similar to: How to use Patch-o-matic ?

The rsync faq-o-matic was broken during the recent machine migration. Since there was relatively little useful content and a lot of unanswered or pointless questions, I am going to remove the links to it. If anyone feels like maintaining an FAQ please do so. -- Martin -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: not available Type:

Hi, I work in Dell Support and I have a customer with a PowerEdge 1650 Server with Intel? PRO/1000 XT (82544GC Gigabit Ethernet Controllers). The nic is integrated on the motherboard. The customer is using a Linux system with DHCP+tftp to PXE boot and load an MS-Dos 6.22 image, with an UNDI driver, over to the PowerEdge 1650 and then map a Samba share to install Windows 2000. The customer get

Hello, Is there is iptables and kernel package support for patch-o-matic? System: Centos 4.3 Thank you. Rgds, Asfihani

Hi all, I haven''t been paying attention to this for a while, but now that I download the latest patch-o-matic-ng, I see that most of the patches are gone... Anybody have an idea where I can download the ''extras'' repository? Specifically geoip. Thanks! -justin

--KMIs29sPfC/9Gbii Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Good news, Everyone! (TM) The netfilter core team announces a new release of the netfilter patch-o-matic suite: patch-o-matic-20030107 This release contains the most up-to-date bugfixes and new features for=20 the netfilter/iptables subsystem of the 2.4.x Linux

--BU7+kJFeeDlNltZg Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Good news, Everyone! (TM) The netfilter core team announces a new release of the netfilter patch-o-matic suite: patch-o-matic-20030912 This release contains the most up-to-date bugfixes and new features for=20 the netfilter/iptables subsystem of the 2.4.x Linux

Hi, I am trying to install some additional iptables modules on a CentOS 5 Box (imq, tarpit, geoip). Can anyone recommend a version of patch-o-matic-ng that works well with the CentOS 5 kernel sources (2.6.18-8.1.4)? The most current version (patch-o-matic-ng-20070521.tar.bz2) does not compile. With patch-o-matic-ng-20061128.tar.bz2 I could at least get tarpit working but geoip and imq seem

Stian B. Barmen schrieb: > I try to use patch-o-matic-ng for installation. Kernel patching works > nicely but the libipt_ipp2p.so shared object does not get built. I find > the .c file in the patch-o-matic tree under ipp2p but I don''t know how > to manually compile it. > My lsmod includes the sucsessfully made ipt_ipp2p module and I also > recompiled iptables for

https://bugzilla.netfilter.org/cgi-bin/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46 Summary: ..patch-o-matic: nfnetlink_conntrack.c or -.h ... compile failure: Product: netfilter/iptables Version: patch-o-matic Platform: i386 OS/Version: RedHat Linux Status: NEW Severity: blocker Priority: P2 Component:

https://bugzilla.netfilter.org/cgi-bin/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46 laforge@netfilter.org changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED ------- Additional Comments From laforge@netfilter.org 2003-02-08 13:06 ------- what compiler are you

https://bugzilla.netfilter.org/cgi-bin/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46 ------- Additional Comments From arnt@c2i.net 2003-02-08 18:09 ------- ..sorry, this is crucial info; compilers: RH-7.3: [root@gw linux-2.4.18-24.7.x]# rpm -q gcc gcc-2.96-113 [root@gw linux-2.4.18-24.7.x]# ...and ditto for RH-8.0: [root@fw linux-2.4.18-24.8.0]# rpm -q gcc gcc-3.2-7

https://bugzilla.netfilter.org/cgi-bin/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46 laforge@netfilter.org changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Severity|blocker |trivial ------- Additional Comments From laforge@netfilter.org 2003-02-14 09:27 ------- #include

Hi Guys, I''m trying to compile IMQ with kernel-2.4.26 and iptables-1.2.9 and I want to know is this procedure is correct: ---------------------------------------- - In Kernel 2.4.26 Directory (/usr/src/linux) # cd /usr/src/linux # wget http://www.linuximq.net/patchs/linux-2.4.24-imq.diff # patch -p1 < linux-2.4.24-imq.diff - In Patch O Matic Directory

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 claas@rootdir.de wrote: > Hello, > > > I am trying to get ipsec with kernel 2.6.8.1 and shorewall 2.1.9 running, > but I still have a problem: > > Validating hosts file... > Error: Your kernel and/or iptables does not not support policy match: ipsec > > I had a look for netfilter patch-o-matic, but I did not find the

hi, there is no support for patch-o-matic netfilter modules. what i have to do if i want to use several patch-o-matic modules? which parts of code has to be changed and will that changed be included into the main shorewall tree in future or not? best regards claus

Hello! I need assistance to solve my problem related to traffic shaping based on the user ids. The problem: each unix user (of the linux host) has to be limited with incoming channel (internet) bandwidth. I need this to implement internet access solution based on ltsp (http://www.ltsp.org). As far as I know the best way to shape traffic in linux is CBQ. But there is no filter based on unix

What about benchmarks on other Arm devices? On 02/26/2013 02:52 PM, Jim Grosbach wrote: > Cortex-M0 is a Thumb1 only device. There hasn't been any concerted > effort to tune LLVM's Thumb1 output in quite a long time. Even back then > (2008 or so), the effort was mainly to get it to work acceptably, with > the real performance tuning work being done for Thumb2. I'm not >

I've not run any on non-iOS devices, and haven't looked at GCC since v4.2.1 due to licensing issues, so I don't have a good feel for comparative benchmarking. -Jim On Feb 26, 2013, at 4:20 PM, Reed Kotler <rkotler at mips.com> wrote: > What about benchmarks on other Arm devices? > > On 02/26/2013 02:52 PM, Jim Grosbach wrote: >> Cortex-M0 is a Thumb1 only

I want to compile a custom xenU kernel for a firewall distribution (endianfw, version of ipcop), I can get it to load up but the kernel is missing some modules that aren''t resident. So I want to make a custom version for this domU, I know what I need kernel+openswan+xen+patch-o-matic but I not sure the best way to go about this, do I patch a fedora source or start with a vanilla kernel?

HI zytor, I hope you can help me. I have above network chipset on a Mitsubishi im-2000 mobo. I don't see an actual chip on the mobo w/ this ID so I suspect it embedded in the mobo BIOS or in one of the 3 Intel chips. I am attempting to use LTSP to boot a workstation w/ above NIC chipset. It has imbedded boot to net software (Intel Landesk service agt v.99b) using PXE. I can't get it