similar to: DNAT problem

Displaying 20 results from an estimated 10000 matches similar to: "DNAT problem"

2017 Oct 17
0
gfid entries in volume heal info that do not heal
Attached is the heal log for the volume as well as the shd log. >> Run these commands on all the bricks of the replica pair to get the attrs set on the backend. [root at tpc-cent-glus1-081017 ~]# getfattr -d -e hex -m . /exp/b1/gv0/.glusterfs/10/86/108694db-c039-4b7c-bd3d-ad6a15d811a2 getfattr: Removing leading '/' from absolute path names # file:
2017 Oct 18
1
gfid entries in volume heal info that do not heal
Hey Matt, >From the xattr output, it looks like the files are not present on the arbiter brick & needs healing. But on the parent it does not have the pending markers set for those entries. The workaround for this is you need to do a lookup on the file which needs heal from the mount, so it will create the entry on the arbiter brick and then run the volume heal to do the healing. Follow
2012 Feb 21
7
samba 3.5.6 as PDC & LDAP - roaming profile problem
Hi all; for few weeks I'm trying to implement a new samba PDC server for my school. It is based on debian squeeze and samba 3.5.6 with lDAP backend. I was able to join a computer into domain, LDAP is working, mapping home drive for users also. It seems that almost all works good but with one exeption. The one thing which is broken is roaming profile support. When user is logging into domain
2017 Oct 16
0
gfid entries in volume heal info that do not heal
OK, so here?s my output of the volume info and the heal info. I have not yet tracked down physical location of these files, any tips to finding them would be appreciated, but I?m definitely just wanting them gone. I forgot to mention earlier that the cluster is running 3.12 and was upgraded from 3.10; these files were likely stuck like this when it was on 3.10. [root at tpc-cent-glus1-081017 ~]#
2017 Oct 23
0
gfid entries in volume heal info that do not heal
Hi Jim & Matt, Can you also check for the link count in the stat output of those hardlink entries in the .glusterfs folder on the bricks. If the link count is 1 on all the bricks for those entries, then they are orphaned entries and you can delete those hardlinks. To be on the safer side have a backup before deleting any of the entries. Regards, Karthik On Fri, Oct 20, 2017 at 3:18 AM, Jim
2017 Oct 19
2
gfid entries in volume heal info that do not heal
I've been following this particular thread as I have a similar issue (RAID6 array failed out with 3 dead drives at once while a 12 TB load was being copied into one mounted space - what a mess) I have >700K GFID entries that have no path data:Example:getfattr -d -e hex -m . .glusterfs/00/00/0000a5ef-5af7-401b-84b5-ff2a51c10421# file: .glusterfs/00/00/0000a5ef-5af7-401b-84b5-
2017 Oct 23
2
gfid entries in volume heal info that do not heal
In my case I was able to delete the hard links in the .glusterfs folders of the bricks and it seems to have done the trick, thanks! From: Karthik Subrahmanya [mailto:ksubrahm at redhat.com] Sent: Monday, October 23, 2017 1:52 AM To: Jim Kinney <jim.kinney at gmail.com>; Matt Waymack <mwaymack at nsgdv.com> Cc: gluster-users <Gluster-users at gluster.org> Subject: Re:
2010 Feb 05
6
Kernel unaligned access at TPC[10101f18] btrfs_csum_final+0x38/0x60
When writing to a newly created btrfs (vanilla 2.6.33-rc6, sparc64) the following messages are printed: [28617.650231] Kernel unaligned access at TPC[10101f18] btrfs_csum_final+0x38/0x60 [btrfs] [28617.745783] Kernel unaligned access at TPC[10101f18] btrfs_csum_final+0x38/0x60 [btrfs] [28654.589492] Kernel unaligned access at TPC[10101f18] btrfs_csum_final+0x38/0x60 [btrfs] [28654.685036] Kernel
2017 Oct 23
0
gfid entries in volume heal info that do not heal
I'm not so lucky. ALL of mine show 2 links and none have the attr data that supplies the path to the original. I have the inode from stat. Looking now to dig out the path/filename from xfs_db on the specific inodes individually. Is the hash of the filename or <path>/filename and if so relative to where? /, <path from top of brick>, ? On Mon, 2017-10-23 at 18:54 +0000, Matt Waymack
2017 Oct 24
0
gfid entries in volume heal info that do not heal
I have 14,734 GFIDS that are different. All the different ones are only on the brick that was live during the outage and concurrent file copy- in. The brick that was down at that time has no GFIDs that are not also on the up brick. As the bricks are 10TB, the find is going to be a long running process. I'm running several finds at once with gnu parallel but it will still take some time.
