similar to: RealServer and Icecast

I'm running Icecast 2.2.0 on a Windows 2000 server. I'm using Winamp with the SAM encoder plugin to stream an Ogg Vorbis stream (-0.55 quality stereo) from a remote machine. I'm having two problems. 1. The latest Winamp works great. Whamb on OSX works also (but no Title/Artist info shows up). But on other players (Zinf and Audion [OS9 and OSX]) it works great for one song. At song

Thanks. I tried changing Hostname to 69.20.57.94 but the same thing is happening. I have a free IP Address. Is there a way to bid Icecast2 to an IP Address? -- Michael LaBash -------------------- New Possibilities Design http://www.babylabash.com Lavapen.com illustration http://www.lavapen Listen to Love Underground Visionary Revolution (LUVeR) http://www.luver.com Listen to LUVeR Alternative

I noticed in the Docs there is a <bind-address> option but the example given says it limits to just one listener. Is it possible to bind to an IP address but with no listener limit? Or am I just being a dumbkopf.... Would that help my links work? -- Michael LaBash -------------------- New Possibilities Design http://www.babylabash.com Lavapen.com illustration http://www.lavapen Listen

I'm just getting started here and I'm wondering what the best way to do things are. I have been thinking of setting up icecast on my server and then remotely broadcasting with Foobar2000 and the Oddsock plg-in. I'll be playing 128kbps MP3 files. I'm not sure what format to stream in ... I'm having trouble listening to any Ogg Vorbis streams at all .... the MP3 streams come

I have successfully installed Icecast 2 on my server and I am using Foobar2000 with Oddsock on a remote machine. It works great on iTunes with the name of song and artist showing up. But on the Windows Media player, my stream name shows up as the song. RealPlayer on Windows has all sorts of trouble ... works on OSX though (but I don't really care about RealPlayer for this stream) .....

On Wed, 2003-09-03 at 21:58, Erlend Simonsen wrote: > Hirendra Hindocha <hiren_hindocha@comcast.net> writes: > >> > >> > >> No. icecast2 is a streaming server, so it... streams. > >> > > > > Good point. I wonder how the other servers (Real Server ,Quicktime etc) do it. > > Any inputs on any other streaming servers that lets a

Every time I touch something, pieces fall off! It's a good thing this stuff isn't in production yet (for me I mean). So I had an LVS, configured with Piranha, directing http test transactions across two servers. I used Piranha to add another realserver. It appeared in the lvs.cf file, but didn't appear in the ipvsadm output. So I stopped and restarted Pulse. And now *none* of the

After reading through an older thread on this list (streaming ogg audio), I was wondering if would be possible in the future to use OggVorbis and Icecast as a replacement for RealAudio and RealServer. By this I'm not talking about simple live http/tcp streaming, but on-demand rtsp/udp streaming where a user could open a player and instantly jump to a location in a file, or click a link in a

They don't care what serves it - Icecast is legally equivalent to Realserver. -----Original Message----- From: Maarten Stolte To: icecast@xiph.org Sent: 1/15/2002 3:10 AM Subject: [icecast] Record companies etc. and their view of Icecast. Hello, we've been testing Icecast2 with a jukebox like application, and I am wondering how recording companies view these streams. We already have

Hello, I''m used to using Xen in a bridge mode where my dom0 and all domUs are on the same layer 2 network. However now I have to set up a server whose eth0 is on one network and the domUs will be on another /29. So, for example, if the eth0 of dom0 is 192.168.1.214/24, then I have 10.1.1.0/29 (10.1.1.0 -> 10.1.1.7) routed to it for use in domUs, how would I go about setting that up?

> Given my experience of running multiple streams on an > old 486, I'd say you will run out of bandwidth before you > overpower the server. Bandwidth is indeed the biggest resources. We used dual CPU p3-600's at icast. We had 4 machines and we built it to easily handle 12,000 listeners over 500 streams. Only 3 were active at any one time ( the 4th was failover ). CPU load

Hi all, When try to move a local route (for an ip addr configured locally) to a different route table from the local one I can no longer ping the address. My suspicion is that the local (0) table is "special" and used directly without regard for the rules in some circumstances, but I''d like to confirm that what I''m trying to do isn''t possible before giving up!

Rob Burris wrote: > Real Networks offers a free streamer called Real Server. I'm not sure of the > exact link, but here's a starting point That is definitely not free, it's not even zero cost after that evaluation year. There don't even exist any players for it except from Real ... i can't think of anything less free than that. :| I suggest ditching all that crap and to

Hello, I suggest Darwin Steraming Server. Apple's Darwin Streaming Video Server is pretty good and open source...(It uses RTSP protocol and supports Linux,Mac,Windows) RealServer is not free(there is connection and year limitations....) but powerfull..(uses RTSP, supports Linux, Windows[memory eater :)) ]) Also there is Windows Media(uses HTTP(performance is very bad), supports only

You know winamp does support seeking on HTTP connections via the Range: header, of course it relies on the client figuring out how the byte offset corresponds to the time offset, which is easy for CBR files, but not for VBR files. And winamp sometimes gets confused with some streaming servers and keeps trying to seek when it doesn't need to. <p>> > No, they do it using RTSP

On 8 Mar 2004 at 14:30, Rakotomandimby Mihamina wrote: > On Tuesday 02 March 2004 02:23, Michael Smith wrote: > > Shoutcast just does user-agent sniffing. This makes it look like you > > can't download the stream easily, but that's just misleading you - > > it's completely trivial to do so. > > Yes , i'd say the same. > > > > The most clean

Hello, Sorry but in the mails I have read I did not see any "shout" program comments. I have configured icecast and I am using "shout" to encode MP3s. Is the performance of shout bad or others are better then "shout"? I did not encounter any problems yet. Thank you for any comment. Tamer Demir At 12:10 15.01.2002 +0100, Maarten Stolte wrote: >Hello, >

On Wed, Sep 03, 2003 at 12:16:53PM +1000, Michael Smith wrote: > On Wednesday 03 September 2003 04:35, Hirendra Hindocha wrote: > > Hello, > > > > I have an icecast2 server streaming some mp3 files and am using > > winamp to listen to the stream, however I couldn't figure out if > > there is a way to seek or rewind. Is there a way to seek/fast > >

I've been testing DFS roots and I'm finding that while Vista and 2008 Server clients can connect with no problems, Windows XP Pro and 2003 Server clients fail. This seems like it's the wrong way round - Samba usually has more difficulties with recent Windows versions than older ones - but I can only assume that there's some registry/policy change between the versions. If anybody

On Tuesday 02 March 2004 02:23, Michael Smith wrote: > Shoutcast just does user-agent sniffing. This makes it look like you can't > download the stream easily, but that's just misleading you - it's > completely trivial to do so. Yes , i'd say the same . > > The most clean solution in my eyes would be to implement mms:// or > > rtp:// for mp3/ogg-streams in