similar to: Bitkeeper refusing entry

Jack Moffitt wrote: > > > 3. I searched the mailing list archive, and got a pointer to > > http://i.cantcode.com/~jack/ where there are some old snapshots > > Funny how you found that, but not this: > > http://i.cantcode.com/~jack/icecast.html was looking for .tar.gz, as the e-mail mentioned snapshots. seems like I was shortsited. > >Wouldn't it be nice if

Why do I have a couple hundred copies of this email? Are others on the list getting multiple copies? I've gotten a copy every hour and 20 minutes since 4/5. They're being sent from the listserver too: Received: from motherfish.xiph.org (olive-22.wheatrick.com [207.181.249.22]) by mspexch1.office.mktw.net with SMTP (Microsoft Exchange Internet Mail Service Version 5.5.2653.13) id

While we wait, could someone quote the new IP number please. Michael Smith wrote: > vorbis.com is not down, but the servers were recently moved to a new > provider - your DNS may not have updated yet. --- >8 ---- List archives: http://www.xiph.org/archives/ Ogg project homepage: http://www.xiph.org/ogg/ To unsubscribe from this list, send a message to

To all users: The recently exploits announced at bugtraq can be fixed by the following patch. This patch should fix a few other potential holes as well, and I will post a followup patch soon that is even more thorough. Note: this exploit would give the attacker priviledges of the user running icecast. If you are running icecast as a normal user account or as root, this would be a good time to

To all users: The recently exploits announced at bugtraq can be fixed by the following patch. This patch should fix a few other potential holes as well, and I will post a followup patch soon that is even more thorough. Note: this exploit would give the attacker priviledges of the user running icecast. If you are running icecast as a normal user account or as root, this would be a good time to

I'm not getting copies of it, so I don't think it's going to the entire list. Is your mailserver accepting mail, but saying it's down? Are you getting copies of other messages? I suppose this could be a result of the mailservers's moving. Can anyone else confirm that they do or do not get copies of emails every 20 minutes? If it's just you, then it will help track it

Ross Lewis wrote: >I don't know where you are but where I am it's 2002. Gah! I must have been seeing things while looking at the whois info.. Thanks for pointing out. :) I was figuring out why vorbis.com has not resolved lately as it should have been and somehow I fixated on the expire dates.. Anyway, despite my eyes, the fact remains that vorbis.com has problems resolving. Primary

please I need a help look this error when i type #winecfg > > shredder at shredder-laptop:~$ winecfg > err:module:import_dll Library shell32.dll (which is needed by L"C:\\windows\\system32\\winemenubuilder.exe") not found > err:module:LdrInitializeThunk Main exe initialization for L"C:\\windows\\system32\\winemenubuilder.exe" failed, status c0000135 >

Hi. I am trying to boot Xen 2.0.5 on an HP DL380 G3. It won''t. The box has an "HP Smart Array 5i" that when running normal Linux is handled by the CCISS driver. I suspect that this is what is not supported in the stock Xen kernel. Am I correct that I need to build a kernel from source ? According to http://lists.xensource.com/archives/html/xen-devel/2004-11/msg00709.html there

John R Pierce wrote: > On 5/31/2017 10:13 AM, m.roth at 5-cent.us wrote: >> If I had realized it would run this long, I would have used DBAN.... For >> single drives, I do, and choose DoD 5220.22-M (seven passes), which is >> *way* overkill these days... but I sign my name to a certificate that >> gets stuck on the outside of the server, meaning I, personally, am

Hi, I''m currently writing a Rails app, in a repository controlled by BitKeeper. BitKeeper creates files, in the sub-directories it controls, so for source file yyy.zzz in Directory XXX it saves a file called s.yyy.zzz in subdirectory XXX/SCCS. When these files are created in config/initializers, rails tries to load them when it is run (as they retain the .rb extension). So my question

If you only run released (rather than development) versions of rsync then you can skip this message. rsync's source tree has been converted from CVS to BitKeeper. This message contains brief instructions for people who want to track development or make contributions. I think it should take about 30-60 minutes to get started with BK. I hope you will agree that it is worthwhile. First

The BitKeeper repository has been taken down, and all the code moved into CVS. While BitKeeper is a superior source management tool to CVS in many ways, it lacks in one important way, Freedom. With the recent change to their license, taking away more of our freedoms, I felt it was time to go back to CVS. All the code has been imported into the xiph.org CVS repository. I'll try to revise

The BitKeeper repository has been taken down, and all the code moved into CVS. While BitKeeper is a superior source management tool to CVS in many ways, it lacks in one important way, Freedom. With the recent change to their license, taking away more of our freedoms, I felt it was time to go back to CVS. All the code has been imported into the xiph.org CVS repository. I'll try to revise

Hi, I''m writing an RoR application on a source-control system Bitkeeper. for each source file yyy.zzz in Directory XXX it saves a file called x.yyy.zzz in subdirectory XXX/SCCS. when I try to run ''rake test_unit'' it also tries to execute the files of the bitkeeper as unit tests, which of course fails. Is there a way to tell rake to skip all the files in the SCCS

Hi all, I'm having a really frustrating time with a bunch of BT-101 phones. They've been trouble-free and working very well for the past several months. A couple of days ago, some of the phones (but not all of them, yet) have started acting very strangely. All phones are running firmware 1.0.6.7, and are identically configured (except for the user/authenticate/password things) on both the

Andrew and I thought it might be an interesting experiment to move rsync to using BitKeeper rather than CVS for source code control. For a project with rsync's size and activity CVS is actually fine, but it would be a nice "toe in the water" with BitKeeper to get some practical experience before possibly using it on larger projects. BK is moderately well-proven on open source

On 5/31/2017 12:46 PM, m.roth at 5-cent.us wrote: > Not dealing with "secret", dealing with HIPAA and PII data. And*sigh* > Homeland Security Theater dictates.... We run all used disks through a shredder before surplusing any systems, and we are just a manufacturing company dealing with internal corporate IT stuff. the shredder is a truck from a 'data destruction'

On 31/05/17 21:23, John R Pierce wrote: > On 5/31/2017 12:46 PM, m.roth at 5-cent.us wrote: >> Not dealing with "secret", dealing with HIPAA and PII data. And*sigh* >> Homeland Security Theater dictates.... > > We run all used disks through a shredder before surplusing any systems, > and we are just a manufacturing company dealing with internal corporate > IT

On Thu, 9 Aug 2001, Geoff Shang wrote: > > On Mon, 6 Aug 2001, Jack Moffitt wrote: > > > It works, but hasn't been released. I will be making nightly snapshots > > available of the repositories in the next day or so, and that should > > help get more people testing it. So far it's help up quite well, and > > the tools are _nice_ courtesy of Oddsock and