similar to: icecast 1.x vs icecast 2

Displaying 20 results from an estimated 20000 matches similar to: "icecast 1.x vs icecast 2"

2004 Aug 06
0
icecast 1.x vs icecast 2
If you search the archives someone posted an unofficial howto to get icecast2 started. Was immensely helpful on the config file side of things. I then stumbled across a short specification on the ices config file which helped me figure out how to properly hook up a perl script to ices. >===== Original Message From <ronnie@mixsessions.com> ===== >okay those are good reasons but
2004 Aug 06
0
icecast 1.x vs icecast 2
yes I got that info <p>----- Original Message ----- From: M Edwards <medwards@ualberta.ca> To: <icecast@xiph.org> Cc: Date: Subject: RE: [icecast] icecast 1.x vs icecast 2 If you search the archives someone posted an unofficial howto to get icecast2 started. Was immensely helpful on the config file side of things. I then stumbled across a short specification on the ices
2004 Aug 06
3
icecast 1.x vs icecast 2
There isn't much info on the website...I guess I was expecting some beter documentattion. ----- Original Message ----- From: Michael Smith <msmith@xiph.org> To: icecast@xiph.org Cc: Date: Subject: Re: [icecast] icecast 1.x vs icecast 2 On Wednesday 19 February 2003 14:01, ronnie@mixsessions.com wrote: > okay those are good reasons but where can I get more info > > The
2004 Aug 06
1
icecast 1.x vs icecast 2
upgrade to icecast2? Should I? <p>I have found alot on info on icecast 1.x. I am familiar with how to use it and what it can do for me. I may be looking in the wrong places but I feel info on icecast 2 is limitted and sometimes confusing. Is there anyone out there that can direct me to info on icecast2. Or maybe explain what the big advantage would be to change or upgrade to version 2. I
2004 Aug 06
1
format icecast.log to html
Could you elaborate on what you mean by "http log analysis tools out there on icecast log files"? <p>----- Original Message ----- From: Michael Smith To: "icecast@xiph.org" <icecast@xiph.org> Sent: Tue, 29 Apr 2003 12:28:06 +1000 Subject: Re: [icecast] format icecast.log to html "ronnie@mixsessions.com" <ronnie@mixsessions.com> said: > > I
2004 Aug 06
2
syntax for playlist
I should be more specific . What I meant to ask was - is it necessary for the directory that icecast streams or serves files from to "everyone" or the "world" have at least read permissions. I do plan to experiment with the permisions but I was just asking to see if any one had already tried this. I like to lock down my system as much as possible. Thanks for the help!
2004 Aug 06
0
icecast 1.x vs icecast 2
thanks! ----- Original Message ----- From: Kerry Cox <kerry.cox@ksl.com> To: Icecast mailing list <icecast@xiph.org> Cc: Date: Subject: Re: [icecast] icecast 1.x vs icecast 2 <p>--=-yzJC+pyJDj1RouYtMnAL Content-Type: text/plain Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable You may want to try my site at http://quasi.ksl.com/icecast/. There is also a link to a legacy page that
2004 Aug 06
1
compilling error ices-0.2.3.tar.gz
Ooff! I am using ices2. Well that explains it then! I am new to linux and I thank you very much for your help and patience. Please just some clarification. To get cvs version of ices for mp3 streaming compatibilty with Icecast2: cvs -d :pserver:anoncvs@cvs.xiph.org:/cvs/ice login pw:anoncvs cvs -d :pserver:anoncvs@cvs.xiph.org:/cvs/ice -z 9 co ices or cvs -d
2004 Aug 06
1
compilling error ices-0.2.3.tar.gz
sorry about that. I decided to install the latest ices from cvs instead. However I encountered another problem. I have the latest libshout, icecast and ices. All were compilled without problems. I am trying to stream in mp3 format but when I run ices I receive errors that read something similar to '/path/to/mp3file/song.mp3 - possibly corrupt or malformed data'. The entire playlist will
2004 Aug 06
1
Icecast and Liveice
<quote who="Jose Julian Buda"> > From: <ronnie@mixsessions.com> > > you need to create a .m3u file to launch the media player. In this > > file you should have 'protocol://url:port#/mountpoint' > > > > ex: > > in my 'ices.m3u' I have: > > > > http://stream.goingcreative.net:8000/houze > > in what directory do
