Displaying 20 results from an estimated 3000 matches similar to: "DHCP assigned gateway in /etc/shorewall/providers?"
2005 Mar 08
1
samba WINS problem on 2 networked LANS using a VPN connection
Hello Samba experts,
Please read all email because i'm desperate!!!!!
I have problem on joining to LAN-s using Samba. Finally i got a solution to
"see" booth workgroups on "Entire Network", but i'm having problem with
stations located in LAN2. From any station located in LAN1, I can see LAN2
workgroup and the browse list with stations located in LAN2, but when
2010 Dec 12
3
weird fail with conversion to bridges?
I''m converting my network from a "one interface per segment" to a
"single connection with vlans", well, some hardware I have requires
using different vlan IDs. suffice it to say I need bridges to connect a
few different vlans that should all be one but can''t be because of
firmware constraints. so my first step is to get shorewall to know
about bridges.
2005 Mar 02
12
Problem with outgoing Masquerade
I''m having another little problem with my new firewall. I want outgoing port
25 from my mail server to appear on the address 65.223.121.227 so I created
the file masq:
eth2 192.168.124.18 65.223.121.227 tcp 25
eth1 eth5
eth1 eth3
eth1 eth4
eth1 == net0 == 209.189.103.196/27
eth2 == net1 == 65.223.121.237/28
eth3 == dmz0
eth4 == dmz1
eth5 == loc ==
2005 Jun 06
23
Multi-ISP in 2.4.0
Hello Shorewall list,
I''m a happy Shorewall user since a few years now and everything works fine
for me except one thing that I try to implement since a week, the multi-isp.
I''ve downloaded the 2.4.0 Stable release yesterday and tried the RC2 since a
week.
My config is a Debian running a kernel 2.4.27 home made with the
CONNMARK.diff patch applied
I''m using 2 ISP,
2007 Oct 20
3
bridge or vlan
Hello to everyone,
Here is the situation:
[LAN1]---[eth3]/----------\
| LinuxBR |[eth2]---[LAN0]---[linuxGW]---[internet]
[LAN2]---[eth4]\----------/
Whole LAN is in subnet 10.0.0.0/24.
So I need:
LAN0, LAN1, LAN2 could not see each other.
LAN0, LAN1, LAN2 is in same subnet (10.0.0.0/24).
All LANs have to get only internet.
How can I configure LinuxBR to do so?
2017 Sep 11
1
Will couple of packets drop when in-frequent traffic go through tinc?
An very interesting test did yesterday that, LAN1 and LAN2 setup an tinc VPN which is quite simple(the physical link between tinc nodes are quite stable/fast), and no any application traffic to go through the tinc.
Later, I setup smokeping which LAN1 initial 20 ping to LAN2 on a per-minute basis, but as you saw from the below picture, it had packet drop. But if I perform a constantly ping from
2002 Oct 30
1
sticky bit, etc.
I have a question about samba and sticky bits. I have a share with the
following configuration:
[documents]
comment = documents
path = /shares/documents
public = no
writeable = yes
printable = no
valid users = @lan1
force user = docadmin
force group = lan1
create mode = 0440
force create mode = 0440
directory mode = 1770
force directory mode = 1770
delete read only = no
2007 Aug 02
5
Allocating 64 kbits/s out of 256 kbits/s for one LAN behing firewall
Hi,
We have a 256 kbits/s (kilobits per second) link to the internet. it is a
router running Linux that belongs to our ISP. They have given us 8 internet
ips. (i.e- subnet is 255.255.255.248). one has been given to this router. I
have given another internet ip to the firewall running CentOS 4.5. iptables
is running on it. And also, I have installed iproute2 pkg as well.
pls see below for
2004 Oct 18
1
Beginer question
Hi, list members.
I''ve been reading a lot about traffic control because
at work we have the following configuration......
LINUX
BOX
_____
100 mbit | |
LAN1--------------|eth0 |
| | 2 mbit SDSL
| eth1|-------------------INTERNET
100 mbit | |
LAN2--------------|eth2 |
| |
-------
The linux box (REDHAT 9-2.4.20-30.9) acts as a firewall-NAT
solution for both
2005 May 03
1
Shorewall router behind Shorewall firewall
Dear Friends,
I have been using shorewall for some years.
I want to set up "shorewall 2" router behind firewall,
accordind to this picture:
I have lost at setuping "zone"-s (wifi, lan1, net).
Plese help me !
