similar to: Sizing an Ice Cast Server

How do people feel about eliminating the list serv in favor of the forum? Or limiting the list serv to news? I have one vendor I work with that has a knowledgebase, a forum, and two mailing lists - with much overlap of topics. It is truly enough to drive you totally crazy. I'm not suggesting anything. Just bringing it up. Geoff

There are some rather nice archive replacements for Mailman that provide full searching, etc. I can provide more info if wanted. Geoff

I'm curious about why you would want to run Icecast on port 80. Geoff Justin Bot wrote: >Care to shed some light on this? I have about 10 IPs that are at my >disposal and 3 I've been keeping for spares and whatnot. Though >binding them is a little beyond me. > >TIA > >Justin > >On 6/22/05, Klaas Jan Wierenga <k.j.wierenga@home.nl> wrote: > >

Hi all. so, I don?t know if anyone of you has played with -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: KoalaSAN Broadcaster.zip Type: application/zip Size: 1408 bytes Desc: not available Url : http://lists.xiph.org/pipermail/icecast/attachments/20140310/61e9c81e/attachment.zip -------------- next part -------------- but if you all have, do you know how I

Hello, I'm testing a two nodes glusterfs distributed cluster (version 3.3.1-1) on Debian 7. The two nodes write on the same iscsi volume on a SAN. When I try to write an 1G file with dd, I have the following results : NFS : 107 Mbytes/s Gluster client : 8 Mbytes/sec My /etc/fstab on the client : /etc/glusterfs/cms.vol /data/cms glusterfs defaults 0 0 I'd like to use the gluster

Dear best guys, I really love 5.3 in many ways but here're some unbelievable transfer rates, after I went out and bought a pair of Intel GigaBit Ethernet Cards to solve my performance problem (*laugh*): (In short, see *** below) Tests were done with two Intel GigaBit Ethernet cards (82547EI, 32bit PCI Desktop adapter MT) connected directly without a switch/hub and "device

We are switching from Windows Media to Icecast. I want to get as close to open source as possible. That means that I need the following open-source items: Player for Windows (not Winamp if possible - it's now owned by AOL.) Player for Mac Player for Linux We will also be podcasting, so that means our encoding needs to be compatible with the Apple iPod. Here's what it supports: MP3

I have a Dell server with four bonded, gigabit interfaces. Bonding mode is 802.3ad, xmit_hash_policy=layer3+4. When testing this setup with iperf, I never get more than a total of about 3Gbps throughput. Is there anything to tweak to get better throughput? Or am I running into other limits (e.g. was reading about tcp retransmit limits for mode 0). The iperf test was run with iperf -s on the

I hope I'm in the right place for this question. I am in the process of creating a large scale production fileserver architecture for the purpose of serving very large files (~4.5GB) to a small number of clients (~200). My assumptions to this point have been that my throughput would be constrained by hardware and not software, but I would like some validation of this thinking. I am hoping

Hi I was wondering if you ever got better performance out of your Gigabit/IDE/Fc2? I am facing a similar situation. I am running FC2 with Samba 3.x My problem lies in not that I am limited to 10 MBytes per second sustained. I think it's related to this pdflush and how it's buffers are setup. (I have been doing some research and before 2.6 kernels bdflush was the method that was used and

I did some testing using samba-3.0.0 as a server and two identical clients one Running W2K and other running Win XP pro. If I write a big file using the W2K client, I'm getting about 25 Mbytes/sec but if I run the same testing using the Win XP Pro, this client only is able to get 12.5 Mbytes/sec. There is a problem between XP and samba?

Hi all, I am trying to get some decent speed out of a vanilla Debian (Proxmox) box and am running out of ideas. Basically I can exchange data at 110MB/sec (raw, nfs, ftp) but not with Samba shares. I tried almost every samba tuning tip I could find to no avail. The only optimisation left to smb.conf at the moment is debug level = 0. As one can see the robocopy throughput is merely half of what

Greeting All I am using Filebench benchmark in an "Interactive mode" to test ZFS performance with randomread wordload. My Filebench setting & run results are as follwos ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ filebench> set $filesize=5g filebench> set $dir=/hdd/fs32k filebench> set $iosize=32k filebench> set

Currently I''m trying to figure out the best zfs layout for a thumper wrt. to read AND write performance. I did some simple mkfile 512G tests and found out, that per average ~ 500 MB/s seems to be the maximum on can reach (tried initial default setup, all 46 HDDs as R0, etc.). According to http://www.amd.com/us-en/assets/content_type/DownloadableAssets/ArchitectureWP_062806.pdf I would

Hi as soon as someone tells ime I know I should have known icecast steams but there is the other part that you can set-up a play list and it automatically runs through things and this is called.... ice2 ??? and do you download this from icecast.org ?? PS should have known want the act rec was on win amp that's for that :-) silly me AJB --- >8 ---- List archives:

Hi: I use rsync to transfer multiple files from several clients to a server in parallel. I am wondering how many concurrent connections the server should handle to maximize the throughput (number of bytes written to server). In an extreme case, if only one connection allowed, the disk IO speed of server will not be fully utilized. On the other hand, if the server allows too many connections, the

Has anyone worked with either the Hitachi or Seagate Compact flash drives in an IDE to CF interface and set the up with EXT3 formatted partitions for use with LVM? I ASSuME that LVM is not for FAT32 formatted drives.

I''m trying to get maybe 200 MB/sec over NFS for large movie files (need large capacity to hold all of them). Are there any rules of thumb on how much RAM is needed to handle this (probably RAIDZ for all the disks) with zfs, and how large a server should be used? The throughput required is not so large, so I am thinking an X4100 M2 or X4150 should be plenty. This message posted from

When you set up phpBB, the admin can specify defaults. They include "Make email address private" and "Allow members to receive private messages" The admin would set they defaults to "yes" and "no" respectively. That means the member would have to take an action (change a setting in his profile or on an individual post) for his email address to be

Samba digest 1966, Jeremy Allison wrote: > For people who are looking for some objective > numbers to help recommend Samba to their employers (I > know there are some of you on this list :-) you might > want to look at the following couple of articles. > > The first one is in Smart Reseller (a USA trade press > magazine) at : > >