similar to: icecast2,shout,encryption (was compile error, now is new install =)

On Wed, Apr 02, 2003 at 09:09:28AM -0700, Kerry Cox wrote: > I'm going to have to step in here now and say a few things. > I maintain the http://quasi.ksl.com/icecast/ page. I had hoped I had > made it clear that the instructions outlined there are based on > downloading the source from CVS. I have tested the instructions on my > page on several occasions, each time with

Good point. I just read that thread the other day. I will be sure to add the part about unencrypted passwords as soon as I get a chance. No offense was taken. But I want people to be sure to let me know if they find any problems or errors with the docs. The docs are only as good as the feedback given. Best of luck. KJ <p>On Wed, 2003-04-02 at 09:53, David Correa wrote: > On Wed, Apr 02,

On Tue, Apr 01, 2003 at 05:36:37PM +0200, boink wrote: > > in the FreeBSD ports there already is something for ices2 and icecast2. > it's a little on the old side (from november 2002). Hello, I tried icecast2 (couple days ago, ports gets upgraded daily) on a FreeBSD 4.X (4.8-RC) and since it compiles (by default) to use encrypted passwords i could not make it work. I used the

Hiya Boink, On Wed, Apr 02, 2003 at 10:08:54AM +0200, boink wrote: > No, it is not a FreeBSD ports problem. It's your own problem. heh, i have better things to worry about. > there are over 8000 ported applications in the FreeBSD ports system. the > concept of the ports is simply to install software, like icecast2, onto > a FreeBSD with the needed patches for FreeBSD as

I'm going to have to step in here now and say a few things. I maintain the http://quasi.ksl.com/icecast/ page. I had hoped I had made it clear that the instructions outlined there are based on downloading the source from CVS. I have tested the instructions on my page on several occasions, each time with success. However, I am willing to admit there may be some discrepancies. If you or anyone

On Wed, Apr 02, 2003 at 10:59:00AM -0700, Kerry Cox wrote: > The docs are only as > good as the feedback given. > Best of luck. > KJ Pax, Also, you might want to mention the compatibility issues between icecast2 and shout. I will test again when i get a chance, i am almost sure that i compiled first icecast2 (from the port) and that server_info said "Using crypt" (this

No, it is not a FreeBSD ports problem. It's your own problem. there are over 8000 ported applications in the FreeBSD ports system. the concept of the ports is simply to install software, like icecast2, onto a FreeBSD with the needed patches for FreeBSD as quickly as possible. No software from the ports is ever changed in the way you just mentioned. that's totally against the point of

On Wed, Apr 02, 2003 at 09:26:53AM +1000, Michael Smith wrote: > icecast2 does not use "encrypted" passwords. I considered that a feature not > worth adding, since (done the way icecast 1.x did it) it adds zero additional > security. Hi Mike, Could be a FreeBSD Ports problem? It seemed to me that t was compiled with that feature. erver_info would mention "Using

Hello, I hope this is the place to bug ppl about compile errors. So here I go. I downloaded the latest through CVS last night and ran ./autogen.sh according to the manual and ran into the following error. Does anyone happen to have a fix for it? I am on FreeBSD 4.6 Stable. Thanks in advance, Till << ./autogen.sh output and error message >> elation# ./autogen.sh I am going to run

Em 10-09-2018 10:43, Rowland Penny via samba escreveu: > On Mon, 10 Sep 2018 09:56:46 -0400 > spiderslack via samba <samba at lists.samba.org> wrote: > >> Hi, all >> >> >> I trying setting domain samba with bind9-DLZ. I followed the tutorial >> https://wiki.samba.org/index.php/Setting_up_Samba_as_an_Active_Directory_Domain_Controller, >> but not

hello! While trying to compile the new and final icecast2, I got this compile error on the make: make[3]: *** [xslt.o] Error 1 make[3]: Leaving directory `/home/boink/icecast-2.0.0/src' make[2]: *** [all-recursive] Error 1 make[2]: Leaving directory `/home/boink/icecast-2.0.0/src' make[1]: *** [all-recursive] Error 1 make[1]: Leaving directory `/home/boink/icecast-2.0.0' make: ***

you also need the dev's aswell <p>> >hello! > >While trying to compile the new and final icecast2, I got this compile >error on the make: > >make[3]: *** [xslt.o] Error 1 >make[3]: Leaving directory `/home/boink/icecast-2.0.0/src' >make[2]: *** [all-recursive] Error 1 >make[2]: Leaving directory `/home/boink/icecast-2.0.0/src' >make[1]: ***

Full_Name: Jeff Hallman Version: 1.2.2 OS: Solaris Submission from: (NULL) (132.200.32.33) "boink<-" <- function(x, a = 1, b = 2, value){ print(match.call()) x } > z <- 1 > boink(z, b = 4) <- 22 boink<-(x = *tmp*, a = 4, value = 22) > Shouldn't it have matched the 4 to b, not a?

well, good, I suppose you want to set up an icecast2 server on a debian box? Am I right? Good, if I'm right, get the latest sources from the xiph.org cvs. before compiling these sources, you'll need the latest libxslt, libxml2 and the libcurl latest stuff. another problem on a debian box is if you choose to use icecast2 and compiling it yourself, you will be working outside the debian

hehe... i don't think it's that difficult to guess ;) we just want to successfully compile the actual snapshot of libshout. As I had said before, I haven't tried to compile the latest version yet, but the previous versions gave me the same errors when trying to compile them. boink wrote: >it's a little difficult for us to read minds. > >What do you *exactly* want to

hello, I like your point here .. it's difficult to make such a comparision, since yacast.fr choosed to stream like that. Why did they choose to stream like that? That's beyond me, since Radio France has a budjet of millions. The point of this comparision was to show why is Radio France doing and paying for something like this? Me, with cheap computers which were had no more value (well,

yum was unable to find and install netatalk, so i used RH9 package. It successfully installed, but didn't started. Dmesg showed me that some module is missing. I pressume I will need to compile new kernel, right ? Best Regards Kuba

--- boink <boink@tetter.xs4all.nl> wrote: > The ogg stream is running at around 30 kbps/11 kHz in stereo. The > WMA > stream (provided by yacast.fr) is running at 16 kbps/22 kHz in > mono. Is stereo vs. mono, and 22khz vs. 11khz even a fair comparison? 22khz vs. 11khz: 22khz, by definition, gives the 22khz stream much more frequency range and *opportunity* to sound clearer.

well because I really wanted to tune in however I was behind a windows nt machine that was "locked down". I can't dl anything to it; only has wmp with mp3 support that is the only reason! :P <p>----- Original Message ----- From: boink To: icecast@xiph.org Sent: Sat, 15 Mar 2003 23:21:20 +0100 Subject: Re: [icecast] SXSW.com fun <p>must there be mp3 streams? why is

yes. look at what the port maintainer did. how many times do I have to explain this? boink On Wed, Apr 02, 2003 at 04:28:42AM +0000, till@klimpong.com wrote: > duh?! > > the port complains about my libtool being outdated, although i installed the latest from gnu.org. > > any more advice? > > > > > yes, look at what the port maintainer did *duh* > > >