Thanks, psw
net
|
|
SHOREWALL 1 ------- lan 1
|
|
|wifi
|
|
SHOREWALL 2 ------- lan 2
|
---------------- lan 3
2007 Apr 18
1
[Bridge] Freezing bridges
I have the following situation:
A Linux 2.4.22 server:
Physical ethernet:
lan1 - Ethernet port (Internet)
lan2 - Ethernet port (Cisco Switch, Trunk port)
Tunnel:
tap1 - OpenVPN in tcp-server mode
VLAN's:
lan2.201
lan2.202
lan2.203
tap1.201
tap1.202
tap1.203
Bridges:
br201 (lan2.201, tap1.201)
br202 (lan2.202, tap1.202)
br203 (lan2.203, tap1.203)
On the other end, the same type of server:
2005 May 10
3
Interconnecting two lans using Asterisk over a PSTN
Hello,
I am a newbie in Asterisk IP PBX but I am very impressed by its
functionalities.
I have read that It can work over IP network and across the PSTN.
I am not very sure how it works over the PSTN..
In case if people have not yet the Internet or SDL access, I would like just to
know if it is possible to interconnect two IP LANs using the traditionnal
analog Network and Asterisk PBX? In such I
2008 Mar 31
3
arp who-has packets not seen in Dom0 even by tcpdump
Hi all,
I''m running Xen-3.2 and linux-image-2.6.18 as Dom0 kernel on a VT-x
processor. The problem is that broadcast arp who-has packets are not
seen in Dom0 kernel. I''ve tried both precompiled debian kernel and
compiled latest one from sources as described at
http://lists.xensource.com/archives/html/xen-users/2008-01/msg00699.html
There is no linux bridge invoked,
2005 Jun 27
2
RTNETLINK answers: File exists
Hi List,
I am new at this and trying to set up shorewall.
I was using mnf-en to do it but it was using an old version of shorewall
(shorewall-2.0.8-2mdk) and didn''t have the features I wanted. So I''ve
installed shorewall-2.4.0-1mdk.
Other bits of interest:
iproute2-2.6.10-1mdk
iptables-1.2.9-8mdk
I''m trying to get the providers feature working.
show capabilities:
2023 Mar 30
2
[Bridge] [PATCH v2 net-next 6/6] selftests: forwarding: add dynamic FDB test
On Thu, Mar 30, 2023 at 09:07:53PM +0200, Hans Schultz wrote:
> Not true, it reveals that I forgot to put it in the patch, that's all. As
> I cannot run several of these tests because of memory constraints I link
> the file to a copy in a rw area where I modify the list and just run one
> of the subtests at a time. If I try to run the whole it always fails
> after a couple of
2005 Feb 10
5
priorizing vlans in a bridge
Hi, this is my Linux Box
----------------------------
LAN 1 -----|--eth1 <---br1--->eth0.1 |
| \ |
| eth0--|----- 802.1q tagged 1 Mbps link
| / |
LAN 2 -----|--eth2 <---br2--->eth0.2 |
----------------------------
I have to bridge the 2 lans
2005 Mar 01
3
Problem with multiple ISP''s
I have a setup with two Internet providers. One circuit (net0 == eth1) is
used primarily for employees and tunnels to other sites. The other (net1 ==
eth2) is for the production machines that customers access. Everythung works
in teh sense that packets get to where they are sent (mostly) but I recently
I had a sniffer on the system and noticed a problem I cannot solve. traffic
coming in
2005 Jul 04
4
setting gateway in interfaces file
I tried to the new GATEWAY option in
/etc/shorewal/interfaces file but it didnt work. My
network setting consists of 2 ISPs line and i would
like to have eth0 to connect to for example,
192.168.15.254 while eth1 connected to 192.168.33.254.
I restarted shorewall and nothing is wrong. However,
the traffic still goes to the default gateway as shown
in "route -n" command. For example, i
2005 Jun 29
5
Dual-ISP Masq
I know this is a FAQ and that it''s been discussed much before, I''m just
looking for a few key things.
I need to setup our gateway so that traffic FROM a range of IPs is sent
out, masqueraded, via a new cable connection.
I''m running 2.6.9.
Am I going to require any of the CONNMARK patches or other patches from
http://www.ssi.bg/~ja/#routes? I''m really not sure
2007 Feb 09
0
Routing / NAT for Multi Subnet Router
Hi,
I have a linux system which is router between several subnets (each also a
different segment), in total 3 different lans, 2 dmz, and 4 internet
connections, my default FORWARD policy is DROP, here is a simplified example
of my config with only two lan segments and internet connection:
Allow forwarding between lans
-A FORWARD -s lan1/mask -j ACCEPT
-A FORWARD -d lan1/mask -j ACCEPT
-A