similar to: High CPU load

Displaying 20 results from an estimated 10000 matches similar to: "High CPU load"

2004 Aug 06
2
High CPU load
I am running Icecast2 and Ices2 on Redhat Linux 9. I have two ices running with two different configuration sending to Icecast and the cpu load for each is around 7.0. The playlist contains ogg files encoded using Ogg Encoder Decoder 1.2.8b from (www.mediatwins.com) with 64kbps, 44.1KHz, VBR. The <encode> </encode> is the same for both configurations and here it is:
2004 Aug 06
3
No sound (ices-2.0.0, RH9)
* Enrico Minack (enrico.minack@informatik.tu-chemnitz.de) écrivait : > > I use kmix as mixer, but there is nothing in it about a > > "capture channel". How could I find where it is defined ? > then try alsamixer or amixer and watch out for capture and unmute and apply > this for the according channel (mic, line-in, pcm or master) Hum... the problem is that RH 9 uses
2004 Aug 06
3
No sound (ices-2.0.0, RH9)
* EvilOverlord (eviloverlord@kucs.net) écrivait : > In whatever you use as mixer control for the soundcard (alsamixer, > aumix, etc) what is set as the "capture" channel? Your soundcard may > not support capturing what is being played. If it helps : my soundcard is a ES1988 Allegro-1, the module is "maestro3". I use kmix as mixer, but there is nothing in it about a
2004 Aug 06
1
Q: Is it possible?
> You will hit two problems though. The first is that you will need to have > a stream for remote participants to listen to. Yeah, that's right. If you want the remote speakers to be able to listen to the other speakers this becomes a little complicated. If you hear your own voice with a latency more than 1/10 or 1/5 second it becomes very distracting! This latency really is a problem.
2004 Aug 06
3
Q: Is it possible?
wow, Enrico ... it's a great help ;-) I comment: ----- Original Message ----- From: "Enrico Minack" <enrico.minack@informatik.tu-chemnitz.de> To: <icecast@xiph.org> Sent: Wednesday, February 11, 2004 8:00 PM Subject: Re: [icecast] Q: Is it possible? <p>> Hi Raúl, > > interesting project ;-) So this is what I would recommend. For a number of > remote
2004 Aug 06
1
How calculate bandwith - How listeners
768 download and 512 upload. Now my question is I just can have 32 user listen my radio??? <p>>From: "Enrico Minack" <enrico.minack@informatik.tu-chemnitz.de> >Reply-To: icecast@xiph.org >To: <icecast@xiph.org> >Subject: Re: [icecast] How calculate bandwith - How listeners >Date: Thu, 27 May 2004 22:03:38 +0200 > > > I have two lines ADSL
2004 Aug 06
2
changeowner question
I just installed Icecast2 and the installation was a sucess. However, when I go to startup Icecast. It's reply is: [root@linuxserver bin]# ./icecast -c /etc/icecast.xml WARNING: You should not run icecast2 as root Use the changeowner directive in the config file [root@linuxserver bin]# <p>So then I go into the icecast.xml and alter the changeowner User to admin. Here is a bit from my
2004 Aug 06
1
MP3 push software?
> What are my options for grabbing a source at one server and sending > it on another without re-encoding? find a client for icecast (mpg123, wget, fetch, ...), put the content to standard out, find a source for darwin (sorry, I don't know any) and let it use the standard in. Enrico --- >8 ---- List archives: http://www.xiph.org/archives/ icecast project homepage:
2004 Aug 06
2
No sound (ices-2.0.0, RH9)
Thanks Geoff, it's becoming more clear to me now... > So, assuming it does, you could try: > aumix -w r [yann@raglou yann]$ aumix -w R [yann@raglou yann]$ aumix -q vol 100, 100 pcm 100, 100 speaker 0, 0 line 0, 0, P mic 4, 0, P cd 0, 0, P igain 0, 0, P line1 0, 0, R phin 0, 0, P phout 0, 0 video 0, 0, P No "R" on the pcm line, so that is probably the problem : my soundcard
2004 Aug 06
2
No sound (ices-2.0.0, RH9)
* Enrico Minack (enrico.minack@informatik.tu-chemnitz.de) écrivait : > > No "R" on the pcm line, so that is probably the problem : my soundcard can > > only record line1... > doesn't this mean that pcm is captured at the moment? > just try this: use aumix, go to mic, pcm or master and press space, then > this might be captured (a R appears left to the bar). I
2004 Aug 06
3
official communication protocol definition / documentation?
