similar to: IPv6 full support (future wish)

Hi Philipp, Thank you for the information. sorry for the unclear question. I do not know that we can use a full IPv6 address in bind-address item. I can not find it in the documents. Can we use it on all 2.4 versions? Best regards, Michel Philipp Schafft schreef op 2018-08-15 12:40: > Good morning, > > On Wed, 2018-08-15 at 11:15 +0200, Michel van Dop wrote: > >> Hi,

Good morning, On Wed, 2018-08-15 at 11:15 +0200, Michel van Dop wrote: > Hi, > > Thanks for the beautiful product, i use it for a long time. Very > stable! > > I would like in a new version that IPv6 fully works like IPv4 > <bind-address>. > > Now we can only use :: With multiple interfaces the use it all on that > port, this is difficult for multi

Hi all, I love this project, Gluster and Ganesha are amazing. Thank you for this great work! The only thing that I miss is IPv6 support. I know that there are some challenges and that?s OK. For me it?s not important whether Gluster servers use IPv4 or IPv6 to speak each other and replicate data. The only thing that I?d like to have is a floating IPv6 for clients when I use Ganesha (just IPv6,

Hello Maybe someone could direct us to right solution with the problem descibed below. We tried different trick bo no success stories. We have a development cluster based on Dell R815 servers (+-30) and a storage server - Netapp FAS 3240 runnig Data Ontap 8.1p2. We have some 100 virtual servers - we use Xen 4.1 for virtualisation. A basics OS is Debian Squeeze with some backports packages

I?ve held off reporting this since I thought it might just be some kind of fluke, but I?ve seen it now on three different boxes. The symptom is that the stock configuration of Apache only listens for IPv6 connections: $ netstat -na | grep :80.*LISTEN tcp6 0 0 :::80 :::* LISTEN You should see a second line there for IPv4, but you don't:

Hello all, I'll cut to the chase -- several weeks ago, I thought I had an upstart configuration file that would start Samba4 when the VM was turned on; but it turns out I was wrong. At the time there was nothing on the wiki about it (the links were broken). The script I thought was working was simply: start on runlevel [2345] exec /usr/local/samba/sbin/samba In any case, looking at the

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 Hi, I'm using tinc to connect a couple of ipv6 capable machines using a mix of upd6, udp4, tcp6 and tcp4. Now I wanted to add an linux embedded device, which has no ipv6 support at all. Tinc did compile and configuration is fine (tested on other machine), but after connecting the embedded device to other hosts tinc instances, it suddenly crashes.

On Mon, 26 Feb 2018 11:09:55 +0200 Arcadie Cracan <arcadiec at gmail.com> wrote: > Dear Rowland, > > This is the contents of the files: > > /etc/hostname: > lotus > > /etc/hosts: > > /etc/resolv.conf: > > > # > > netstat -tlnp > > /etc/krb5.conf: > > > /etc/samba/smb.conf: Hmm, either something went wrong with

The first place I went to for test advice and planning recommendations was http://wiki2.dovecot.org/TestInstallation - The very first test failed. Doc says: Next check that Dovecot is listening for connections: # telnet localhost 143 Trying 127.0.0.1... Connected to localhost. Escape character is '^]'. * OK [CAPABILITY IMAP4rev1 LITERAL+ SASL-IR LOGIN-REFERRALS ID ENABLE STARTTLS

On Thu, 31 May 2018 15:37:20 +0200 "L.P.H. van Belle via samba" <samba at lists.samba.org> wrote: > Hai, > > Yes, but with or without internal dns server, the command is missing > ports. > > netstat -plaunt | egrep "ntp|bind|named|samba|?mbd" > > And do note here that i used the "bind" for bind and winBIND > detection. >

Centos users, I new to Centos 7 and my problem is the following: I am using my Centos 7 system as a print server in a warehouse. Using cups for the print queue's. Which I can print to the printers find from the Centos 7 machine. The hosting system is Sco Unix using lpd printing. This machine is in Illinois and the warehouse / Centos 7 machine is in Arizona. I have loaded

Hai Marcio, ? I've checked the script output, that looks good. ? Just two small comments, - The hosts file, if your resolving is correctly working then you could remove the other DC's and FS from it, but it does not hurt is you keep it as is. - As long your are sure the DNS servers are ok and all needed zones are in these "proxy?dns" server. that should be fine also. ??? (

Hi Joachim, > Op 15 feb 2024 om 23:09 heeft Joachim Lindenberg via samba <samba at lists.samba.org> het volgende geschreven: > > ?Hi Rowland, > No, I don?t have so many devices yet. Rowland believes that one should not use IPv6 internally. Many disagree. > But I know some organizations that want to switch to IPv6 consistently and you can rephrase my question to whether

Hi, I have solved. I change parameter "listen-on port 53", as follows: From: listen-on port 53 { 192.168.1.20; 127.0.01; }; To: listen-on port 53 { any; }; netstat -lntup | grep 53 tcp 0 0 0.0.0.0:81 0.0.0.0:* OU?A 534/lighttpd tcp 0 0 192.168.1.20:53 0.0.0.0:* OU?A 1930/named tcp 0 0

I am installing a new Samba 4.2 Active Directory server on CentOS 7. I followed the Wiki instructions on how to create the server. I am using sernet-samba 4.2 binaries. Everything seems to be OK on the Linux side but I cannot get any windows client to successfully join the domain. Each attempt returns the following error message "RPC Server in not available". Below are the config file

Hello, for many years i used an mailserver with dovecot V1 very satisfied! http://mailserver.decotrain.de/ One of the reasons to use dovecot was a simply configuration. Dovecot was the best choice for IMAP for me! Now i updated the server to Debian testing with dovecot 2.1.7. It's not possible for me to get a running authentication for virtual mail users! I recently found this mailing and

I wanted to change this test so it tries connections on both IPv4 & IPv6. Having it connect on both is the easy bit. Harder was making it not fail on machines that don't have IPv6 stack (or IPv4 in some rare cases). TBH I wasn't able to test this, but it seems like this should work. In the end we want to modify nbdkit so it can listen on only certain interfaces, but that's a

Hi Rowland, Currently using Samba 4.8.5 2 x DCs running on CentOS 6.10 (Final) Configured 1 DC via classic upgrade, and the latter DC join AD forest. Would it be alright if I were to redo the classic upgrade? Hope to hear from you soon. Thanks and Regards On Fri, Jul 19, 2019 at 7:06 PM Rowland penny via samba < samba at lists.samba.org> wrote: > On 19/07/2019 11:13, Alfonso Conner

Hello I'm running Samba 3.6.6 on a Linux host on a LAN connected to the Net, with my ADSL modem acting as firewall/router so as to keep local services like Samba unaccessible from the Net. Still, I wanted to check if it's safe to have nmbd reachable from 0.0.0.0 on UDP137/138: ~# netstat -tunlp Active Internet connections (only servers) Proto Recv-Q Send-Q Local Address

Hi, >is Bind9 running ? Yes netstat -lntup | grep 53 tcp 0 0 127.0.0.1:953 0.0.0.0:* OU?A 13296/named tcp 0 0 0.0.0.0:49153 0.0.0.0:* OU?A 15105/samba: task[d tcp6 0 0 :::49153 :::* OU?A 15105/samba: task[d /etc/init.d/bind9 status ? bind9.service - BIND Domain