similar to: Windowsupdate & microsoft pages

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 This message was incorrectly discarded by Mailman -- I''m still looking for the cause. - -Tom |On Mon, 08 Nov 2004 14:17:17 -0800 |> "Muiz Motani" <muiz@i-dist.com> wrote: |> | |>> > Has anybody found an elegant way to solve this problem? I am sure that I |>> > am not the only one who has run into

My original thread got taken off-topic and seems to not want to get back on-topic. Does anybody have any ideas about my question? Here's the original text of my question. Thanks for any help. Wine 0.9 installation. I installed Internet Explorer using the manual procedure in the applications database. I then changed the version reporting to Windows 2000 using winecfg and then went to

samba-3.0.6, win2k will all patches from windowsupdate as of last friday Should it be possible to join an AD domain (win2k) without a password on the client side if the machine is already created in the ou=Computers container? I seem to be unable to do this: either "net ads join" will ask for a password or it will try with the current user's kerberos ticket and fail if this user

I've got several dozen Windows XP Pro computers in a Samba/Windows Domain. The problem is that with them being in the domain, automatic updates does not work on these computers. I think its because the people log into the computers with the default windows domain restrictions (you know, can't install anything, can't adjust the time on the clock, can't update drivers, etc).

Can I get your help? I try run Flash CS4 installer, but it works, But I got follow error. And it stops. wayne at linux-jr51:~/Soft/FlashCS4CHS> wine Setup.exe fixme:console:AttachConsole stub ffffffff fixme:advapi:SetNamedSecurityInfoW L"MACHINE\\Software\\Classes\\.svg" 4 4 (nil) (nil) 0x130f68 (nil) fixme:advapi:SetNamedSecurityInfoW L"MACHINE\\Software\\Classes\\.svgz"

I have a win2k domain ... 2 of the client machines are Red Hat (7.3 and 8.0). I set everything up to use the DC to authenticate ID/PW. Everything worked perfectly until a week or so ago ... Samba would automatically create a home folder and the whole nine yards. Now I can see the shares on the Samba machines, but I can't access them ... just prompts for the ID/PW over and over. I can mount

Hi there I am setting up a PDC with Centos 5 + Samba 3.5.4 + Openldap with Roaming profiles using kixstart tools to mount shared folder and modifing some registry entries on windows workstations, The Roaming profiles works fine between Win2000 and WinXP. but when I tried to join a Win7 or Vista workstations i get mixed errors. Sometimes the profiles loads sometimes not, or loads badly

Hello, This is not really a shorewall problem. But just wanted to check if this problem rang a bell with any of you. I have a linux router with slackware 9.1, and kernel 2.4.27 Everyting works ok except for access to web sites that use akamai from behind the router. >From the router machine itself I can access those sites without problems. But machines behind nat, take forever to access

Clients: Some sites just show the top area not the full page. Some sites cant be reached at all. I think it 90% may be the MTU/MSS problem. But I already have set the shorewall.conf CLAMPMSS=1400 or CLAMPMSS=Yes, but it doest make things good. I would be mad. Anybody helps me would so appreciated! If you want know more info. to diag my problem, I would be please to.

Hello, Since the ipmasq package has been dropped from debian I decided to migrate to shorewall. My setup is pretty simple: [DSL Modem] -eth0- [shorwall/gateway] -eth1- [local network] ipmasq required that I set the MTU on eth0 to 1492. Migrating to shorewall went well, but a small number of web sites would load slow or not at all. Setting the MTU on eth0 to 1492 and setting CLAMPMSS=Yes

Hi! How do you guys solve windows security updates? Is there a way to force windows computers to be updated. Even more flexible is if one can update windows through login script. Peter Nyberg Institutionen f?r Biokemi och Biofysik (DBB) Sv.Arrhenius v?gen 12 106 91 Stockholm Tel: 08-16 24 69 Mobil: 070 339 24 69 Fax 08 153679

> Currently, i have nodes with PMTUDiscovery =yes and ClampMSS = yes. Hello, these features were introduced in 1.0.13 correct ?? I also understand that the two settings are by default "yes" if not explictly set to "no" in the config file. what may happen if I have a network with mixed versions from 1.0.11 and 1.0.13, where the older daemons do not implement that feature

Hi I have a (bizarre) problem with ssh, which someone has suggested may be down to the MSS value being too high. I know that within Shorewall I can clamp the MSS value to the MTU-40 value, but is there a way I can set MSS to a discreet value? I just want to (dis)prove the MSS theory at the moment (I know it isn''t a real fix). Thanks, Keith

Aloha! I am new to tinc and I like to figure out my own issues before asking but I am not sure of my next step here. I am not sure if the problem is the VPN configuration or in my network. I will try to be as through as possible. I have two computers that are CentOS with the latest tinc from their respective repositories. Server A is behind a Sophos XG and Server B is behind a Ubiquiti Edge

Hi, I´m using Tinc for several years, but I didn´t fix a performance problem. There a about 20 nodes in this network. Master: 10.0.0.12 (dedicated host in a datacenter, debian, 100mBit port) tinc.conf: Name = TincKnoten12 AddressFamily = ipv4 Interface = tun ProcessPriority=high mode = router #DirectOnly = no Compression=0 PMTUDiscovery = yes #IndirectData = yes #ReplayWindow = 64 #ConnectTo

Currently, i have nodes with PMTUDiscovery =yes and ClampMSS = yes. When the server does not receive a PMTU request back from one of the clients even when the packet size is very small (say 164), then it reverts to TCP. Should i turn off PMTUDiscovery or should it be ok to leave on? It takes a very long time to do simple pings (1 second or so), so i wonder what else i can do?

Hi, I have a setup that consist of 2 firewalls connected over dialup and PPP. Each side of the ppp are protected by shorewall. One side of the PPP masquerades everything not addressed to the local network to its eth0 (the net). fw1 <---- ppp (dialup) -----> fw0 <----- NET When making an http request to a site on the Internet from the machine not directly connected to the net (fw1), the

Am 23.06.2020 08:43, schrieb Luca Bertoncello: And another thing, I discovered right now... > Could you suggest me something to restrict the problem? > Currently, I think the problem can be: > > 1) on Asterisk > 2) on my Gateway/Firewall A couple of years ago I added this entry in my firewall: /sbin/iptables -A FORWARD -p tcp --tcp-flags SYN,RST SYN -j TCPMSS

Am 23.06.2020 09:28, schrieb Marek Greško: Hi > if you need clampmss then it is highly probable there is a PMTU > discovery problem. The clampmss does not work for UDP. Is there a way to check if I have this problem? > I probably counted the size incorrectly. So you are able to ping with > size 1464 and not with 1466. How about trying same ping sizes from the > internet towards

I have problems connecting IPSEC VPN clients on the masqueraded network to outside VPN servers. It looks like this: ipsec-user | 192.168.1.10 (DHCP assigned) | | 192.168.1.1 fw-1 (shorewall, Linux 2.6) | 20.20.20.20 (internet) | 30.30.30.30 fw-2 (IPSEC VPN endpoint) | 192.168.100.1 | | 192.168.100.2 server ipsec-user (a road warrior) is supposed to create an IPSEC tunnel to his home