similar to: Just getting prepared

Hi all, I read the setup at http://www.blackh0le.net/articles/vpn-dun-howto.html to setup my VPN. However, I'm having a problem which I think is proxy-ARP not working. I like to ask you to see if you know what's going on. When I ping 10.77.1.1 from windows XP machine the packets get to the 10.77.1.1 machine, but they don't have a return path to get back. When I do ping the windows

Yes your chap-secret file could be the issue, it should look like this: Your_usrname * Your_password * That?s it :) But if that don?t work include this file to the list: /etc/ppp/pptpd-options It should look something like this: ipparam PoPToP lock mtu 1490 mru 1490 ms-wins 172.x.y.1 ms-dns 172.x.y.1 multilink proxyarp auth +chapms-v2 ipcp-accept-local ipcp-accept-remote lcp-echo-failure 30

I’ve got a problem that I have ignored for a month or 3 J I’m almost certain this is not a Shorewall problem, but I’ll share it anyway ;) I have 2 ISP connection, with load balancing. here’s some routing stuff: rama-kandra root # ip route show 202.37.230.64/26 dev eth2 proto kernel scope link src 202.37.230.93 192.168.1.0/24 dev eth0 proto kernel scope link src 192.168.1.1

Hi, while testing racoon on Linux (based on the ported ipsec-tools) the following issue appeared: Racoon did not verify the RSA Signatures during Phase 1 in either main or aggressive mode. Authentication was possible using a correct certificate and a wrong private key. I have verified the below problem using racoon-20030711 on FreeBSD 4.9. I will test it using the SNAP Kit but suspect it to be

Ok, on to new swamps. I would like to enable PPTP on CentOS4 to accept connections from clients running MicroSoft Win2K and XP pro from outside our firewall. I am testing pptpd-1.2.3-0 and tells me that I need kernel support for MPPE, which I suppose is MicroSoft's own form of PtoP encryption. Is there a way of doing this without rebuilding the kernel? If so, how? Regards, Jim --

Hi, configuration of PPTP for windows clients , using MPPE causes kernel crash. It is a known bug which is in bugzilla on RedHat https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=248716 I was thinking that CentOS 5.1 has allready a kernel patched , but as it seems NOT. Or am i wrong? Thanks David Hlacik -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL:

I'm setting up a PPTP VPN server on a client domain and am having an odd issue. If I run ntlm_auth on the command-line, it works as expected. However, if I run it with my PPTP server, it denies access to every user. MY setup is that I have a few AD users in an AD group named "PPTP". I have the following in my pptp-options file. The server is Debian Squeeze 64bit. name vpn01 domain

On 27/10/15 21:05, Ryan Ashley wrote: > I am not sure how to determine the separator, The separator is easy to establish, do you have a line in smb.conf that starts 'winbind separator =" , if you do, then whatever is after the '=' is the separator, if you haven't got the line, then you are using the default '\' Rowland > but 'which' shows >

Hello... Im trying to setup HTB to allow me to shape traffic from two upstreams that meets on single lan0 interface. I prefer to use HTB qdisc within HTB root qdisc for cleaner rules design. Seems that it doesnt work at all. tc -s class show doesnt show any traffic on other classes attached to HTB qdisc. Linux 2.6.20.7 iproute-2.6.20-070313 Weird thing is that tc -s class show that 1: and 2:

On 28/10/15 13:45, Ryan Ashley wrote: > Thank you, Rowland. I will be going by this afternoon and I will check. > The thing is, if it IS "\", how do I enter that into the pptp-options > file? The entire list of parameters are in quotes, so do I need a > double-backslah or anything? > > Lead IT/IS Specialist > Reach Technology FP, Inc > > On 10/27/2015 05:21 PM,

I am not sure how to determine the separator, but 'which' shows "/usr/bin/ntlm_auth". I already ran it while on-site. Since it is broken, I cannot remote in. I will have to show up on-site again, possibly Thursday. Lead IT/IS Specialist Reach Technology FP, Inc On 10/27/2015 01:41 PM, Michael Wandel wrote: > Hey, > > On 27.10.2015 17:53, Ryan Ashley wrote: >>

I''m converting my network from a "one interface per segment" to a "single connection with vlans", well, some hardware I have requires using different vlan IDs. suffice it to say I need bridges to connect a few different vlans that should all be one but can''t be because of firmware constraints. so my first step is to get shorewall to know about bridges.

My goal is to make VPN access to our Samba PDC (FreeBSD 7.0) so that users can access there home shares from Windows clients. I have read the instructions at http://samba.org/ftp/unpacked/lorikeet/pppd/final-report.pdf, but I can't make it work. Don't know if is due to my lack of skills or has something to do with the Popop functionality in FreeBSD. Following the instructions, i made a

OK So i took the time and finally built a RPM for the softether vpn server and client. I have not tested them for usage but I found out that only the server side can work with multiple protocols while the client side works only with one protocol. The actual protocol is called "ethernet overl HTTPS". More info on the product: http://www.softether.org/ The gui is only for windows as

On 28/10/15 18:10, Ryan Ashley wrote: > That is client setup. We have that under control. Our Linux users use > Network Manager to connect and our Windows users use the stuff built > into Windows. My problem is server-side. The server is a PPTP VPN > (running via pptpd) and I have to add the lines below to make it work. > > plugin winbind.so > ntlm_auth-helper

Thank you, Rowland. I will be going by this afternoon and I will check. The thing is, if it IS "\", how do I enter that into the pptp-options file? The entire list of parameters are in quotes, so do I need a double-backslah or anything? Lead IT/IS Specialist Reach Technology FP, Inc On 10/27/2015 05:21 PM, Rowland Penny wrote: > On 27/10/15 21:05, Ryan Ashley wrote: >> I am

On 9/17/2015 4:47 PM, Eliezer Croitoru wrote: > I have a server currently connecting to a pptp remote server. > This server(lns\lac) has the option for pptp connections and l2tp > connections. > The l2tp connections are not using ipsec encryption at all. PPTP doesn't use ipsec either, it uses its own MPPE encryption based on RC4, which is considered insecure as of years ago.

Hey John, I do not require encryption at all, it's a secure and internal channel but it requires me to connect via either pptp or l2tp. This is the reason I am asking. I had the chance of finding the SoftEther Project which gives a lot in terms of VPN Client and Server. At: http://www.softether-download.com/en.aspx But yet to try it. Also they have all sorts of beta versions but not

I try to setup a PPTP VPN server on Centos 7 and from client a router Vodafone Station (Firmware 5.4.8.1.316.1.21) On c7 I have install this: [root at s-virt tmp]# rpm -q pptpd ppppptpd-1.4.0-2.el7.x86_64ppp-2.4.5- 33.el7.x86_64 and setup all file and firewall like howto say.This now is my config: /etc/pptpd.conf:option /etc/ppp/options.pptpd/etc/pptpd.conf:logwtmp/etc/pptpd.conf:localip

Hello to everyone, Here is the situation: [LAN1]---[eth3]/----------\ | LinuxBR |[eth2]---[LAN0]---[linuxGW]---[internet] [LAN2]---[eth4]\----------/ Whole LAN is in subnet 10.0.0.0/24. So I need: LAN0, LAN1, LAN2 could not see each other. LAN0, LAN1, LAN2 is in same subnet (10.0.0.0/24). All LANs have to get only internet. How can I configure LinuxBR to do so?