similar to: Its my first time installing icecast...and i'm having problems

Displaying 20 results from an estimated 6000 matches similar to: "Its my first time installing icecast...and i'm having problems"

2004 Aug 06
2
Its my first time installing icecast...and i'm having problems
Both ports are enabled. Here is the actual ouput, maybe someone can make more sense of it. This is what happens when I try to stream (note that the encoder has been accepted the line before): -> [13/Dec/2001:13:46:42] [Bandwidth: 0.000000MB/s] [Sources: 0] [Clients: 0] [Admins: 1] [Uptime: 1 seconds] -> [13/Dec/2001:13:47:35] Accepted encoder on mountpoint /icy_0 from
2004 Aug 06
0
Its my first time installing icecast...and i'm havi ng problems
> -----Original Message----- > From: dj epyon [mailto:dj-epyon@home.net] > Sent: 13 December 2001 21:55 > To: icecast@xiph.org > Subject: Re: [icecast] Its my first time installing icecast...and i'm > having problems > > This is what happens when I try to log into the admin: > -> [13/Dec/2001:13:52:41] [Bandwidth: 0.000000MB/s] [Sources: > 1] [Clients: >
2004 Aug 06
2
Icecast admin interface
I have a problem with Icecast web admin interface. My icecast.conf file contains : acl_policy 1 deny all * allow all *.via.ecp.fr When connecting to my admin interface, I get a 403 error message ( You don't have access to this entity (stream or file).), and icecast says "Kicking unknown 48 [mallet.via.ecp.fr] [No mountfile found], connected for 0 seconds". There is no firewall
2004 Aug 06
2
Another problem...
Okay, now.. I've got it compiled and running (thanks by the way to Moritz and Akos). Using WinAMP 2.81 and the latest build of oddcastDSP i've got it streaming happilly to the server with the server happilly accepting the stream. Now, however whenever anybody tries connecting to the server it automatically kicks them off ie.. -> [26/Aug/2002:23:56:43] Accepted client 4 from
2004 Aug 06
0
no idea of mountfile[No mountfile found, refusing access to WWW admin for...]
Hi, I'm trying to get icecast to work but opening the webadmin interface results in this: [31/Dec/2002:14:24:58] [4:Connection Handler] No mountfile found, refusing access to WWW admin for 192.168.0.3 [31/Dec/2002:14:24:58] [4:Connection Handler] Kicking unknown 0 [192.168.0.3] [No mountfile found], connected for 0 seconds What is this mountfile for, and how do i have to generate ist?
2004 Aug 06
3
More questions!
Thanks but I'm looking for something I can run under Red Hat 7.2. Should have made that more clear. Any other suggestions? -Ian > From: "Kevin McNeece" <kmcneece3@attbi.com> > Reply-To: icecast@xiph.org > Date: Fri, 14 Dec 2001 12:48:52 -0700 > To: <icecast@xiph.org> > Subject: Re: [icecast] More questions! > > Hello Ian, > > I am new to
2013 Nov 04
2
Is UPSD necessary for average users?
On Wed, 16 Oct 2013 08:19:11 +0100 Chris Boot <bootc at bootc.net> wrote: > >> > I forgot to mention: by default, NUT listens on localhost. If > >> > you are using Linux, you could add a "-m owner --uid-owner" rule > >> > to iptables to only match the UID for the NUT system user. > > > > Thanks; if it listens on localhost by default,
2004 Aug 06
2
More questions!
Hey thanks for your help guys. I got everything working. I've got a few other questions though. I want to have a dj/station type script or program to cycle through mp3's and play a call sign mp3 every certain # of songs. Whats the best program to do this? There's a few i've seen on freshmeat.net but i'm unsure of which to use. Also, I want to do a live broadcast once a week.
2004 Aug 06
3
&quot;Bind to socket failed&quot;
I'm running RedHat 7.2 (kernel 2.4.17) on a PII 300. I'm using Liveice with XMMS. I had no problem broadcasting with Shoutcast and Winamp back before I switched over to Linux. I'd love to get going on broadcasting... but Icecast refusing to open is a problem. Running icecast gives me the following. Starting thread engine... [04/Feb/2002:13:57:38] Icecast Version 1.3.10 Starting..
