similar to: Large Amount of Listeners

Ron Blok wrote: > Hi fellow icecast users, > > I get more an d more complaints from listeners who are trying to listen to > our stream behind a firewall. > It seams that more and more companies block port 8000 in their firewalls. > > Is there a solution for these cases ? I have somewhere read something about > streaming on port 80 instead of 8000. > Is this the

Hi, I know two solutions for that. 1. You set up icecast to broadcast on the 80 port (there's a <port> tag in the xml). If you run a webserver on the same machine, then you can't do this. 2. If you run a webserver on the 80 port, you can set up the webserver to relay the stream through it. If you use apache, you need something like this in your httpd.conf: <VirtualHost

_+icecast@sucs.org wrote: > Ices, Darkice, most of the normal stream creation bits don't need X11 > Do you mean normalisation? I mean dynamic compression. > WMA is Microsoft only so you will probably need to use Microsoft > software to do this. > > But if you already have MP3 I realy don't see the reason for WMA, as > anything that plays WMA is likely to also

Hi All, I have two questions. I have an icecast2 server installed, and I need to set up a Linux-based computer that sends a church's programs to the icecast server. (Both worship and teaching.) What application do you suggest? It would be really pleasing if I wouldn't need X11 to use the software, and it would display (with charactergraphics) the current signal level. The signal

Hello, I'm looking for a method to track stream performance problems, I mean : why does listeners got buffering ? We are using two "front relay" that are hosted by differents providers. The front relays are connected to our main server (which encode) that is using two ADSL connections from two differents providers. How can I do to know if there is a problem between "Front relay

Hi J, >Hi David, >Do you know of a flash player that works for icecast and IE7? Whilst I've never used the software myself I came across Wimpy via the Icecast forum: http://forum.icecast.org/viewtopic.php?p=2822& You may want to give it a try. >j Regards, David >-----Original Message----- >From: icecast-bounces@xiph.org [mailto:icecast-bounces@xiph.org] On Behalf

Hi, I'm looking to stream a large amount of conncurrent connects and want to use icecast probably on a CentOS base. The bandwidth requirements are over 60 Mbps before any overheads, I'm looking at using some Dell SC1425 machines but am not sure how many I'd need, I'd appreciated hearing your experiences and suggestions. I need to be able to stream the following simultaneous

Hi Chip, >hi david >> Hi, >> >> I'm looking to stream a large amount of conncurrent connects and want to >> use icecast probably on a CentOS base. The bandwidth requirements are over >> 60 Mbps before any overheads, I'm looking at using some Dell SC1425 machines >> but am not sure how many I'd need, I'd appreciated hearing your experiences

Thanks for the advice! After I have managed to install all needed libs under Suse 9.2 everything works just fine. But now I have a new problem. I need to install icecast2 under Debian 3 and the Debian package Server seems to be down constant. Where can I get the icecast2 install package for Debian besides from the Debian Server? Can anyone name me a location on the web? THX Tobi

i'm building a new server for icecast broadcast and web hosting ..likely a media library for local artists / producers , etc. . i haven't been able to decide what processor architecture to use for the system . i definately favour performance over value/cost .. any suggestions on whether p4, amd, amd64, or something else would best serve the purpose ? ( i run icecast on debian linux btw

Does anyone have a Perl or PHP Icecast2 Status Page Parser? Thanks. -greg. __________________________________________________________________________ Greg J. Ogonowski VP Product Development ORBAN / CRL, Inc. 1525 Alvarado St. San Leandro, CA 94577 USA TEL +1 510 351-3500 FAX +1 510 351-0500 greg@orban.com http://www.orban.com

<!-- @page { size: 8.5in 11in; margin: 0.79in } P { margin-bottom: 0.08in } --> Dear Mr./Mrs. I use Linux Fedora 8 and I tried to install your software for p2p broadcasting. There were some problems. 1. I install successfully icecast-2.3.1-0.src.rpm (rpm -ivh icecast-2.3.1-0.src.rpm) 2.When I tried to install libxml2 from http://xmlsoft.org/downloads.html I receive this output:

hello Another beginners question..... I've been googling through the icecast archives looking for information on how icecast handles multiple clients. Haven't been able to find what I'm looking for. Could someone please explain (or direct me to links) what happens to the upload bandwidth of a box running icecast, when more than one client connects? For example, if a box on a 128kbps

I am wondering if anyone has a working install of oh323 on fedora Core2. An replies would be appreciated as we need this urgently. Seshu Kanuri -----Original Message----- From: asterisk-users-admin@lists.digium.com [mailto:asterisk-users-admin@lists.digium.com]On Behalf Of steve@nexusuk.org Sent: Thursday, July 22, 2004 6:12 AM To: asterisk-users@lists.digium.com Subject: Re: [Asterisk-Users]

On 17 Dec 2010, at 03:15, Michael Spencer wrote: > As long as EFI C isn't radically different from normal C, I would > suggest adding a EBC target to LLVM first. Otherwise you have no way > to test the clang modifications. As was stated in the last post on this subject, EFI C has integer types that have a size determined at run time. I can't see how this would be integrated

Hi Folks, I am breaking my head for compiling asterisk-oh323 properly on my asterisk box from past 1 week. But still after my all efforts, I unable to make it compile properly, My box is Fedora core 2 with asterisk-0.9.0. I was trying for following configuration with openh323 and pwlib. Openh323 and pwlib are installed properly. But problem is asterisk-oh323. asterisk-oh323-0.6.2a.tar.gz

On Thu, Dec 16, 2010 at 5:42 PM, Lu Mitnick <king19880326 at gmail.com> wrote: > Hello all, > > I want to the do followings: > > (1) Modify the LLVM front-end(clang) to support EFI C > > (2) Add EFI Byte Code target to LLVM > > I am wondering to know which task should I do first, modify front end or > porting LLVM? > > thanks > > yi-hong As long as

I have no analog line interfaces on my asterisk system, but I do have two UK 0870 numbers routed to two separate VoIP accounts (one with FWD, one with gossiptel). Asterisk is configured to register with these accounts. I get voice calls through just fine this way. I thought I could get one of these 0870 numbers to route through to rxfax, thus allowing folks to fax me directly. I've set up

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 I'm experiencing frequent kernel panics when using the X100P card under the 2.6.6 Fedora kernel. I've attached the kernel output to this message - - it looks like the IRQ stack is overflowing and trashing some memory, causing a series of oopses followed by a complete crash. I have just hacked the kernel to reenable 8k stacks and will see

Hi All, We're seeing an issue with LDAP auth when the username contains a - char. We're using 1.0.15 as packaged for Debian Lenny Oct 2 12:29:02 silver dovecot: auth(default): LDAP: binding failed (dn (none)): Protocol error Oct 2 12:29:03 silver dovecot: imap-login: Aborted login (1 authentication attempts): user=<sci-fi at sucs.org>, method=PLAIN, rip=::ffff:127.0.0.1,