similar to: Re: Problem with fresh two nic installation on FC3 (fwd)

Hi, I''m having problems with new Shorewall installation on Fedora Core 3 (had same problem with Core 2 and upgrade did not help even iptables was upgraded from 1.2.9 to 1.2.11). I''ve followed two nic example, but starting Shorewall drops all connections and don''t permit any outgoing requests, even with "all allowed" policy. Policy file is below. Current setup

Season Greetings to all Tom, in your faq, u have this noted: While I am currently using the HTB version of The Wonder Shaper (I just copied wshaper.htb to /etc/shorewall/tcstart and modified it as shown in the Wondershaper README), I treid this with wondershaper, using Bearing Leaf 1.0 stable i even changed the tc command to run_tc, and tried it in both angles, and i receive the following..

Hi, first of all, let me thank you for your great Shoreline Firewall. I use it with great success at home (protecting my WiFi connection). And now if I could have a question about traffic shaping. I did read everything I could find but I still have two problems: first, the MARK from tcrules is not working in HTB based simple tc filter line ("handle $MARK fw classid 1:20"). If I switch

While I was doing come compatibility testing with various shells, I noticed the following: Using /bin/sh (which is ''bash'' on my RedHat installation): Shorewall Restarted real 0m21.246s user 0m9.650s sys 0m11.460s Using /bin/ash: Shorewall Restarted real 0m9.054s user 0m3.880s sys 0m5.070s The version of ash that I used is the one available from the

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 http://shorewall.net/pub/shorewall/2.0/shorewall-2.0.10 ftp://shorewall.net/pub/shorewall/2.0/shorewall-2.0.10 Nothing Earth-shattering here and there is no reason to upgrade if you are not seeing one of the corrected problems. - ----------------------------------------------------------------------- Problems corrected in version 2.0.10 1) The

Hi All, I have a custom TC configuration where I''m building the tc hierarchy manually with the tcstart script. I also need to add custom iptables rules in the mangle table to classify the packets. Currently I''m using started to insert the iptables commands, but that''s way too late in the process. I tried putting them into the initdone file, but it''s trying to

Dear all, Has anyone experienced this whilst running DRBD over eth1 between two CentOS 5.7 servers? eth1 is a private IP address, unroutable. eth0 is the public address. CentOS will reply sometimes once every 3 days or every 14mins~ saying "My public IP is on eth1" to arp requests when it's not, it's eth0. This freezes traffic and causes issues. We've looked at arp*

We have a webserver that is connected to three different networks. Due to our cabling, we have to run two of those networks over the same physical network. When connecting from OS X and Windows we are occasionally blocked because the client is sending to the wrong interface. Linux clients seem to have no problem at all. I have read the docs and understand that the problems exists because of

Hello all, I have an annoying networking issue. The value of arp_filter is getting changed. /proc/sys/net/ipv4/conf/eth0/arp_filter 1 I specifically set it to 0 via /sbin/ifup-local. The hosts in question are setup to test some network gear, and they all have 1 "management" interface and 1 or more through put interface. Any ideas on how to keep this value from changing? -- Milton

Hello, LARTC mailing readers, I hope u can help with this mysterious issue i''m having with my linux box acting as a router. Scenario: Linux running 2.6.8.1 /w julians patches Latest iproute (iproute2-ss040702) 4 NICS ----------------- | x eth0 (63.43.x.x) network mask (255.255.240.0) | | x eth1 (63.43.x.x)

Hello, LARTC mailing readers, I hope u can help with this mysterious issue i''m having with my linux box acting as a router. Scenario: Linux running 2.6.8.1 /w julians patches /w support for multipath routing Latest iproute (iproute2-ss040702) 4 NICS ----------------- | x eth0 (63.43.x.x) network mask (255.255.240.0) | |

https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=94367 --- Comment #3 from Riku Voipio <riku.voipio at iki.fi> --- I have similar corruption on GK107, and also in the closed: https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=98266 Debian stretch up date Kernel: 4.9.0-1 xserver: 1.19.0-3 nouveau: 1.0.13-1 Nothing else seems common with the other reporters but the use of modeset and kde5. -- You

https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=94367 --- Comment #4 from Riku Voipio <riku.voipio at iki.fi> --- Created attachment 129248 --> https://bugs.freedesktop.org/attachment.cgi?id=129248&action=edit Debian xorg.0.log -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug. -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL:

On 2019-12-02 13:42, Riku via dovecot wrote: > Hello. > My name is Riku. > > Currently, I use Dovecot as a proxy for another SMTP server. > However, this seems to cause the IP address of the "received" header > to be that of the proxy server. > Is it possible to change this so that the IP address of the sender is > entered? > The version of Dovecot is

> On 2 Dec 2019, at 19.23, Tom Sommer via dovecot <dovecot at dovecot.org> wrote: > > > On 2019-12-02 13:42, Riku via dovecot wrote: >> Hello. >> My name is Riku. >> Currently, I use Dovecot as a proxy for another SMTP server. >> However, this seems to cause the IP address of the "received" header >> to be that of the proxy server.

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 Hi, this might seem like a classical problem but I''ve trouble getting this working correctly: # ifconfig ### output stripped down: eth0 Link encap:Ethernet HWaddr 00:50:FC:2B:EB:1B inet addr:192.168.5.220 Bcast:192.168.5.255 Mask:255.255.255.0 eth1 Link encap:Ethernet HWaddr 00:02:44:60:EC:58 inet

Hello. My name is Riku. Currently, I use Dovecot as a proxy for another SMTP server. However, this seems to cause the IP address of the "received" header to be that of the proxy server. Is it possible to change this so that the IP address of the sender is entered? The version of Dovecot is "2.3.8 (9df20d2db)". Sorry for the incomprehensible explanation. Thank you. Best

Hi ! Recently i switched my internet provider, to get more speed but another braindead setup regarding public ip addresses. I now have 4 PPTP Tunnel available, of which i''m using one as the gateway ip doing masquerading to other machines in my local lan, excluding three other machines, which i would like to use 1:1 nat to get them a direct access to one of the pptp tunnels. I was

I got stuck with Wine on 64-bit Fedora Core 3. I can not remember when it happened (I was using wine few times a month), but somehow wine stopped working. I have removed all rpms and installed wine20050111-1fc3 rpm but when I start wine for the first time as a "normal" user, it fails with the following: wine: creating configuration directory '/home/robert/.wine'... wine:

Hi everyone, I don''t know if you remember me, but i had a problem with a machine performing bridge (bridge-utils) and firewall (shorewall) duties. I wanted to control traffic in this machine using iproute2 and tc command with the tcstart and tcrules file in shorewall configuration. My machine hanged up when I used my traffic control script that way, but I found a solution :) The key