Displaying 20 results from an estimated 7000 matches similar to: "Proper way to start multiple icecast services through bash script?"
2017 May 29
5
Proper way to start multiple icecast services through bash script?
Yes, the web players I've tested have a hard time parsing meta properly using only one instance with separate streams. Tested at least 6 of them looking for reliable meta and cross browser/OS compatibility.
On May 29, 2017, at 10:23 AM, Marvin Scholz <epirat07 at gmail.com<mailto:epirat07 at gmail.com>> wrote:
Any specific reason to run 4 Icecasts?
On 29 May 2017, at 16:21,
2017 May 29
0
Proper way to start multiple icecast services through bash script?
try this:
/usr/bin/icecast -c /etc/icecast.xml -b > /dev/null 2>&1 &
as for killing them, don't overcomplicate things, killall icecast -KILL
also, perhaps you don't even need to kill and start them again, try to HUP
them and see if the certificate updates.
On Mon, May 29, 2017 at 5:27 PM, Walter York <walteryork at hotmail.com> wrote:
> Yes, the web players
2017 May 29
0
Proper way to start multiple icecast services through bash script?
Any specific reason to run 4 Icecasts?
On 29 May 2017, at 16:21, Walter York wrote:
> I have 4 instances of icecast running on my server.
>
>
> #Command to start icecast
> /usr/bin/icecast -c /etc/icecast.xml -b &
> /usr/bin/icecast -c /etc/icecast1.xml -b &
> /usr/bin/icecast -c /etc/icecast2.xml -b &
> /usr/bin/icecast -c /etc/icecast3.xml -b &
>
>
2017 May 29
0
Proper way to start multiple icecast services through bash script?
On 29 May 2017, at 16:27, Walter York wrote:
> Yes, the web players I've tested have a hard time parsing meta
> properly using only one instance with separate streams. Tested at
> least 6 of them looking for reliable meta and cross browser/OS
> compatibility.
There is no difference using one or multiple separate instances that I
am aware of. Thats really weird.
> On May
2005 Jun 10
2
icecast1 documentation
Hi guys,
Can anyone point me to some good icecast1 documentation? I looked on the
icecast.org website, but the /docs link only list the icecast2
documentation now and the whole site is void of icecast1 documentation...
Using icecast1 instead of icecast2 because I need on-demand-streaming...
Thanks,
Kelv
2004 Aug 06
4
[Re: icecast2 ??]
Behold, gtgbr@gmx.net hath decreed:
> Aaron Gaudio wrote:
> > the current stable version. Those who are willing to give up the
> > features not yet implemented in icecast2 in order to stream vorbis, can
> > use the devel version. Those who don't need to stream vorbis can
> > continue using the stable version. There is not a good rationality for
>
> Icecast2 is
2004 Aug 06
4
[Re: icecast2 ??]
Behold, Adon Irani <adon@YorkU.CA> hath decreed:
>
> the icecast2 developers be guilt-tripped into repeating icecast's
> performance ?
> _ is it not enough that OGG can have a streaming server that supports it ?
Perhaps, if that is the only requirement to have a fully-functional
streamer. Unfortunately, I believe this is not sufficient for the
user base. So, if the
2004 Oct 19
1
Some metadata missing, relaying icecast1 stream with icecast2
I'm relaying an icecast1 mp3 stream with icecast2. This works fine,
and the song title is displayed correctly no matter if I use
<relay-shoutcast-metadata>1</> or not on the relay.
But, the stream name and other metadata provided by ices0 on the
icecast1 server is not displayed in the listening client.
Icecast1 source:
[Id: 1] [Sock: 11] [Time of connect: 09/Aug/2004:10:01:24]
2004 Aug 06
5
[Re: icecast2 ??]
> The current homepage is http://www.xiph.org/cvs.html ... this is
> supposed to change eventually, but there are some weird problems with
> icecast.org that i don't quite understand. :)
>
> Anyways, do NOT check out icecast2 from icecast.org CVS, it is very
> outdated. Instead, check out the 'icecast' module from anoncvs@xiph.org.
>
> Moritz
Sorry...
2004 Aug 06
2
[Re: icecast2 ??]
Behold, gtgbr@gmx.net hath decreed:
> Aaron Gaudio wrote:
> > If icecast.org is so broken, then someone ought to do what was
> > suggested on the list in November (looking through the archives):
> > put it out of its misery. Why are there no "official" releases?
