similar to: Legal issues for non-profit radio stations.

Of course we all know these groups would certainly not appreciate the audible distrobution of their bread and butter. However, I assume your scope is only within the U.S. , whereas personaly in Canada. Our laws governed a right to freedom of information in regards to online content. More or less, if you find it online it must be public content (unless that's been changed by now, I haven't

hi Michael Hobbs wrote: > Hi All, > > Some time ago I emailed this list and mentioned (as well as a couple of > techinical queries) that I was trying to contact the PRS for information > on the copyright licencing requirements of a non-profit on-line radio > station, a few people expressed interest in this and asked I keep them > updated. Well I just sent my third email

chip wrote: > hi > > we were are talking about the situation in the UK. > > more info about all this here for UK folks: > > http://www.mcps-prs-alliance.co.uk/ > http://www.ppluk.com/ > > the Community Media Association is currently lobbying for a blanket > license agreement for UK webcasters: > > http://www.commedia.org.uk/ > > cheers > >

Hi All, I'm planning to get a stream running in the next month or two, and will be using ices and icecast. Legality: Further to the last couple of posts regarding legality issue. I notice that the PRC do their licence cost on a percentage of your revenue, seeing as I plan to host no adverts or indeed any commercial aspect I hope to get a licence without actually paying anything. (I've

Hi! anybody knows where can i find some info about the legality of do a streaming of copyrighted music? can i make a audio stream with my legaly-brought music from my home to listen into my workplace? can i open it to the world? what are the legal terms that applies the thousands of internet radio broadcasts that exists on the net? if anybody knows the answers, or where i can find it, i will be

Hi all Speexers, I've done some optimization to current SVN fixed-point on ARM9E platform. If the RVDS simulator gives the MCPS(Million Cycle Per Second) value A, then actual MCPS on real CPU will be around 2*A. I don't know what cause the big gap between the simulator and real CPU. What do you think? BR, Lianghu -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was

Does anyone have an (overhead) paging system that they like that works with SIP? We've got a client with an old paging system that (supposedly) just takes an rj11 POTS connection, but when we put an SPA Cisco adapter on it, it doesn't auto-answer the call, so paging never happens. [cid:image001.png at 01D4DFF6.9C1F1AA0] Michael J. Munger, dCAP, MCPS, MCNPS, MBSS Microsoft Certified

Hi, all, I am porting speex on ARM7TDMI, I have done some optimization, the result is that the encoder and decoder need about 60 MCPS for 5.96kbps bitrate and complexity 0. Can someone give me informtion about Speex optimization on ARM7? Another question, my ADC and DAC are 12 bits, but Speex codec is 16bits, Did someone try to modify speex to 12 bits? I think if I modify speex to 12 bits, the

*Problem I want to solve:* We have 3 sites: A, B, and C. Network admins should have access to all three. (this works as-is). Desktop support should only have access to their site. (Tech A to site A, Tech B to site B, Tech C to site C). *How I think I can do it:* Working with keys? Admin's public key will be on all the client machines, and thus, the client machines will always

Hi, I had this doubt in relation to MCPS calculation for tremor: 1. How to calculate MCPS for each decode? I am using this formula is this right? MCPS= (cycles * channels * bytes/sample)/(outbytes * 1M) Where cycles are for one decode. And eg: Channels = 2, byte/sample =2 and outbytes = 4096 Is this equation right? 2. I observed that while decoding the

Michael Hobbs wrote: > Legality: > Further to the last couple of posts regarding legality issue. I notice > that the PRC do their licence cost on a percentage of your revenue, > seeing as I plan to host no adverts or indeed any commercial aspect I > hope to get a licence without actually paying anything. (I've sent > them an inoccous email so we'll see what they say) Do

You need more than an ATA. You need something with an FSO and FXO. I've used Linksys/SPA3102-3.3.6 and been happy with it. From: asterisk-users <asterisk-users-bounces at lists.digium.com> On Behalf Of Sebastian Nielsen Sent: Thursday, March 21, 2019 3:01 PM To: 'Asterisk Users Mailing List - Non-Commercial Discussion' <asterisk-users at lists.digium.com> Subject: Re:

Thanks Michael, I will proceed like this. I think I didn't have UDP 655 forwarded on the remote server, will do that (had it at my client's router). If tinc connects, will both server and client see each other, for example I will be able to access all webui's running on SERVER from CLIENT side? For example, SERVER is running webui of Tvheadend on 192.168.0.4:9981 How can I access that

Hello All, We have been doing an optimised port of OPUS to a ARM Cortex A9. We are currently measuring between 20 and 90 MCPS for our code running on a Panda board (single core), this covers all bit-rates,sample rates for stereo coding (encode + decode) under normal operation. As Marc says complexity can be controlled via the API with our higher figure corresponding to the default setting of

Hello Tom, I seem to be missing the big picture here.. can you shed some light? I have a three interface setup loc,dmz, net I have 4 global addresses that I want to attach to eth0 (net) address 1 - fw address address 2- I want to forward to a (loc)router that uses dynamic dns vpn (gre) (Yamaha router) address 3 - web server/Bind9 (dmz)forward port 80,443,53 address 4 - mail server (dmz)pop3,

Still not working I really have to change 21 port on 80 port, my friend has only www and mail on his netwok. He has rigorous admin. I have done : !! in proftpd.cof : # Port 21 is the standard FTP port. Port 80 !! in /etc/shorewall/modules: loadmodule ip_conntrack_ftp ports=21,80 loadmodule ip_nat_ftp ports=21,80 AFTER THAT AND RESTARTTING PROFTP AND

There is already 10 PRs sent to GitHub repo. But they all are useless, in every PR people are being informed that they should send patches to http://reviews.llvm.org/

Hello LLVM-Dev, The other day as I was digging through lldb’s test suite I noticed they support something kinda neat. In their python test harness, the attribute they use to denote expected failures supports a parameter for specifying the bug number. This got me thinking. I believe that any test that is marked XFAIL is a bug, and we can use LIT to enforce that. So I wrote a patch

Hi, I know there has been significant discussion about "moving" from Phabricator to GitHub reviews and pull requests, etc. I'm not suggesting that we do anything in terms of global LLVM policy. However, as a maintainer of libc++, I commit __a lot__ of other people's code for them. It would be a huge time saver for me if I could nicely suggest to contributors (not force them) to

Just today I received a weird e-mail that contained a worm (WORM_GREW.A) attached to it. From : Vinoth Kumar <vinoth@vinjey.com> Sent : Tuesday, January 17, 2006 6:29 PM To : <ivo_mmm@hotmail.com> Subject : Fw: Funny :) Attachment : Attachments001.BHX (0.13 MB) MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: from vinoth ([59.144.59.103]) by bay0-mc4-f5.bay0.hotmail.com with Microsoft