2005 Jan 02
1
Dnat problems with adsl-box
Hello! So i got this problem. I have a debian sarge (with 2.6 kernel) box with shorewall up and network something like this: (net-ip)adsl-router(10.0.0.2)->(10.0.0.5)debian(192.168.0.1)->(192.168.0.x)lan-machines Everything works just great but i cant get port forwarding to work. shorewall show nat shows the traffic (to port 2002) but the machine (192.168.0.3) isnt getting it.. I have
2017 Oct 24
3
gfid entries in volume heal info that do not heal
Hi Jim, Can you check whether the same hardlinks are present on both the bricks & both of them have the link count 2? If the link count is 2 then "find <brickpath> -samefile <brickpath/.glusterfs/<first two bits of gfid>/<next 2 bits of gfid>/<full gfid>" should give you the file path. Regards, Karthik On Tue, Oct 24, 2017 at 3:28 AM, Jim Kinney
2017 Oct 17
3
gfid entries in volume heal info that do not heal
Hi Matt, Run these commands on all the bricks of the replica pair to get the attrs set on the backend. On the bricks of first replica set: getfattr -d -e hex -m . <brick path>/.glusterfs/10/86/ 108694db-c039-4b7c-bd3d-ad6a15d811a2 On the fourth replica set: getfattr -d -e hex -m . <brick path>/.glusterfs/ e0/c5/e0c56bf7-8bfe-46ca-bde1-e46b92d33df3 Also run the "gluster volume
2004 Aug 06
2
DNAT problem
Hello, I have a problem. I have a webserver/firewall/internet gateway machine with shorewall. The local network is masquerated. I am trying to get all packets coming from the internal network with the destination 133.211.9.10 on ports 80 and 110 (my external interface) to be redirected to the internal interface (192.168.9.2). My local network is 192.168.1.0/24. Thank you
2005 Jan 02
1
Linksys router and shorewall
I''m not a subscribed user, so please cc me on any replies (fier0@bigfoot.com). I know this has been asked a few times, but i have not been able to find a direct answer. I was using shorewall with 2 nics, and it worked fine, except if that linux box went down then nobody could get out to the internet (and the wife would kick my ass). I''ve now started to use my linksys
2024 Jan 21
1
Provisioning new AD Domain Controller
On Sat Jan 20 16:28:14 2024 Rowland Penny via samba <samba at lists.samba.org> wrote: > > On Sat, 20 Jan 2024 15:44:18 -0500 > Mark Foley via samba <samba at lists.samba.org> wrote: > > > After provisioning and testing my new DC offline, I now want to move > > it into production. This means changing IPs. > > > > DC FQDN: mail.hprs.local > >
2004 Jan 08
5
Dialing the Phone from OS X Address Book with AppleScript, XML-RPC, PHP and Asterisk
I run an Apple OS X workstation and I've got a server on the same LAN that's both a webserver and an Asterisk PBX. I wanted to be able to originate calls in the OS X Address Book application, and have Asterisk dial them and connect them to the phone on my desk. I've assembled a system that uses AppleScript to connect, via XML-RPC, to a web application that, in turn, connects to
2004 Oct 17
1
DNAT not working anymore
Heya guys and gals, I had a shorewall 1.4.x running on my router and somehow it decided to stop working. I didn''t really change something, it just stopped working really. Anyway, here the info that is asked for on the support page at first: # shorewall version 2.0.9 # ip addr show 1: lo: <LOOPBACK,UP> mtu 16436 qdisc noqueue link/loopback 00:00:00:00:00:00 brd
2004 Oct 11
1
DNAT e.g. port 80 to different hosts
Hi, just cracking my head how to solve this: Firewall has more than one public IP Address and NET/LOC/DMZ configured. Requests on public 1.1.1.2:80 should go to dmz:192.168.0.1:80 Requests on public 1.1.1.3:80 should go to dmz:192.168.0.2:80 How can I manage that with DNAT? I tried it with the original destination, but keep getting "REFUSED" always for one connection. Thx Andy
2005 Jan 24
3
MYSQL bechmark results on XEN and NFS
I am trying to setup mysql on XEN. I need to set it up on NFS so I can migrate the domain when needed. I am getting unexpected results and wanted to get some feedback. Here is my setup: NFS server Dual 2.0 Ghz AMD Opteron 2GB of RAM Broadcom GB NIC Standard Fedora Core 3 (FC3) Mysql w/tpc-c medium databases on the NFS share XenU filesystem on the NFS share Xen machine