>
> I already told you, there *are* official releases (or, to be exact, one
> release), but
2004 Aug 06
2
Icecast in Macromedia Flash
Hi Assorgia,
It would be very nice if you could provide a network dump for both versions
of Icecast1 and Icecast2. We could make comparisons of the results and maybe
identify why Flash doesn't work with Icecast2. If you need it, I can help
you by performing the tests on Icecast2/Windows but not on Icecast1 because
I don't have any Linux box for the moment (I only found a version of
2004 Aug 06
3
Missing headers in Icecast2
Hi everybody,
Assorgia and me, we have worked on the Flash client for Icecast2. We got
successful results with:
-Windows (Netscape, Mozilla, CompuServe, or Opera) -Macintosh and
Linux(Netscape, Internet Explorer for Macintosh, Safari, AOL, Opera, or
CompuServe)
For Windows (Internet Explorer or AOL) some headers sent by Icecast2 are
missing. These headers are sent by Icecast1 but NOT Icecast2
2004 Aug 06
2
Server buffer question
Hello,
First at all, thanks for the great program, I'm enjoying so much. :)
I'm adding ogg stream support to my client for Mac OS X. While it
works perfectly with shoutcast and mp3 icecast1, I have buffer
problems with icecast2/ogg/vorbis.
My client, like iTunes (Apple's client - mp3), doesn't pre-bufferize
on the first try. If the connection is fast enough, even a 128KB
2004 Aug 06
3
using the latest icecast and ices to stream both ogg and mp3
I've gotten a request from another broadcasting partner to set up yet
another streaming audio server. They would like to stream in both ogg
and mp3 formats from off a single icecast machine. I have been searching
through the archives and I have seen this mentioned as being possible,
but no real configurations.
I would of course place LAME on the box and use that for streaming just
as I would
2004 Aug 06
2
[Re: icecast2 ??]
Behold, gtgbr@gmx.net hath decreed:
>
> Well, I think saying that Xiph.org doesn't care about its users at all
> is too harsh. On the other hand, there's some truth in this, and I
> highly appreciate it. If you want to stick to MP3, Icecast1 is for you -
> nobody forces you to use it (or not), and you're also free to use
> something else. Xiph.org, i.e. Jack
2004 Aug 06
3
Icecast in Macromedia Flash
Hi Assorgia,
Thanks for the flash animation. I think Icecast1 might be the solution. I am
just a little bit scared by the message "Note that icecast 1 is deprecated
and unsupported, and may possibly induce nausea in small children, hair loss
in men, and estrogen fluctuations in women" that appears on the download
page. I have a nice blond hair of "Principe Azzuro" that I
2017 May 29
0
Proper way to start multiple icecast services through bash script?
Philipp,
I replaced: ps -ef | grep icecast | grep -v grep | awk '{print $2}' | xargs -r kill -9
with: pkill icecast
This works.
I did try "pkill -HUP icecast" but it didn't seem to have intended effect of refreshing certificate.
________________________________
From: Icecast <icecast-bounces at xiph.org> on behalf of Philipp Schafft <lion at
2004 Oct 25
3
Static files with Icecast2
Hello,
With Icecast1 existed the functionality to have the server feed static
content from disk. It generated a playlist file for the one file passed to
it, and off things went.
I googled around a bit and found people saying it was possible to do
this with icecast2, but the one outside link I found was now invalid.
Are there any pointers about how to add static content? Does it work
2004 Aug 06
1
Icecast 2 for Live365 MP3 Relaying
> behavior you are seeing....(that also is a difference between iceast1 and
> icecast2 - no server-side buffering in icecast2 and there was in
> icecast1)...
What do you mean stream buffering? We never buffered in either version
that I remember. If you fall behind, you get kicked. It's always been
that way.
jack.
--- >8 ----
List archives: http://www.xiph.org/archives/
2005 Mar 22
5
Push relay from nicecast with icecast2?
Greetings,
I have some confusion. I've seen it mentioned, somewhere in some docs,
that Icecast2 does not (as yet) support Push relaying. Is this actually
the case? Should I be looking at icecast1 (which does support push
relay, I believe) until such capability is implemented on icecast2? Or
should I be creating a combination of both? Or what?
Here's my situation:
I have a customer