2002 Nov 12
7
Switching to another Samba server
I've been running Samba 2.2.2 for a while as a domain controller on my mostly Windows network. It's been working great up to this point. Anyway, I just put together a new Linux server and installed 2.2.2 on it as well. I copied the conf file and pretty much mirrored everything on the existing server, changed the paths and the "workgroup" field in the conf file to match the new
2004 Aug 06
2
Admin question[s]
David Dennis wrote: > welcome to the list. > > Check the archives. > > There you will find about one newbie a month minimum discovering that the > widely distributed and still available shout package version 0.8.0 > is actually deprecated and highly broken in exactly the manner you > describe. > > Thanks but one point I can make is I get the same results when not
2004 Aug 06
5
Missing headers in Icecast2
Hi Karl, Thanks for your help, About the "Connection:" header, you are right, it's: "Connection: close" and NOT "Connection: keep-alive". The protocol when the SERVER sends the data is http 1.0. It's http 1.1 when the browser requests the data. I don't understand the "Content-Length: 54000000" header either. Also I noticed the flash player on
2004 Aug 06
0
Icecast admin interface
On Tue, May 21, 2002 at 06:43:09PM +0200, Cédric Mallet wrote: > I have a problem with Icecast web admin interface. > My icecast.conf file contains : > acl_policy 1 > deny all * > allow all *.via.ecp.fr > > When connecting to my admin interface, I get a 403 error message ( You don't > have access to this entity (stream or file).), and icecast says "Kicking >
2004 Aug 06
0
problem remotely loginning into web admin interface
*This message was transferred with a trial version of CommuniGate(tm) Pro* Here are the steps I've taken to open access to the web admin interface for icecast. If anyone can find mistakes I have made or a step I have left out please let me know. I have been unable to access the interface. In my hosts.allow I have... ALL: *.mydomain.com In my hosts.deny I have... ALL: ALL icecast_admin: ALL
2004 Aug 06
2
&quot;No Encoder&quot;?
Hi guys! Thanks to your help I've my IceCast/LiveIce server up & running but I´m still having problems: My IceCast server is on the internal LAN and it's NAT'ed behind an OpenBSD IPF firewall. Here's my network setup: Internet ---- [OpenBSD firewall] ---- hub ---- [IceCast server] | | +
2004 Aug 06
2
Liveice problem with Icecast 1.3.12
OK...since Liveice doesn't support Icecast 2 I've set up an Icecast 1.3.12 server. <p>When I run Liveice I still get the problem: ------------------------------------------------------- /local/liveice/temp.playlist ...... done setup_pipes()... Initialising pipes for stream 0 Successfuly set up fifo .liveice_temp_files/raw.pipe0 Successfuly set up fifo
2004 Aug 06
2
&quot;Bind to socket failed&quot;
On Mon, 4 Feb 2002, Jack Moffitt wrote: > > I'm running RedHat 7.2 (kernel 2.4.17) on a PII 300. I'm using Liveice > > with XMMS. I had no problem broadcasting with Shoutcast and Winamp back > > before I switched over to Linux. I'd love to get going on broadcasting... > > but Icecast refusing to open is a problem. > > Did you use the hostname parameter in
2004 Aug 06
3
&quot;No Encoder&quot;?
Hi! Sorry! I forget to mention that port 8001 it's open at the firewall too. So winamp should work fine with this configuration. Thanks anyway Kurt! Any other ideas? Marcelo Gulin <p>-----Original Message----- From: owner-icecast@xiph.org [mailto:owner-icecast@xiph.org] On Behalf Of Kurt J. Dreistadt Sent: Miércoles, 10 de Abril de 2002 06:43 a.m. To: icecast@xiph.org Subject: Re:
2013 Oct 16
0
Is UPSD necessary for average users?
On 16/10/13 06:40, David N Melik wrote: > On Tue, 15 Oct 2013 21:56:16 -0400 > Charles Lepple <clepple at gmail.com> wrote: >>>> > >> What are you trying to optimize? >>> > > >>> > > nothing, but I just did not want another daemon running, or at >>> > > least I do not want a port open that can access the UPS, because I
2013 Oct 16
2
Is UPSD necessary for average users?
On Tue, 15 Oct 2013 21:56:16 -0400 Charles Lepple <clepple at gmail.com> wrote: > >> What are you trying to optimize? > > > > nothing, but I just did not want another daemon running, or at > > least I do not want a port open that can access the UPS, because I > > will not be using it; it is more of a minor security issue than > > anything. The