2004 Aug 06
1
compilling error ices-0.2.3.tar.gz
thnks for the clarfication. I downloaded libshout2 and ices-0.2 from cvs. I compiled libshout with out a problem but when i try and compile ices I get the following error: <p><p>checking whether to build shared libraries... yes checking whether to build static libraries... yes checking whether -lc should be explicitly linked in... no checking shout/shout.h usability... yes checking
2004 Aug 06
0
format icecast.log to html
ok now i know, thanks anyway <p>----- Original Message ----- From: Kerry Cox To: icecast@xiph.org Sent: 28 Apr 2003 20:41:39 -0600 Subject: Re: [icecast] format icecast.log to html <p><p>Analog, webalizer, etc, to name a few. These are relatively easy to setup and get running. KJ <p>On Mon, 2003-04-28 at 20:36, ronnie@mixsessions.com wrote: > > Could you elaborate
2004 Aug 06
1
format icecast.log to html
I am currently using icecast 1.3x. I would like to know if there is a way I can dump the contents of 'icecast.log' into html or maybe format variables to create an html doc. I looked through my icecast manual but I couldn't find any info or variables used for the log file. Ultimately what I want is to see who, when, and how long it takes to dl a static file. <p><p>---
2004 Aug 06
2
Placing Icecast in a chroot jail
On Thu, 2002-12-19 at 01:30, msmith@labyrinth.net.au wrote: > Alan Silvester <mascdman@shaw.ca> said: > > > Hi, > > > > (Sorry for the long email) > > > > As a bit of a learning exercise, I'm trying to place the icecast daemon > > in a chroot jail. I've been mostly sucessful: I can get icecast to > > serve the default stream from
2004 Aug 06
2
Icecast and Liveice
you need to create a .m3u file to launch the media player. In this file you should have 'protocol://url:port#/mountpoint' ex: in my 'ices.m3u' I have: http://stream.goingcreative.net:8000/houze <p>Once you are done point your browser to the .m3u file to launch your media player <p><p><p><p> ----- Original Message ----- From: Jose Julian Buda To:
2004 Aug 06
0
Performance icecast
hi michael, What OS are you running on that? and everyone, thanx for your quick replies!! On Sat, 2002-12-14 at 03:44, msmith@labyrinth.net.au wrote: > "M.C. van Dorp" <matthijs@netintegrator.nl> said: > > > Hi > > thanx for even reading this > > > > I really like icecast and i use it very happily. > > Now i'm planning to co-locate a
2004 Aug 06
1
IceS playlist & directory ?
Greetings Is it possible to command IceS to play from a directory instead of creating a playlist with several hundred mp3's. I have read through the threads and notice that Ices can do some great things but I am swithching from a Win2k environment so I am not familiar with python and perl. Is what I am asking possible? Is there some one willing to share scripts created for Ices?
2004 Aug 06
1
compilling error ices-0.2.3.tar.gz
dowloaded the latest libshout and icecast2 from cvs. I also downloaded ices-0.2.3.tar.gz from icecast.org for mp3 suport. Libshout compiled succesfully but when i tried to compile ices i received the following error. please help. <p>make[3]: *** [playlist.o] Error 1 make[3]: Leaving directory `/root/stream/ices-0.2.3/src/playlist' make[2]: *** [all-recursive] Error 1 make[2]: Leaving
2004 Aug 06
0
Icecast2 issues continue
--------------------------------------- Regards, Slava Shklyar ----- Original Message ----- From: "Michael Smith" <msmith@labyrinth.net.au> To: <icecast@xiph.org> Sent: Wednesday, October 09, 2002 11:14 Subject: Re: [icecast] Icecast2 issues continue <p>> At 04:08 PM 10/9/02 +1000, you wrote: > >Hi: > > > >Well, up until about a week ago, we had
2004 Aug 06
0
Icecast2 issues continue
--------------------------------------- Regards, Slava Shklyar ----- Original Message ----- From: "Michael Smith" <msmith@labyrinth.net.au> To: <icecast@xiph.org> Sent: Wednesday, October 09, 2002 11:14 Subject: Re: [icecast] Icecast2 issues continue <p>> At 04:08 PM 10/9/02 +1000, you wrote: > >Hi: > > > >Well, up until about a week ago, we had