Hello, I am looking for a documentation of the communication protocolls icecast is capable of: ICY, XAUDIOCAST and a modified HTTP. In order to write client software being capable of all available features I was searching on the net for those documentations but no luck so far. How come? Isn't this protocoll documented? How does the developer team know what options and functins are available
2004 Aug 06
3
Q: Is it possible?
Hi from spain! (sorry, I speak only a little english) I collaborate with an spanish NGO and we're planning to set up an Internet radio station. I would like to base our project on linux and Icecast / liveice (right?) but I don't understand some terms of "radio" practices. I need your experience&help; the project should cover the following scenarios: * A broadcast server
2004 Aug 06
3
protocol documentation + load balancing
> > I am looking for a documentation of the communication protocolls icecast is > > capable of: ICY, XAUDIOCAST and a modified HTTP... > You should use libshout2. It's a handy dandy library... Yeah, I am familiar with this library, but as I know this is just for sources. I am more interested in requirements clients have to meet, what header response options are available, and
2004 Aug 06
2
Configuring icecast for lowest buffering/latency
On Wednesday 24 March 2004 03:53, Enrico Minack wrote: > Why do you consider livecaster's stream being more efficient than the > HTTP-Stream? Actually, after the HTTP-Header there are just raw MP3-Data. > In comparision to that, livecaster puts these MP3-Data into an > RTP-protokoll, which produces more overhead than 'raw' http. And you may be > faced random packet loss.
2011 Jun 27
2
Multiple mount points without dynamic reencoding
Hello: I am running the icecast2.3.2 server and ices0.4 with a perl script which provides the filename of the next track to play. I am reencoding in advance using ffmpeg, which has been very reliable. My main stream is mp3, 64kbps / 44.1 kHz (mono) and I have pre-reencoded the tracks to 32kbps / 22.05 kHz (mono), for a lower data rate stream. At this time, I have not figured out how to get a
2004 Aug 06
2
icecast 2.0.0 chroot problem
Hello, I seem to have a problem getting icecast 2.0.0 to start. I get the following message: [root@fels icecast]# /usr/local/bin/icecast -c /usr/local/bin/icecast.xml WARNING: You should not run icecast2 as root Use the changeowner directive in the config file I have not tampered with the default "security" section of the xml. <security>
2004 Aug 06
4
ices 0.2.2 does not reencode mp3s
I recently upgraded ices from 0.1.0 to 0.2.2. I have found that it is not reencoding my mp3 stream, even though I have it configured to. This is on a RedHat linux 7.0 system, kernel 2.4.11 ices build commands: ./configure --with-perl --with-lame \ --with-lame-includes=/usr/local/src/lame-3.89/include \ --with-lame-libraries=/usr/local/src/lame-3.89/libmp3lame/.libs gmake
2004 Aug 06
2
ices - cpu cycles - re encodig
At 02:53 PM 30/10/2002 -0700, you wrote: >Bastard is used in a negative context here :) A snippit of a top >command reveals: > >PID USER PRI NI SIZE RSS SHARE STAT %CPU %MEM TIME COMMAND >3246 root 15 0 2436 2436 1280 S 10.5 3.9 0:14 ices > > >I am re encoding using: > > <encode> >
2005 Jan 14
2
cpu time by reencode
hi, ices with reencode make al lot of cpu work. the pid need more then 20% of it. its a 2,8 ghz cpu. is it normal ? thanks -- Mit freundlichen Gr?ssen Carsten Henkel mailto:carsten@chatlabel.de Wer nach einer hilfreichen Hand Ausschau halten will, findet sie am besten am Ende des eigenen Armes dieser Text ist zuf?llig gew?hlt und hat nichts mit dem Empf?nger
2004 Aug 06
4
load balancing
> > One more detail about Icecast2 that I'd like to know is whether there is any > > load-balancing feature implemented or about to be implement? ... > I haven't heard or seen of this, nor do I think load balencing as you > describe it could be done seamlessly without modifying the media player. I made some tests and it turned out that Winamp, mpg123 and even MS Media