similar to: BitTorrent uploads enabled?

Hello, I'm running centos5. I'm wanting this machine only, none of my other ones, to participate in p2p file sharing, bittorrent, edonkey, maybe other networks. Does anyone have a howto or step by step guide for this? I've installed bittorrent and mldonkey clients, but neither is working, i'm assuming gateway firewall issue, but i've enabled the correct ports, 6881

Hey, Lance mentioned yum group install. This yum group capability makes the "server" CD's more versatile than the name implies -- you only need a broadband connection to get any kind of CentOS install you want. Start with a minimal install off the CD, and then use the yum group install to conveniently get the same install you could get off the 3 CD set (only more up to date).

Hello. I have just started using iproute2 commands, and I am having a go at making bittorrent use the same bandwidth for upload as for download. I am stuck I think in understanding speeds I connect to the internet through a router modem which gets the real IP and assigns me a private ip through dhcp. So this router can handle a private network, and route it to the internet, pressumably with nat.

The CentOS team is happy to announce the availability of a release candidate for CentOS 3.4 x86_64. This product supports AMD64 and Intel EM64T processors. Individual binary iso files are available from: http://beta.centos.org/centos/3.4beta/isos/x86_64/ A bit torrent for the 4 binary iso images is available from:

Does anyone here implement traffic shaping with shorewall? I need to shape BitTorrent traffic on my network so that upload/downloads do not overwhelm normal function or, even more importantly, my imminent conversion to VOIP for all telephone service. I followed the shorewall documentation guide but am not sure if what I have done is the Right Way Of Doing Things. Nor am I satsified with the

It seems like more efficient file transfer technology may be about as important to bringing video production and distribution to the masses as more efficient video compression. I'm wondering how much of a difference BitTorrent made in the downloads of the theora sample files. Is there a record of the number of downloads that were made, and the number of Gbytes that were sent from the server

If I remember correctly, when version 5.3 was released, about 95% was made available by BitTorrent before the official release date, so that the entire file would be available as soon as possible after the release. Could the same be done this time? -- Yves Bellefeuille <yan at storm.ca> "Yves Bellefeuille: Eterna malvenkanto en UEA" -- Heroldo Komunikas, n-ro 389

Nux! <nux at li.nux.ro> writes: > I recommend you stick to Transmission since it's in Base. For the record and the benefit of anyone reading the list archives, Transmission appears to be in EPEL, not Base.

Hi All, tried to install the RPM for bittorrent, and got the following, [root at localhost bittorrent]# rpm -Uvh BitTorrent-4.2.2-1-Python2.3.noarch.rpm error: Failed dependencies: python(abi) = 2.3 is needed by BitTorrent-4.2.2-1.noarch [root at localhost bittorrent]# python -V Python 2.3.4 why is this so, when I have 2.3.4. Is this RPM only compatible with 2.3, not 2.3.1-4? Little confused.

Hello, Full disclosure: my name is Farid Fadaie and I'm in charge of BitTorrent Bleep (a private P2P SIP-based messaging application in early alpha) http://blog.bittorrent.com/2014/07/30/building-an-engine-for-decentralized-communications/ I have personally been a fan of Asterisk and have been using it for years and now that we have (kind of) released Bleep, I wanted to ask you guys to let

Folks. This is likely to be the hardest hit CentOS has ever taken with regards to bandwidth needs. I was really hesitant to use bittorrent for this type of thing for a long time. However, it really is nice to give back at least what you take. At the moment, I'm seeing almost 3000 connections to the torrent. That times 3.5 gigs is a pretty huge chunk of data... and it has just begun. What

Hi all, Just switched my home computer from Windows 7 to CentOS 6.6 and I'm having a slight bit of trouble with the bittorrent-clients. * Transmission is fine but lacks "a bit" in features. * Vuze is my preferred bt-client but gives me horrendous gfx-artifacts, like not showing the torrent name (it's white text on a white background or some such...). * Deluge is better, and

At home I have CentOS 4.4 running on a Compaq Presario with an ATI Radeon 200G video chipset. Naturally, the linux driver support ATI offers are pretty crappy, thus many postings to many web sites on problems and possible resolutions. I forget where, and natually I didn't bookmark it, but there was one web site that provided the exact working solution. From then on, my video support

Any suggestion for a 'good' bittorrent client with Centos5.1? -- Thanks

Hi, Thanks for the reply. Mohan Sundaram wrote : > mark in iptables and use tc to classify using mark. Mark like this ? iptables -A INPUT -m layer7 --l7proto bittorrent -j MARK --set-mark 3 and then.. tc filter add dev eth0 protocol ip parent 1:0 1 handle 3 fw flowid 1:10 and lets say we have a flowid 1:3 declared to use at 60kbit ceil 60kbit Is that proper ? If so then it

>Isn't that a KDE-specific program? Yes, it's from kde. >Works with Gnome as well? All kde programs work in all desktop managers provided that you install the required libraries. The same is true for gnome programs. LEC ----- Reply message ----- From: "Sorin Srbu" <Sorin.Srbu at orgfarm.uu.se> To: "Centos" <centos at centos.org> Subject: [CentOS]

>Hey, ktorrent looks pretty good! >Thanks for the hint! Maybe it's time to give KDE a second look :) LEC

Oh, well, there's no coulmns I can find to show various speed, trackers used, remaining time, ot able to sort on name, speed etc. Basically it's the gui I don't like. It's fine otherwise and does its job excellent. -- /Sorin ________________________________________ From: centos-bounces at centos.org [centos-bounces at centos.org] on behalf of Jeff Allison [jeff.allison at

Hi all, I''m tring to isolate P2P traffic, specifically BitTorrent, for my QoS scripts. I can''t seem to completely isolate ALL BitTorrent traffic. I identify & mark packets and then use tc filters to put them into appropriate classes. My firewall rules (below) do the markings. My VoIP boxes'' and ICMP traffic get highest priority (mark 1). Then comes DNS, SSH,

Ok, earlier I post a message explaining my problem with HTB and layer7 (or ipp2p), about not being able to shape the traffic. Well, actually this is what''s happening, I''m marking the packets (right now, I''m using ipp2p as Klaus adviced me to) with iptables, and my queue rules are made using tcng, I''m using the HTB qdisc, and traffic is going to the HTB class