similar to: Simple streamer help

John "Static files (http support) There is support in icecast for streaming files directory from the server to the client. This is usually handled much more nicely by a real http server, but if you don't want to go through the hassle of setting up apache or roxen or whatever, then this might be what you're looking for. All files must end in .mp3, and they must all be in the file

Following up on myself because I just realized I may be barking up the wrong tree; if so I apologize for the bandwidth, but would still love it if someone could point me in the right direction. After reading through the mailing list archives, I think that icecast may not be the solution I'm looking for, because I'm hoping to somehow play the mp3s on demand from the web browser, not

Thanks, Tim. The unit was available with single as well as split phase output, and from the data I can find the input was single phase, though the input connector has L1/L2/N/G wires. I'm digging through the MIB to see what the raw data looks like. Thanks! John ---- On 11/11/24 19:14, Tim Dawson wrote: > Sounds pretty normal from what I see. It appears that this is *NOT* a > true

John Ackermann N8UR via Nut-upsuser <nut-upsuser at alioth-lists.debian.net> writes: > I am monitoring via the SNMP driver an APC SmartUPS that has split > phase (2L + neutral) 240V input and 120/120 volt outputs. The data > for the voltages is not what I'm expecting, and I am wondering how I > should interpret it. Wow, that sounds kind of industrial. Model? Is the

Hi -- I am monitoring via the SNMP driver an APC SmartUPS that has split phase (2L + neutral) 240V input and 120/120 volt outputs. The data for the voltages is not what I'm expecting, and I am wondering how I should interpret it. Here is an example from upsc: input.L1-L2.voltage: 121 input.L2-L3.voltage: 120 input.voltage: 121.20 output.current: 5.90 output.L1-L2.voltage: 119

Sounds pretty normal from what I see. It appears that this is *NOT* a true 240v UPS, but rather one that provides two legs of 120v output from two legs of 120 input, and what is seen as "L2" is actually neutral, and the line names are reporting incorrectly. With that in mind, each leg in should be 120v, as well as the outputs, which is exactly what you are seeing.(The fact tht L1 to L3

I have a small home network running three Win95 pcs with a Samba/Linux server (thanks, Andrew and Linus!!!). All works well. The question now is what I can do to make a full system backup (including hidden and system files) from the Win95 boxes to the 8mm tape drive on the Linux box. I know I could use smbmount to mount the Win95 drive, and then do a tar or cpio backup, but I'm not nearly

I am trying to run a Win32 application, Stable32, under wine. This application does analysis of numeric data files and can plot the data to the screen. When it does this, it opens a new window for the plot. Under wine, the application starts just fine and the basic functions seem to work, but every time I try to use one of the plot functions, the application crashes. This is the message it

Hi! I'm trying to run "llc" tool on files from "test" subdirectory of LLVM root. I compile source files with the following line: llvm-gcc -c -ocompiled.o ackermann.c Then I run llc like the following: llc compiled.o which outputs llc: bytecode didn't read correctly (I mean, I try it with different options but even the default ones aint working) My llvm-gcc

Hi all i took a look into LLVM benchmarks from nightly tester and ran Shootout tests on my own. Below go just few outlines. 1. results on my AMD AthlonXP and Xeon used by LLVM team are different sometime. In particular, both Shootout and Shootout-C++ show great speed up with LLVM (in comparison to GCC) on ackerman test on my AthlonXP. But here:

Hi, I don't understand how works the multi stream api in opus. I need to send two mono streams over network with RTP. I think I'm right when I create an OpusMsDecoder with opus_multistream_decoder_create (48000, 2, 2 ,0 ,mapping, NULL) where mapping is: unsigned char mapping[2] = {0,1} isn't it ? Next, i need to encode data which I get from jack (float) so I use

Hi, I have recently moved the clang-native-arm-lnt-perf bot from the nt producer to the test-suite producer. It seems to be working fine but it doesn't manage to submit the results to http://lnt.llvm.org/submitRun. If you scroll down to the bottom of [1], you can see this error message: 2017-08-28 07:06:32: submitting result to 'http://lnt.llvm.org/submitRun' error: lnt server:

Great, good to know it's not just a problem with our bot. Thanks! On 28 August 2017 at 16:24, Chris Matthews <cmatthews5 at apple.com> wrote: > Hi Diana, > > I have seen that issue on some other bots too. I will fix it this week. It is something about how MySQL treats character encodings differently than Postgres. We are checking for the value in the table beforehand, and this

Hello! I've got a problem with DNS,VPN and SAMBA. I do have 3 Linux servers on distinct subnets. (192.168.1.1 ,192.168.2.1 and 192.168.3.1). I have done a VPN between the 3 subnets and I could do a ping from 192.168.1.1 to the others without problems. Each sever has 2 network cards. One of them is connected to ADSL.

I have just switched from Beryl to compiz, as it seems to be much more stable. The only think, that I'm missing is, that scale just shows the open applications of the current viewport instead of all on all viewports. Is there an option in gconf I can tick to enable this or is it simply not implemented ans only a hack in beryl-scale? regards Peter Ackermann

I'm using gandalfn's ubuntu-dev-pakages. I had this bug on beryl before. If I set a custom shortcut for scale (in my case I want to initiate all viewports on the default shortcut <ctrl><alt>Up), initiate_edge is automaticaly set to TopRight, too. The Problem is, I don't want to use the active edges at all. So I go everytime into gconf-editor, remove TopRight from

Update: in that same block of 10,000 LLVM/Clang revisions, this the number of distinct SHA1 hashes for the binaries of the following benchmarks: 7 MultiSource/Applications/aha/aha 2 MultiSource/Benchmarks/BitBench/drop3/drop3 10 MultiSource/Benchmarks/BitBench/five11/five11 7 MultiSource/Benchmarks/BitBench/uudecode/uudecode 3 MultiSource/Benchmarks/BitBench/uuencode/uuencode 5

LLVMers, The LLVM 1.9 Prerelease is available for testing: http://llvm.org/prereleases/1.9/ If anyone can spare some time, please download the appropriate tarballs for your platform and test the release (at least with make check). I'd also appreciate any documentation reviews. Please note that llvm-gcc3 on x86 may not have a clean dejagnu run. You should see one XPASS for

Hi Tanya, Here's my second attempt on Fedora Core 5. The changes this time are: 1. Using GCC 4.0.3 as the compiler 2. Building everything from source (no pre-built binaries used) BUILD LLVM WITH GCC 4.0.3 * No issues, just the usual warnings. BUILD LLVM-GCC WITH GCC 4.0.3 * No issues RUN LLVM-TEST WITH GCC 4.0.3 * The following failures were encountered. Some of them are

Tanya, Here's the results for GNU/Linux, 2.6.18-1.2200.fc5smp (Fedora Core 5) HIGH LEVEL COMMENTS * The llvm-1.9.tar.gz file unpacks to a dir named "llvm". Shouldn't that be llvm-1.9? * LLVM was built in Release mode in all cases * I don't think this is ready for release. In particular the llvm-gcc4 binary seg faults on FC 5 for most of llvm-test programs. *