similar to: multiple vpn connections out via shorewall

Hi All, I am going through a setup of a test samba3 box with rh9 with my self rolled copy of 3.0.10. I have removed the old rpm version of samba. I compiled 3.0.10 with all defaults except for the install prefix which I set to /usr/local/samba3. I followed the steps given in Chap 6 - making users happy in the online html version. I changed a few things. Instead of MASSIVE as the PDC name I

https://bugzilla.netfilter.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=40 ------- Additional Comments From netfilter@linuxace.com 2004-12-30 20:16 MET ------- Any further word on this? Bug report is getting stale... -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.netfilter.org/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching

Hello, We can't connect to our pptp server through our CentOS gateway with a XP client. The linux client is working but not the XP client. I know for a fact that the pptp server is not the problem because if I connect the XP machine directly to the Internet the pptp vpn is working. I know about the pptp-conntrack-nat patch, I compiled the 2.4.9 kernel, with patch-o-matic-ng-20060511.tar.bz2

I am not sure if this is a windows problem or a Samba problem. We have a network consisting of a mixture of Samba and windows servers running under a windows PDC. The network is a WAN with radio (802.11B) point-to-point links between buildings within the campus, and frame relay and ADSL links to interstate offices. The interstate offices have windows BDC's. Most of the desktops are win2k

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 I have a situation where some Poptop/PPTP sessions (only with FC5/Shorewall to FC5/Shorewall firewall in between) cause the following to appear in the state table (shorewall show connections). unknown 47 420 src=XX.234.79.183 dst=XX.234.137.226 packets=2 bytes=130 [UNREPLIED] src=XX.234.137.226 dst=XX.234.79.183 packets=0 bytes=0 mark=0 use=1

--KMIs29sPfC/9Gbii Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Good news, Everyone! (TM) The netfilter core team announces a new release of the netfilter patch-o-matic suite: patch-o-matic-20030107 This release contains the most up-to-date bugfixes and new features for=20 the netfilter/iptables subsystem of the 2.4.x Linux

--BU7+kJFeeDlNltZg Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Good news, Everyone! (TM) The netfilter core team announces a new release of the netfilter patch-o-matic suite: patch-o-matic-20030912 This release contains the most up-to-date bugfixes and new features for=20 the netfilter/iptables subsystem of the 2.4.x Linux

Hi All, I have a modified RH 9 box running as a PDC with roaming profiles and home shares. We really need to upgrade this system to 3.0.9 PDC with LDAP. If it all falls apart on the upgrade I'd like to be able to go back to 2.2.12 at the toss of a hat. Are there any files other than my /usr/local/samba2 directory and the tdb files that live in /var somewhere. I have LDAP almost ready to

Hi All! A feww weeks ago I upgraded one of my customers from 2.2.7a to 2.2.12. I chose the download and compile for 2.2.12 so that I had full control over what was going on and where the new version would live. This went very well until I found missing bits and pieces like smbpasswd etc etc. They live in new places on 12! I could quite happily swap between the two versions by killing the smbd

Trying again, after re-subscribing: On 11/20/06, Bob Beers <bob.beers@gmail.com> wrote: > Hello, > > I want to dynamically create DNAT rules for > RTP streams (port-mapping for a SIP proxy). > > If my proxy adds the rule before the first packet > of the RTP stream hits the port, all is well. But, if > the stream begins arriving before my rule is in > place,

https://bugzilla.netfilter.org/cgi-bin/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=40 ------- Additional Comments From pmccurdy@net-itech.com 2004-08-04 06:06 ------- We have managed to replicate this bug in-house. It seems to happen to us when we have a machine acting as a NAT router that we saturate with outgoing UDP packets; we use hping2 to generate them from a workstation connected via 100 Mbit

Hello I''ve setuped a bridge with l7-filter and ipp2p. We have every day + or - between 10Mbits and 30 Mbits P2P traffic from + or - 450 customers. When traffic increase. I''ve got this kind of error message : Feb 23 14:26:19 gestor1 kernel: printk: 38 messages suppressed. Feb 23 14:26:19 gestor1 kernel: ip_conntrack: table full, dropping packet. The server is celeron

shorewall version 2.0.7 1: lo: <LOOPBACK,UP> mtu 16436 qdisc noqueue link/loopback 00:00:00:00:00:00 brd 00:00:00:00:00:00 inet 127.0.0.1/8 scope host lo 2: eth0: <BROADCAST,MULTICAST,NOTRAILERS,UP> mtu 1500 qdisc pfifo_fast qlen 1000 link/ether 00:30:48:53:25:b2 brd ff:ff:ff:ff:ff:ff inet 81.169.188.152/32 brd 81.169.188.152 scope global eth0 3: eth1:

https://bugzilla.netfilter.org/cgi-bin/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59 laforge@netfilter.org changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching

I am working on a split route and ShoreWall system. I reviewed the lartc documentation but have a few areas that I still need help on. Here is my network: 64.xxx.xxx.1/25 66.xxx.xxx.129/26 | | ################################################# # Eth2 64.xxx.xxx.2 eth0 66.xxx.xxx.130 # #

I just recompiled a plain vanilla 2.4.28 kernel, and used the Shorewall.net kernel config as a guideline. For some reason, I get this: Nov 30 12:05:34 fw shorewall: Shorewall has detected the following iptables/netfilter capabilities: Nov 30 12:05:34 fw shorewall: NAT: Available Nov 30 12:05:34 fw shorewall: Packet Mangling: Available Nov 30 12:05:34 fw shorewall: Multi-port Match:

I recently implemented v2.0.9 using ''shorewall setup guide'' 2004-07-31. Starting with block everything not known to be in use and opening ports as complaints come in. This has led to a few rule changes. After a rule change I use shorewall restart to reload the rules. Seems to work OK... except for an outbound NAT SMTP connection from a mail server on .122 to postini.com. The

Hi, I''m having problems with this configuration: iptables 1.3.7 (vanilla or repackaged for fc5) kernel 2.6.19 (vanilla) ROUTE 1.11 (last pom-ng) layer7-filter 2.6 (last in sf.net) connlimit (last pom-ng) When I try to use -j ROUTE in any chain in mangle table I have this error: [root@myhost ~]# iptables -v -t mangle -A POSTROUTING -p tcp --dport msnp -j ROUTE --gw

Hi! This is the weirdest problem I have found for a long time! Using nut-2.0.5 and a Gentoo powered HP Proliant ML350 I setup the config files just the same as I always do and tried to get the megatec driver chatting to the UPS. It worked fine on a Windoze server with Upsilon2000 so I have a bit of confidence in cable etc! When I ran upsc after starting upsd to complained about stale data! Most

Rowland, dont be to hard on the guy.. ;-) Sorry that i cant help out more atm but im in process of win7 to win 10 testing with samba, and mainwhile doing a rollout.. :-/ Here are some working examples on debian jessie.. with samba 4.1.7 debian. an apache2.4 kerberos auth example. AuthType Kerberos AuthName "Website Login" KrbMethodNegotiate On KrbMethodK5Passwd