a running setup with debain sarge on dom0 before, but now with etch i can not get networking to work in domU. I use routed networking, but the same seems to happen with bridged networking: eth0 within domU is not brought up. I think it maybe related

hi, i need eth1 for an adsl connection via rp-pppoe (pppd). I was able to hide eth1 in Dom0, but how i use this device in DomU? Do i have to load the 8139too modul, to have eth1 in DomU? cu denny -- Sicherheit verständlich http://www.sides.de GnuPG Key http://pgp.upb.de:11371/pks/lookup?op=get&search=0xAB7D3FE0 _______________________________________________ Xen-users mailing list

Hi, I am new to VPN an OpenVPN with shorewal. I tryed a lot and read a bounch of howto''s but nothing helped so I came here. I want to tunnel all request to my server 141.48.XXX.XXX from my home network throu port 443. I want to do this because this is the only way I can connect to my server using ssh or ony other tool or port. On Port 80 Apache is running, so I only have the https port

i have quite some problems getting 2 lans together with tinc, setup is : 2 linuxrouter connected to the inet. behind everyone is a subnet 192.168.0.0/255.255.0.0 with some normal windowsworkstations. these 2 subnets should be merged to one. we already connected the 2 linuxboxes with tinc and it worked smooth. but the subnets behind the routers werent pingable. so I thought we need ethernet

Hi I have a default route to 192.168.1.1 as soon as I start shorewall the default route dissapear. What do I need to do to have it not disappear. Kind Regards My network setup /etc/network/interfaces: # The primary network interface auto eth0 iface eth0 inet static address 192.168.1.17 netmask 255.255.255.0 network 192.168.1.0 broadcast 192.168.1.255

Hi ! First of all, I am sorry if this is not the list for that, but I've been learning (a little bit...) a way to implement a freeBSD firewall. So far I came up with a set of rules I would like to show you for commenting. I am sure there're a lot of errors and/or stupid rules (I am not sure the rules order is good for what I need) and I would be really pleased if one could have a look

Hi, I have recently updated one of my systems from CentOs 6.4 to CentOS 6.5. This systems is used as a RIPv2 routing server with quagga which is the termination point of some GRE tunnels. While running CentOS 6.4 I see the multicast packages arriving at the eth0 and the GRE tunnel interface. While running under CentOs 6.5 I can see the multicast packages arriving at the eth0 but not on the GRE

Hi security@ list, In my self written, large ipfw rule set, I had something that passed http to allow me to browse most but not all remote sites. For years I assumed the few sites I had difficulty with were cases pppoed MTU != 1500, from not having installed tcpmssd on my 4.*-RELEASE, but then running 6.1-RELEASE I realised that wasn't the problem. http://www.web.de Still failed, &