similar to: Can''t get shorewall to start...

Hi Folks! I''m new to shorewall (in the process of switching from Bastille), and I have a question as to how to address using Bluetooth enabled Palms with a BT dongle on a linux box protected by shorewall. Basically I followed the directions located at http://www.metacon.ca/bcs/view.php?page=bluetooth to get things working strictly with iptables, specifically: echo

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 David Macklem wrote: | Tom, | | As I said in a previous mail, these rules file changes work. Thanks. | | However, I''m not sure that your firewall changes to handle the GATEWAY column in the tunnels file does work. I downloaded the most recent STABLE2 release from CVS and replaced my copy of the firewall script with the updated version

hello , i''m currently trying to set-up Traffic Shapping with Shorewall and I have strong feelings that I found a bug. I may be mistaken, but I tried everything and can''t get it to work. I''ve turned ON TC_ENABLED=Yes and CLEAR_TC=Yes when i start shorewall ( shorewall start ), i get this message : Setting up Traffic Control Rules... TC Rule "2 eth1 0.0.0.0/0 tcp

Dear list members, Masquerading does''not work for me. This is a Mandrake Linux 10 system, but I use another kernel, that included in the original distribution (original: 2.6.3, now used 2.6.8 because of a lot of suck with OpenSwan with kernels prior 2.6.4). The problem seems to be similar or identical mentioned here:

Hello everybody, To make all clear; I am newbee in shorewall, but... I''ve tried to connect two computers by Mandrake Connection Sharing facility. (Mandrake 9.1). Briefly, the problem is that after all that auto-configuration activities the network is completely down, just because shorewall. The result of calling `shorewall debug start` by hand is available at the end of the

Hello....I have a specific Requirement on a One Interface Setup...Help me guys 1.Allow ssh,dns and web request to the firewall.....Input Chain ACCEPT net fw tcp 22 ACCEPT net fw udp 53 ACCEPT net fw tcp 80 Are the above rules correct. 2. Allow 6 Pool of Ip''s to be forwarded thru this firewall....This Machine Stands as a gateway for 6

dovecot --version = 1.2.11 dovecot -n: http://pastebin.com/ahCpdC0F I have a user that has no problem viewing email from roundcube (webmail) but Outlook 2010 doesn't seem to download random messages for a day or two, then they suddently show up. I saw the wiki had some suggestions for older versions of Outlook to fix other problems, but I didn't really see anything like this. Any help

Hi, after kernel upgrade to 2.4.23 my existing configuration of shorewal 1.4.8 will not start / it fail on DNAT and/or masq with message: "iptables: Invalid argument" / I founded some similar problems description - see links bellow, but there is no solution how to get work shorewall with DNAT and masq with 2.4.23 kernel. http://www.ussg.iu.edu/hypermail/linux/kernel/0312.0/0268.html

Hi, I ran a linear regression on a data set and got an Rsq of about .27. The plot looks as though an exponential curve would be a better fit. What codes do I use to do this? Thank you, Ryan Munroe [[alternative HTML version deleted]]

Kristoffer R. Munroe wrote: > <ices:Password>hackme</ices:Password> > DEBUG: Mount: /mymp3stream, Password: letmein Are these not significant? -- Tim Schuh Ugly Networks --- >8 ---- List archives: http://www.xiph.org/archives/ icecast project homepage: http://www.icecast.org/ To unsubscribe from this list, send a message to

Hi, I''m trying to enable ssh (when that works, want to add:pop3s,smtp,web) from the internet to the firewall but it does not work. I managed to DNAT ftp to a host in the loc network (192.168.0.50) successful but I don''t know why SSH: Does not work for me: ACCEPT net fw tcp 22 Works from the loc network: ACCEPT loc fw tcp 22 I have tried also with (no success): AllowSSH

On 9/13/17 10:31 AM, Peter Bergner via llvm-dev wrote: > On 9/12/17 8:15 PM, Bill Seurer via llvm-dev wrote: >> I updated one of my powerpc64le llvm test systems to Fedora 25 and I >> started getting a whole bunch of sanitizer test case failures.  I tried >> testing some earlier revisions on the new OS that had worked fine under >> the old but they generate the same

On Thursday, 15 April 2004 at 08:07, Kristoffer R. Munroe wrote: > I am using the http protocol now and I still get the same results. <snip> > >DEBUG: Sending following information to libshout: > >DEBUG: Stream: 0 > >DEBUG: Host: 127.0.0.1:8000 (protocol: xaudiocast) According to the log file you attached, you're still using xaudiocast. Double check your

Hi I have recently reconfigured my system to a Bridge based architecture on the basis that I have an ADSL Modem/Router with a Public address on the Wan side and a Private address on the Lan side. I am running a Debian based system kernel 2.6.7 and the Bridging software is installed and working correctly, including startup etc. The problem that I have is in "shorewall start" The

i ask here after give up reading and following all the documentation.. i got 3 nic eth0:222.222.222.222 netmask:255.255.255.252 gateway:222.222.222.221 eth1:10.10.10.254 netmask:255.255.255.0 gateway:blank eth2:10.10.11.254 netmask:255.255.255.0 gateway: blank i''m running redhat9, and shorewall2.2.2 eth0 connected to dsl modem ( static ip ) eth1 connected to d-link router ( for

On Thu, 15 Apr 2004, Kristoffer R. Munroe wrote: > I see that I don't understand why it is still using the xaudiocast protocol <SNIP> > [root@wyatt icecast]# ices -m mymp3stream -c ices.conf > Unknown Node: Server > Unknown Execution keyword: Base_Directory hmmm. Just before we go any further, are you using Ices 0.3 with libshout 2.0? Older versions will not work with

Hi Tom and other gurus, I modified SHOREWALL (version 2.0.15) for bridging and I cannot restart it. I got the following error ... Processing /etc/shorewall/policy... Policy ACCEPT for fw to net using chain fw2net Policy REJECT for fw to loc using chain all2all Policy DROP for net to fw using chain net2all Policy ACCEPT for loc to fw using chain loc2fw Policy ACCEPT for loc to net

Hi, I have a working test install of Shorewall 2.0.7 on a 32 bit install of Gentoo, it''s working like a champ, so i am making an install on a nice new Opteron server, using 64bit Gentoo. I have run into a problem which going by your FAQ might be due to a missing module, but after a couple of hours of fiddling I''m stumpted - I can''t see any options in the 2.6.8 kernel

Hi, I''ve attached a patch which fixes a logging problem with log_rule_limit in custom actions. E.g. this action: ,----[ Whitelist ] | if [ -n "$LEVEL" ]; then | run_iptables -N ${CHAIN}Add | log_rule_limit $LEVEL ${CHAIN}Add WhitelistAdd DROP "$LOG_LIMIT" $TAG | run_iptables -A ${CHAIN}Add -j DROP | run_iptables -N ${CHAIN}Del | log_rule_limit

hi, Please see the following text diagram: 10.0.15.0/24 --> 10.0.15.1 (f0/1) cisco router (f0/0) 192.168.0.5 <-- 192.168.0.0/24 --> 192.168.0.1 firewall --> internet I have some problem after added a static route in shorewall in /etc/sysconfig/network-scripts/route-eth0, the syntax is: 10.0.15.0/24 via 192.168.0.5 in 192.168.0.0/24 computers cannot ping or