similar to: can''t use shorewall in a UML-Session

> call void @llvm.dbg.declare( { }* bitcast(i32* %loc0 to { }*), { }* bitcast (%llvm.dbg.variable.type* @llvm.dbg.variable1 to { }*) ) This is not legal. The distinction here is that the bitcast as an argument is a constant expression and requires constant arguments, and %loc0 is not constant. Introducing the temp variable is the "right way" to do this. - Daniel -----

I have been trying to compile some Llvm code that I generate, and I am running into a problem assembling my ll code. Here is a snippet of the code I am trying to compile: %loc0 = alloca i32 call void @llvm.dbg.declare( { }* bitcast(i32* %loc0 to { }*), { }* bitcast (%llvm.dbg.variable.type* @llvm.dbg.variable1 to { }*) ) I get an error from the second line of code: Invalid

This is a proposal to add strong GC reference types to LLVM. We have some local (downstream) patches that are needed to prevent LLVM's optimizer from making transforms that are problematic in the presence of a precise relocating GC. Adding a notion of a strong GC reference to LLVM will let us upstream these patches in a principled manner, and will act as a measure to avoid new problematic

Hi Andy, Andrew Trick wrote: > Sanjoy, > > This looks very close to my understanding of the statepoint design trajectory when you first introduced it. It’s great that you followed through and took the time to formalize the IR semantics. It’s been a couple years since I’ve thought about it so I may ask some obtuse questions. > > I think he subject line is wrong though! Did

Inline. From: Philip Reames [mailto:listmail at philipreames.com] Sent: Thursday, August 27, 2015 11:01 AM To: Swaroop Sridhar <Swaroop.Sridhar at microsoft.com>; llvm-dev <llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org>; Sanjoy Das <sanjoy at playingwithpointers.com> Cc: Joseph Tremoulet <jotrem at microsoft.com>; Andy Ayers <andya at microsoft.com>; Russell Hadley <rhadley at

Hi, I found 3 typos. >+3. Get Guest Firmware named as Flash.fd, and put it under right place: >+ (1) If you have the guest firmware (binary)released by Intel >Corp for Xen, you can use it directly. >+ (2) If you want to build a guest firmware form souce code. souce ---> source >+5. Known possbile issue on some platforms with old Firmware >+ possbile ---> possible

A colleague, using CentOS 5 64-bit, installed by me, asked me for the following assistance: "The site I was trying to get to was http://www.eclipsedownload.com/. I downloaded the EclipseUML free version, but it's obviously not giving me the information I need. I have Java packages in Eclipse that I would like to display in a class diagram to show how they relate to one another.

Hello, Has anyone got this working? I'm looking around for a virtual system implementation and this one seems lightweight. Thanks. Dave.

Has anyone been able to get UserModeLinux to work under CentOS5? I've got an image which works fine under CentOS4.4 but when I try it under CentOS5 then it hangs just after mounting root kjournald starting. Commit interval 5 seconds EXT3-fs: mounted filesystem with ordered data mode. VFS: Mounted root (ext3 filesystem) readonly. Now, I'd read this was a known issue because of

Is anyone aware of a tool that can take my RoR code and model the views, controllers, helpers, layouts, etc? Chris M. -- Posted via http://www.ruby-forum.com/.

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA512 Hi, Any chance of getting a snapshot/patch to apply to 2.6.21? Also, the FAQ doesn't mention UML but at a glance the two virtualizations look very similar - or am I missing something? The address space stuff looks like what skas0 does in uml? Cheers Antoine -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2.0.3 (GNU/Linux) Comment: Using GnuPG

Hey ..This looks very much like the user-mode linux i used to work on. not gone thru the Xen specs but what crossbow looks like is solaris version of UML[user-mode linux] . last time i was almost killed testing free/swan on a virtual testbed using UML. gosh... matching the root filesystem version with the kernel was the biggest fight...lately had to build my own with mkrootfs :) ... best view of

Hello, For those those who speak french and are interested. I wrote a guide about Uml and Xen virtualisation solution for course purpose. Cheers, François Visconte _______________________________________________ Xen-users mailing list Xen-users@lists.xensource.com http://lists.xensource.com/xen-users

Any body here has used ruby-uml from http://ruby-uml.rubyforge.org/ ?? I dont know how to use it, would you mind to share your experience on it? OR Have you found plug-in or gem for generating application code like controllers, models, views to sequence diagram ? I have tried RailRoad, but it can not create sequence diagram, only class diagram for controllers and models. Thank You for your

On UML: the klibc architecture is the underlying architecture, so set KLIBCARCH to SUBARCH. Signed-off-by: H. Peter Anvin <hpa at zytor.com> --- commit 018604e070e143657abcf0cb256a1e2dda205d97 tree 1b853903ca6af49d9f437cfd694aec61ef1d488e parent baacd5d81ff7151e8df3893850ec363441886a1e author H. Peter Anvin <hpa at zytor.com> Mon, 15 May 2006 21:25:33 -0700 committer H. Peter Anvin

* zach@vmware.com (zach@vmware.com) wrote: > Attempt to fix the UML build by assuming the default i386 subarchitecture > (mach-default). > > I can't fully test this because spinlock breakage is still happening in > my tree, but it gets rid of the mach_xxx.h missing file warnings. I assume this is intended to fix a build error caused by patches in the earlier set which added

* zach@vmware.com (zach@vmware.com) wrote: > Attempt to fix the UML build by assuming the default i386 subarchitecture > (mach-default). > > I can't fully test this because spinlock breakage is still happening in > my tree, but it gets rid of the mach_xxx.h missing file warnings. I assume this is intended to fix a build error caused by patches in the earlier set which added

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA512 Hi, Any chance of getting a snapshot/patch to apply to 2.6.21? Also, the FAQ doesn't mention UML but at a glance the two virtualizations look very similar - or am I missing something? The address space stuff looks like what skas0 does in uml? Cheers Antoine -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2.0.3 (GNU/Linux) Comment: Using GnuPG

Hello list, I'd like to know if people use UML tool to analyze and/or document LLVM/Clang. I use StarUML. It's free and very good though it's free. But I consider using a commercial program. Because the organization I belong is willing to support for this. I don't think I will use these tools to write code. I think I will use these to do a documentation and analyze code. So the

On Mon, Dec 24, 2012 at 2:08 AM, Journeyer J. Joh <oosaprogrammer at gmail.com> wrote: > Do you use one of these tools? If so let me know your experience. > And I don't believe people use these to generate code for LLVM/Clang. I personally don't use any tool like that. My impression is that most developers here do not use any kind of UML code generation; I could, of course,